An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions

References

• Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, et al. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 215–35
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift E J, Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann H O. Bonding to enamel and dentin. A brief history and state of the art. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 95–110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lopes G C, Baratieri L N, Andrada M AC, Vieira L CC. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002; 33: 213–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pashley D H, Carvalho R M. Dentin permeability and dentin adhesion. J Dent 1997; 25: 355–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, Gladys S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690–702
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijken J WV. Clinical evaluation of three adhesive systems in class V non-carious lesions. Dent Mater 2000; 16: 285–291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swift E J, Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann H O, Wilder A D, Jr, Bayne S C, May K N, Jr, et al. Eighteen-month clinical evaluation of a filled and unfilled dentin adhesive. J Dent 2001; 29: 1–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tyas M J, Burrow M F. Three-year clinical evaluation of One-Step in non-carious cervical lesions. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 309–11
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Türkün S. Clinical evaluation of a self-etching and a one-bottle adhesive system at two years. J Dent 2003; 31: 527–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Spencer P. Hybridization efficiency of the adhesive/dentin interface with wet bonding. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 141–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Sano H, Endo K, Oguchi H. In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1385–91
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 136–40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho R M, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley D H, Prati C, Tay F R. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 1035–42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brackett W W, Covey D A, St Germain H A, Jr. One-year clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive in Class V resin composites cured by two methods. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 218–22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burrow M F, Tyas M J. Clinical evaluation of an ‘all-in-one’ bonding system to non-carious cervical lesions—results at one year. Aust Dent J 2003; 48: 180–2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken J WV. Durability of three simplified adhesive systems in Class V non-carious cervical dentin lesions. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 27–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duke E S, Lindemuth J. Variability of clinical dentin substrates. Am J Dent 1991; 4: 241–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Loguercio A D, Reis A, Barbosa A N, Roulet J F. Five-year double-blind randomized clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer and a polyacid-modified resin in noncarious cervical lesions. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 323–32
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barnes D M, Blank L W, Gingell J C, Gilner P P. A clinical evaluation of a resin-modified glass ionomer restorative material. J Am Dent Assoc 1995; 126: 1245–53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Dental Association—Council on Scientific Affairs American Dental Association Program Guidelines: products for dentin and enamel adhesive materials, June, Available at www.ada.org
   Google Scholar
• Alhadainy H A, Abdalla A I. 2-year clinical evaluation of dentin bonding systems. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 77–9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken J WV. Multi-step versus simplified enamel-dentin bonding systems. Réalités Cliniques 1999; 10: 199–222
   Google Scholar
• Friedl K H, Hiller K A, Jung H, Schlittenbauer T, Lichtblau J, Schmalz G. Clinical evaluation of composite restorations using different adhesive systems. J Dent Res, 80 Spec Iss Abstract #535. Available at www.dentalresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• Wilder A D, Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann H O. Six-month clinical study of an all-in-one dentin adhesive. J Dent Res, 80 Spec Iss Abstract #234. Available at www.dentalresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• Pashley E L, Agee K A, Pashley D H, Tay F R. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent 2002; 30: 83–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frankenberger R, Perdigão J, Rosa B T, Lopes M. “No-bottle” vs “multi-bottle” dentin adhesives: a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 373–80
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyasaki M, Iwasaki K, Onose H. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 88–94
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rueggeberg F A, Margeson D H. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King N M, Tay F R, Pashley D H, Hashimoto M, Ito S, Brackett W W, et al. Conversion of one-step to two-step self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent, In press
   Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Geraldelli S. Bonding characteristics of self-etching adhesives to intact versus prepared enamel. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003; 15: 32–41
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kanemura N, Sano H, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength to and SEM evaluation of ground and intact enamel surfaces. J Dent 1999; 27: 523–30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vich A, Davidson C L. Effect of two etching times on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 66–70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdigão J, Lopes L, Lambrecths P, Leitão J, Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G. Effects of self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 1997; 10: 141–6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Dijken J WV. 3-year clinical evaluation of a compomer, a resin-modified glass ionômero and a resin composite in Class III cavities. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 195–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoue S, Vargas M A, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G, et al. Microtensile bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to enamel. Am J Dent 2003; 16: 329–34
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armstrong S R, Vargas M A, Fang Q, Laffoon J E. Microtensile bond strength of a total-etch 3-step, total-etch 2-step, self-etch 2-step, and a self-etch 1-step dentin bonding system through 15-month water storage. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 47–56
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenshima S, Reis A, Uceda-Gomez N, Tancredo L LF, Rodrigues Filho L E, Nogueira F N, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etch adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent, In press
   Google Scholar
• Munoz C, Dunn J, Fundingsland J, Richter R. Three-year clinical performance of Prompt L-Pop. J Dent Res, 82 Spec Iss A. Abstract #541. Available at www.dentalresearch.org
   Google Scholar
• Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002; 15: 305–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miguez P A, Castro P S, Nunes M F, Walter R, Pereira P N. Effect of acid-etching on the enamel bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 107–12
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, DeMunck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater, In press
   Google Scholar
• Tay F R, Pashley D H. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. Part I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17: 296–308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar