Howse II cemented titanium metal-backed acetabular cups
Poor 10-year results in 107 hips

References

• Bartel D L, Wright T M, Edwards D. The effect of metal backing on stresses in polyethylene acetabular compo-nents. In : The hip (ed. Hungerford DS). Proceedings of the 11th open meeting of the Hip Society, Mosby, CV., St. Louis 1983: 220.
   Google Scholar
• Bartel D L, Bicknell V L, Wright T M. The effect of con-formity, thickness and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1986; 68: 1041–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry D J, Barnes C L, Scott R D, Cabanela M E, Poss R. Catastrophic failure of the polyethylene liner of unce-mented acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 575–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bono J V, Sansford L, Toussaint J T. Severe polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1994; 9 (2): 119–25.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carter D R, Vasu R, Harris W H. Stress distributions in the acetabular region. Part II. Effects of cement thickness and metal backing of the total hip acetabular component. J Biomech 1982; 15: 165–70.
   Google Scholar
• Cates H E, Faris P M, Keating E M, Ritter M A. Polyeth-ylene wear in cemented metal-backed acetabular cups. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 249–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen F S, Di Cesare PE, Kale AA, et al. Results of cemented metal-backed acetabular components. A 10-year average follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (8): 867–73.
   Google Scholar
• Crowenshield R D, Brand R A, Pedersen D R. A stress anal-ysis of acetabular reconstruction in protrusio acetabuli. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1983; 65: 495–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dalstra M, Huiskes R. The influence of metal backing in cemented cups. Orthop Trans 1991; 15: 459.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson J A. Characteristics of metal and ceramic total bearing surfaces and their effect on long-term ultra high molecular weight polyethylene wear. Clin Orthop 1993; 294: 361–78.
   Google Scholar
• Garrelick G, Malchau H, Regner H, Herberts P. The Charm-ley versus the Spectron Hip prosthesis. Radiographic evaluation of a randomised, prospective study of two dif-ferent hip implants. J Arthroplasty 1999; 14 (4): 414–25.
   Google Scholar
• Harris W H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mould arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evalua-tion. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969; 51: 737–55.
   Google Scholar
• Harris W H. Anew total hip implant. Clin Orthop 1971; 81: 105–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris W H. Advances in total hip arthroplasty. The metal-backed acetabular component. Clin Orthop 1984; 183: 4–11.
   Google Scholar
• Harris W H, White R E. Socket-fixation using a metal-backed acetabular component for total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1982; 64: 745–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris W H, Penenberg B L. Further follow-up on socket fixation using a metal-backed acetabular component for total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1987; 69: 1140–3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kabo J M, Gebhard J S, Loren G, Amstutz H C. In vivo wear of polyethylene acetabular components. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1993; 75: 254–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livermore J, Ilstrup D, Money B. Effect of femoral head size on wear of the polyethylene acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 518–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markel D C, Huo M H, Katkin P, Salvati E A. Use of cemented all-polyethylene and metal-backed acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10: 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Massin P, Schmidt L, Engh C A. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration. J. Arthroplasty 1989; 4: 245–51.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly D A, Hopson C N, Kahn A, Giannestras N J. Aseptic loosening in metal-backed acetabular compo-nents for total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985; 67: 387–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McKellop H A, Campbell P, Park SH, Schmalzried T P, Grigoris P, Amstutz H C. Sarmiento A. The origin of sub-micron polyethylene wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1995; 311: 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mulliken B D, Nayak N, Bourne R B, Rorabeck C H, Bullas R. Early radiographic results comparing cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(1): 24–33.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perez R E, Rodriguez J A, Deshmukh R G, Ranawat C S. Polyethylene wear and periprosthetic osteolysis in metal-backed acetabular components with cylindrical liners. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13 (1): 1–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritter M A. The cemented acetabular component of a total hip replacement. All polyethylene versus metal backing. Chin Orthop 1995; 311: 69–75.
   Google Scholar
• Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Brugo G. Metal-backed acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1990; 72: 672–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sochart D H, Hardinge K. Comparison of the Wrightington FC hip with the Charnley low friction arthroplasty. 10- to 15-year results and survival analysis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1998; 80: 577–84.
   Google Scholar
• Sutula L C, Collier J P, Saum K A, et al. The Otto Aufranc Award: impact of gamma sterilisation on the clinical per-formance of polyethylene in the hip. Clin Orthop 1995; 319: 28–40.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D E Titanium: epitome of biocompatibility or cause for concern. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1994; 76: 348–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ziegler B S, Lachiewicz P E Survivorship analysis of cemented total hip arthroplasty acetabular compo-nents implanted with second generation techniques. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(6): 750–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar