2,064
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Article

Augmented reality in dentistry: a current perspective

, &
Pages 497-503 | Received 12 Nov 2017, Accepted 09 Feb 2018, Published online: 21 Feb 2018

References

  • Tang JB, Amadio PC, Boyer MI, et al. Current practice of primary flexor tendon repair: a global view. Hand Clin. 2013;29:179–189.
  • Hugues O, Fuchs P, Nannipieri O. New augmented reality taxonomy: technologies and features of augmented environment. Berlin: Springer; 2011.
  • Carmigniani J, Furht B. Augmented reality: an overview. In: Furht B, editor. Handbook of augmented reality. New York (NY): Springer New York; 2011. p. 3–46.
  • Vaughan-Nichols SJ. Augmented reality: no longer a novelty? Computer. 2009;42:19–22.
  • Feiner SK. Augmented reality: a new way of seeing. Sci Am. 2002;286:48–55.
  • McCloy R, Stone R. Science, medicine, and the future. Virtual reality in surgery. BMJ. 2001;323:912–915.
  • Ryan ML. Immersion vs. Interactivity: virtual reality and literary theory. Baltimore (MD): Project MUSE; 1999.
  • Albuha Al-Mussawi RM, Farid F. Computer-based technologies in dentistry: types and applications. J Dent (Tehran). 2016;13:215–222.
  • Riva G, Mantovani F, Gaggioli A. Presence and rehabilitation: toward second-generation virtual reality applications in neuropsychology. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004;1:9.
  • Zinser MJ, Mischkowski RA, Dreiseidler T, et al. Computer-assisted orthognathic surgery: waferless maxillary positioning, versatility, and accuracy of an image-guided visualisation display. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;51:827–833.
  • Zhou F, Duh HBL, Billinghurst M. Trends in augmented reality tracking, interaction and display: a review of ten years of ISMAR. Proceedings of the 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. Washington (DC): IEEE Computer Society; 2008. p. 193–202.
  • Azuma R, Baillot Y, Behringer R, et al. Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE Comput Grap Appl. 2001;21:34–47.
  • Meola A, Cutolo F, Carbone M, et al. Augmented reality in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Rev. 2016;40:537–548.
  • Reidsma D, Katayose H, Nijholt A. Advances in computer entertainment. Proceedings of the10th International Conference, ACE 2013 Bekel, 2013 Nov 12–15; The Netherlands. Berlin: Springer; 2013.
  • Chicchi Giglioli IA, Pallavicini F, Pedroli E, et al. Augmented reality: a brand new challenge for the assessment and treatment of psychological disorders. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:862942.
  • Berryman DR. Augmented reality: a review. Med Ref Serv Q. 2012;31:212–218.
  • Alberti O, Dorward NL, Kitchen ND, et al. Neuronavigation-impact on operating time. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1997;68:44–48.
  • Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technique assessment and considerations. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:1769–1774.
  • Cabrilo I, Bijlenga P, Schaller K. Augmented reality in the surgery of cerebral aneurysms: a technical report. Neurosurgery. 2014;10(2):252–260.
  • Cabrilo I, Sarrafzadeh A, Bijlenga P, et al. Augmented reality-assisted skull base surgery. Neurochirurgie. 2014;60:304–306.
  • Cabrilo I, Schaller K, Bijlenga P. Augmented reality-assisted bypass surgery: embracing minimal invasiveness. World Neurosurg. 2015;83:596–602.
  • Deng W, Li F, Wang M, et al. Easy-to-use augmented reality neuronavigation using a wireless tablet PC. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2014;92:17–24.
  • Abdul-Muhsin HM, Humphreys MR. Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques. F1000Res. 2016;5:716.
  • Bastien S, Peuchot B, Tanguy A. Augmented reality in spine surgery: critical appraisal and status of development. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;88:153–156.
  • Botden SM, Jakimowicz JJ. What is going on in augmented reality simulation in laparoscopic surgery? Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1693–1700.
  • Mahmud N, Cohen J, Tsourides K, et al. Computer vision and augmented reality in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastroenterol Rep. 2015;3:179–184.
  • Nakamoto M, Ukimura O, Faber K, et al. Current progress on augmented reality visualization in endoscopic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2012;22:121–126.
  • Okamoto T, Onda S, Yanaga K, et al. Clinical application of navigation surgery using augmented reality in the abdominal field. Surg Today. 2015;45:397–406.
  • Tagaya N, Yamazaki R, Nakagawa A, et al. Intraoperative identification of sentinel lymph nodes by near-infrared fluorescence imaging in patients with breast cancer. Am J Surg. 2008;195:850–853.
  • Assis GA, Correa AG, Martins MB, et al. An augmented reality system for upper-limb post-stroke motor rehabilitation: a feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016;11:521–528.
  • Chang YJ, Kang YS, Huang PC. An augmented reality (AR)-based vocational task prompting system for people with cognitive impairments. Res Dev Disabil. 2013;34:3049–3056.
  • Hervas R, Bravo J, Fontecha J. An assistive navigation system based on augmented reality and context awareness for people with mild cognitive impairments. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2014;18:368–374.
  • Austin AA, Druschel CM, Tyler MC, et al. Interdisciplinary craniofacial teams compared with individual providers: is orofacial cleft care more comprehensive and do parents perceive better outcomes? Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010;47:1–8.
  • Lovo EE, Quintana JC, Puebla MC, et al. A novel, inexpensive method of image coregistration for applications in image-guided surgery using augmented reality. Neurosurgery. 2007;60:366–371.
  • Gardiner S, Hartzell TL. Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a review of its applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:e47–e53.
  • Hoppe H, Salb T, Raczkowsky J, et al. [Expanded reality in head surgery]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 2002;47(1 Pt 2):946–949.
  • Wagner A, Kremser J, Watzinger F, et al. [Telenavigation and expert consultation using a stereotaxic surgical videoserver]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2000;4(l 1):S369–S374.
  • Wang J, Suenaga H, Yang L, et al. Video see-through augmented reality for oral and maxillofacial surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2017;13:e1754.
  • Nijmeh AD, Goodger NM, Hawkes D, et al. Image-guided navigation in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;43:294–302.
  • Tran HH, Suenaga H, Kuwana K, et al. Augmented reality system for oral surgery using 3D auto stereoscopic visualization. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2011;14:81–88.
  • Yu J, Ferniany W, Guthrie B, et al. Lessons learned from google glass: telemedical spark or unfulfilled promise? Surg Innov. 2016;23:156–165.
  • Ploder O, Wagner A, Enislidis G, et al. [Computer-assisted intraoperative visualization of dental implants. Augmented reality in medicine]. Radiologe. 1995;35:569–572.
  • Ewers R, Schicho K. Augmented reality telenavigation in cranio maxillofacial oral surgery. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2009;150:24–25.
  • Kato H, Billinghurst M. Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based augmented reality conferencing system. IWAR ‘99 Proceedings of 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality’; Washington (DC): IEEE Computer Society; 1999. p. 85–94.
  • Yamaguchi S, Ohtani T, Ono S, et al. Intuitive surgical navigation system for dental implantology by using retinal imaging display. In: Turkyilmaz I, editor. Implant dentistry – a rapidly evolving practice. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2011.
  • Yamaguchi S, Ohtani T, Yatani H, et al. Augmented reality system for dental implant surgery. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2009. p. 633–638.
  • Katic D, Spengler P, Bodenstedt S, et al. A system for context-aware intraoperative augmented reality in dental implant surgery. Int J Cars. 2015;10:101–108.
  • Lin YK, Yau HT, Wang IC, et al. A novel dental implant guided surgery based on integration of surgical template and augmented reality. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17:543–553.
  • Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer-assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;34:1–8.
  • Wagner A, Rasse M, Millesi W, et al. Virtual reality for orthognathic surgery: the augmented reality environment concept. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:456–462.
  • Mischkowski RA, Zinser MJ, Kubler AC, et al. Application of an augmented reality tool for maxillary positioning in orthognathic surgery - a feasibility study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34:478–483.
  • Zhu M, Chai G, Zhang Y, et al. Registration strategy using occlusal splint based on augmented reality for mandibular angle oblique split osteotomy. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:1806–1809.
  • Fushima K, Kobayashi M. Mixed-reality simulation for orthognathic surgery. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;38:13.
  • Suenaga H, Tran HH, Liao H, et al. Vision-based markerless registration using stereo vision and an augmented reality surgical navigation system: a pilot study. BMC Med Imaging. 2015;15:51.
  • Suenaga H, Hoang Tran H, Liao H, et al. Real-time in situ three-dimensional integral videography and surgical navigation using augmented reality: a pilot study. Int J Oral Sci. 2013;5:98–102.
  • Wang J, Suenaga H, Hoshi K, et al. Augmented reality navigation with automatic marker-free image registration using 3-D image overlay for dental surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014;61:1295–1304.
  • Badiali G, Ferrari V, Cutolo F, et al. Augmented reality as an aid in maxillofacial surgery: validation of a wearable system allowing maxillary repositioning. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:1970–1976.
  • Wang J, Suenaga H, Liao H, et al. Real-time computer-generated integral imaging and 3D image calibration for augmented reality surgical navigation. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2015;40:147–159.
  • Olsson P, Nysjo F, Hirsch JM, et al. A haptics-assisted cranio-maxillofacial surgery planning system for restoring skeletal anatomy in complex trauma cases. Int J Cars. 2013;8:887–894.
  • Woo T, Kraeima J, Kim YO, et al. Mandible reconstruction with 3D virtual planning. J Int Soc Simul Surg. 2015;2:90–93.
  • Schendel S, Montgomery K, Sorokin A, et al. A surgical simulator for planning and performing repair of cleft lips. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2005;33:223–228.
  • Zhang J, Li D, Liu Q, et al. Virtual surgical system in reduction of maxillary fracture. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Digital Signal Processing (DSP); 2015. p. 1102–1105.
  • Qu M, Hou Y, Xu Y, et al. Precise positioning of an intraoral distractor using augmented reality in patients with hemifacial microsomia. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:106–112.
  • Wu F, Chen X, Lin Y, et al. A virtual training system for maxillofacial surgery using advanced haptic feedback and immersive workbench. Int J Med Robot. 2014;10:78–87.
  • Lin Y, Wang X, Wu F, et al. Development and validation of a surgical training simulator with haptic feedback for learning bone-sawing skill. J Biomed Inform. 2014;48:122–129.
  • Ewers R, Schicho K, Wagner A, et al. Seven years of clinical experience with teleconsultation in craniomaxillofacial surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;63:1447–1454.
  • Aichert A, Wein W, Ladikos A, et al. Image-based tracking of the teeth for orthodontic augmented reality. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2012;15:601–608.
  • Bruellmann DD, Tjaden H, Schwanecke U, et al. An optimized video system for augmented reality in endodontics: a feasibility study. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17:441–448.
  • Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4174–4183.
  • Estai M, Bunt S. Best teaching practices in anatomy education: a critical review. Ann Anat. 2016;208:151–157.
  • McLachlan JC, Patten D. Anatomy teaching: ghosts of the past, present and future. Med Educ. 2006;40:243–253.
  • Aziz MA, McKenzie JC, Wilson JS, et al. The human cadaver in the age of biomedical informatics. Anat Rec. 2002;269:20–32.
  • Ma M, Fallavollita P, Seelbach I, et al. Personalized augmented reality for anatomy education. Clin Anat. 2016;29:446–453.
  • Yoshida Y, Yamaguchi S, Kawamoto Y, et al. Development of a multi-layered virtual tooth model for the haptic dental training system. Dent Mater J. 2011;30:1–6.
  • Bogdan CM, Popovici DM. Information system analysis of an e-learning system used for dental restorations simulation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2012;107:357–366.
  • Espejo-Trung LC, Elian SN, Luz MA. Development and application of a new learning object for teaching operative dentistry using augmented reality. J Dent Educ. 2015;79:1356–1362.
  • Llena C, Folguera S, Forner L, et al. Implementation of augmented reality in operative dentistry learning. Eur J Dent Educ. 2018;22:e122–e130.
  • Mitrasinovic S, Camacho E, Trivedi N, et al. Clinical and surgical applications of smart glasses. Technol Health Care. 2015;23:381–401.
  • Burdea GC, Coiffet P. Virtual reality technology. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2003.
  • Khor WS, Baker B, Amin K, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in surgery-the digital surgical environment: applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4:454.
  • Kersten-Oertel M, Chen SJ, Collins DL. An evaluation of depth enhancing perceptual cues for vascular volume visualization in neurosurgery. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2014;20:391–403.
  • Kersten-Oertel M, Jannin P, Collins DL. DVV: a taxonomy for mixed reality visualization in image guided surgery. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graphics. 2012;18:332–352.
  • Heuveling DA, Karagozoglu KH, van Schie A, et al. Sentinel node biopsy using 3D lymphatic mapping by freehand SPECT in early stage oral cancer: a new technique. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012;37:89–90.
  • Schnelzer A, Ehlerding A, Blumel C, et al. Showcase of intraoperative 3D imaging of the sentinel lymph node in a breast cancer patient using the new freehand SPECT technology. Breast Care (Basel). 2012;7:484–486.
  • Diana M, Dallemagne B, Chung H, et al. Probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and fluorescence-based enhanced reality for real-time assessment of intestinal microcirculation in a porcine model of sigmoid ischemia. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:3224–3233.
  • Gandaglia G, Schatteman P, De Naeyer G, et al. Novel technologies in urologic surgery: a rapidly changing scenario. Curr Urol Rep. 2016;17:19.
  • Gettman M, Rivera M. Innovations in robotic surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2016;26:271–276.
  • Hughes-Hallett A, Mayer EK, Marcus HJ, et al. Augmented reality partial nephrectomy: examining the current status and future perspectives. Urology. 2014;83:266–273.
  • Kim Y, Kim H, Kim YO. Virtual reality and augmented reality in plastic surgery: a review. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44:179–187.
  • Moglia A, Ferrari V, Morelli L, et al. A systematic review of virtual reality simulators for robot-assisted surgery. Eur Urol. 2016;69:1065–1080.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.