Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia during pregnancy

References

• Wright TC, Jr, Massat LS, Dunton CJ, Spitzer M, Wilkinson EJ, Solomon D, for the 2006 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology-sponsored Consensus Conference. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;10:340–5.
   Google Scholar
• Economos K, Perz Veridiano N, Delke I, Collado ML, Tancer ML. Abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy: a 17-year experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 915–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yost NP, Santoso JT, McIntire DD, Iliya FA. Postpartum regression rates of antepartum cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II and III lesions. Obstet Gynecol. 1999; 93: 359–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan KJ, Dainty LA, Dolinsky B, Rose GS, Carlson J, McHale M, et al. Prognosis and recurrence risk for patients with cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions diagnosed during pregnancy. Cancer 2004; 102: 228–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robova H, Rob L, Pluta M, Kacirek J, Halaska M, Jr, Strnad P, et al. Squamous intraepithelial lesion-microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix during pregnancy. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2005; 26: 611–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boardman LA, Goldman DL, Cooper AS, Heber WW, Weitzen S. CIN in pregnancy: antepartum and postpartum cytology and histology. J Reprod Med. 2005; 50: 13–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palle C, Bangsbøll S, Andreasson B. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2000; 79: 306–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui G, Kurzel RB, Lampley EC, Kang HS, Blankstein J. Cervical dysplasia in pregnancy: progression versus regression post-partum. Int J Fertil Womens Med. 2001; 46: 278–80
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murta EF, de Souza FH, de Souza MA, Adad SJ. High-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion during pregnancy. Tumori. 2002; 88: 246–50
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vlahos G, Rodolakis A, Diakomanolis E, Stefanidis K, Haidopoulos D, Abela K, et al. Conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN(2–3)) in pregnant women. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2002; 54(2)78–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creasman WT. Cancer and pregnancy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001; 943: 281–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan B, Muderspach LI, Roman LD, Curtin JP, d'Ablaing G III, Morrow CP. Cervical cancer in pregnancy: reporting on planned delay in therapy. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 598–602
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox JT, Schiffman M, Solomon D. ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS) Group. Prospective follow-up suggests similar risk of subsequent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or 3 among women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 or negative colposcopy and directed biopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 1406–12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nobbenhuis MA, Helmerhorst TJ, van den Brule AJ, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, Bezemer PD, et al. Cytological regression and clearance of high-risk human papillomavirus in women with an abnormal cervical smear. Lancet. 2001; 358: 1782–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaPolla JP, O'Neill C, Wetrich D. Colposcopic management of abnormal cervical cytology in pregnancy. J Reprod Med. 1988; 33: 301–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002; 287: 2114–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Hills NK, Powell KJ, Jay N, Hanson EN, et al. Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet. 2004; 364: 1678–83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright TC, Jr, Cox JT, Massad LS, Carlson J, Twiggs LB, Wilkinson EJ. 2001consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003; 189: 295–304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoler MH, Schiffman M. Interobserver reproducibility of cervical cytologic and histologic interpretations: realistic estimates from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. JAMA. 2001; 285: 1500–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Östor AG. Natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a critical review. Int J Gynaecol Pathol. 1993; 12: 186–92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T. Natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999; 91: 252–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 1986; 67: 665–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair HB, Luthra R, Kirma N, Liu YG, Flowers L, Evans D, et al. Induction of aromatase expression in cervical carcinomas: effects of endogenous estrogen on cervical cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Res. 2005; 65: 11164–73
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvenne P, Herman L, Kholod N, Caberg JH, Herfs M, Boniver J, et al. Role of hormone cofactors in the human papillomavirus-induced carcinogenesis of the uterine cervix. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2007; 264: 1–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar