References
- Heikkinen H, Tekay A, Volpi E, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Transvaginal salpingosonography for the assessment of tubal patency in infertile women: methodological and clinical experiences. Fertil Steril. 1995; 64: 293–8
- Spalding H, Martikainen H, Tekay A, Jouppila P. A randomized study comparing air to echovist as a contrast medium in the assessment of tubal patency in infertile women using transvaginal salpingosonography. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 2461–4
- Hamilton JA, Larson AJ, Lower AM, Hasnain S, Grudzinskas JG. Routine use of saline hysterosonography in 500 consecutive, unselected, infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13: 2463–73
- Tarik A, Fehmi C. Complications of gynaecological laparoscopy––a retrospective analysis of 3572 cases from a single institute. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2004; 24: 813–6
- Casa A, Sesti F, Marziali M, Piccione E. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy vs. conventional laparoscopy for evaluating unexplained primary infertility in women. J Reprod Med. 2002; 47: 617–20
- Watrelot A, Nisolle M, Chelli H, Hocke C, Rongieres C, Racinet C, et al. Is laparoscopy still the gold standard in infertility assessment? A comparison of fertiloscopy versus laparoscopy in infertility. Results of an international multicentre prospective trial: the ‘FLY’ (fertiloscopy-LaparoscopY) study. Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 834–9
- 7. Gordts S, Brosens I, Gordts S, Puttemans P, Campo R. Progress in transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2004; 31: 631–9
- Shibahara H, Shimada K, Kikuchi K, Hirano Y, Suzuki T, Takamizawa S, et al. Major complications and outcome of diagnostic and operative transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007; 33: 705–9
- Watrelot A, Dreyfus JM, Andine JP. Evaluation of the performance of fertiloscopy in 160 consecutive infertile patients with no obvious pathology. Hum Reprod. 1999; 14: 707–11
- Tekay A, Spalding H, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Agreement between two successive transvaginal salpingosonography assessments of tubal patency. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997; 76: 572–5
- Hamilton J, Latarche E, Gillott C, Lower A, Grudzinskas JG. Intrauterine insemination results are not affected if hysterosalpingo contrast sonography is used as the sole test of tubal patency. Fertil Steril. 2003; 80: 165–71
- Ahinko-Hakamaa K, Huhtala H, Tinkanen H. The validity of air and saline hysterosalpingo-contrast sonography in tubal patency investigation before insemination treatment. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 132: 83–7
- Holz K, Becker R, Schurmann R. Ultrasound in the investigation of tubal patency. A meta-analysis of three comparative studies of echovist-200 including 1007 women. Zentralbl Gynakol. 1997; 119: 366–73
- Spalding H, Tekay A, Martikainen H, Jouppila P. Assessment of tubal patency with transvaginal salpingosonography after treatment for tubal pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 1997; 12: 306–9
- Nirmal D, Griffiths AN, Jose G, Evans J. Warming echovist contrast medium for hysterocontrastsonography and the effect on the incidence of pelvic pain. A randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21: 1052–4
- Sobek A., Jr, Hammadeh M, Vodicka J, Sobek A. Ultrasonographically guided transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 1077–80
- Jonsdottir K, Lundorff P. Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy: a new diagnostic tool in infertility investigation. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002; 81: 882–5