Clinical performance of DIAGNOdent in the detection of secondary carious lesions

References

• Fontana M, Gonzalez-Cabezas C. Secondary caries and restoration replacement: an unresolved problem. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2000; 21: 15–26
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Özer L, Thylstrup A. What is known about caries in relation to restorations as a reason for replacement? A review. Adv Dent Res 1995; 9: 394–402
   Google Scholar
• Kelsey WP, France SJ, Blankenau RJ, Cavel WT, Barkmeier WW. Caries as a cause of restoration replacement: clinical survey. Quintessence Int 1981; 12: 971–4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mjör IA. The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restoration in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 1997; 55: 58–68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Fédération Dentaire Internationale (Special Commission on Oral and Dental Statistics). General principles concerning the international standardization of dental caries statistics. Int Dent J 1962; 12: 65
   Google Scholar
• Grieve AR. Production of secondary caries-like lesion in vitro. Caries Res 1978; 12: 35–42
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EAM, Toffenetti F, Mjör IA. Secondary caries. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 127–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EAM. Caries status of tooth coloured restorations with marginal stain. Br Dent J 1991; 171: 241–3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kidd EAM, Joyston-Bechal S, Beighton D. Marginal ditching and staining as a predictor of secondary caries around amalgam restorations: a clinical and microbiological study. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1206–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espelid I, Tveit AB. Diagnosis of secondary caries and crevices adjacent to amalgam. Int Dent J 1991; 41: 359–64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tveit AB, Espelid I. Class II amalgams: interobserver variations in replacement decisions and diagnosis of caries and crevices. Int Dent J 1992; 42: 12–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hibst R, Gall R. Development of a diode laser-based fluorescence caries detector. Caries Res 1998; 32: 294
   Google Scholar
• Hibst R, Paulus R, Lussi A. Detection of occlusal caries by laser fluorescence: a basic and clinical investigation. Med Laser Appl 2001; 16: 205–13
   Google Scholar
• Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E. Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 1999; 33: 261–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussi A, Megert B, Longbottom C, Reich E, Francescut P. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 14–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussi A, Francescut P. Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 2003; 37: 2–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X-Q, Welander U, Angmar-Månsson B. Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and Radiographic examination: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res 2000; 34: 151–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi X-Q, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Månsson B. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 2001; 35: 21–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shi X-Q, Tranaeus S, Angmar-Månsson B. Validation of DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth-surface caries: an in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2001; 59: 74–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attrill DC, Ashley PF. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 2001; 190: 440–3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamzahim M, Shi X-Q, Angmar-Månsson B. Occlusal caries detection and quantification by DIAGNOdent and Electronic Caries Monitor: in vitro comparison. Acta Odontol Scand 2002; 60: 360–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamzahim M, Shi X-Q, Angmar-Månsson B. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 2004; 62: 61–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boston DW. Initial in vitro evaluation of DIAGNOdent for detecting secondary carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 109–16
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reich E, Marrawi FAL, Pitts N, Lussi A. Clinical validation of a laser caries diagnosis system. Caries Res 1998; 32: 297–8
   Google Scholar
• Rudolphy MP, Gorter Y, van Loveren C, van Amerongen JP. Validity of radiographs for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with class II amalgam restorations in vitro. Caries Res 1997; 31: 24–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rudolphy MP, van Amerongen JP, Penning C, ten Cate JM. Validity of bite-wings for diagnosis of secondary caries in teeth with occlusal amalgam restorations in vitro. Caries Res 1993; 27: 312–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar