Advanced search
Publication Cover
Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica Volume 74, 2003 - Issue 4
Journal homepage
567
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Open versus arthroscopic subacromial decompression
A prospective, randomized study of 34 patients followed for 8 years

Torstein Husby Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway Correspondence: [email protected]
,
Jan-Ragnar Haugstvedt Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway Correspondence: [email protected]
,
Merete Brandt Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway Correspondence: [email protected]
,
Inger Holm Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway Correspondence: [email protected]
&
Harald Steen Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, NO-0027 Oslo, Norway Correspondence: [email protected]
Pages 408-414 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Brox J I, Holm I, Ludvigsen P, Steen H. Pain influence on isokinetic shoulder muscle strength in patients with rota-tor tendinosis (impingement syndrome stage II). Eur J Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 5 (6): 196–9.
  • Caspari R B, Thal R. A technique for arthroscopic subacro-mial decompression. Arthroscopy 1992; 8 (1): 23–30.
  • Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analy-sis of one- to three-year results. Arthroscopy 1987; 3 (3): 173–81.
  • Ellman H. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression. In: Parisien JS, ed. Arthroscopic surgery. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988: 243–8.
  • Ellman H. Arthroscopic treatment of impingement of the shoulder. In: AAOS Instructional Course Lectures, 1989; 38: 177–85.
  • Ellman H, Kay S P. Arthroscopic subacromial decompres-sion for chronic impingement. Two- to five-year results. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1991; 73 (3): 395–8.
  • Esch J C, Ozerkis L R, Helgager J, Kane N, Lilliott R N. Shoulder arthroscopy: basics. In proceedings: Exhibit on shoulder arthroscopy for the 1987 AAOS Meeting.
  • Esch J C, Ozerkis L R, Helgager J A, Kane N, Lilliott R N. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: results accord-ing to the degree of rotator cuff tear. Arthroscopy 1988; 4 (4): 241–9.
  • Harms-Ringdahl K, Carlsson A, Ekholm J, Raustorp A, Svensson T, Toresson H. Pain assessment with different intensity scales in response to loading of joint structures. Pain 1986; 27: 401–11.
  • Hawkins R J, Kennedy J C. Impingement syndrome in ath-letes. Am J Sports Med 1980; 8: 151–8.
  • Holm I, Brox J I, Ludvigsen P, Steen H. External rotation - best isokinetic movement pattern for evaluation of muscle function in rotator tendinosis. A prospective study with a 2-year follow-up. Isokinetics and Exercise Science 1996; 5: 121–5.
  • Johannsen H V, Andersen N H, Sojbjerg J 0, Sneppen 0. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression. Ugeskr Laeger 1997; 159 (2): 166–70.
  • Kim S J, Lee J W, Kim B S. Arthroscopic decompression for subacromial impingement syndrome. J Korean Med Sci 1997; 12(2): 123–7.
  • Kleinbaum D G, Kupper L L, Muller K E. Applied Regres-sion Analysis and other Multivariate Methods 2nd ed. PSW-Kent Publishing Boston 1987.
  • Lindh M, Norlin R. Arthroscopic subacromial decompres-sion versus open acromioplasty. A two-year follow-up study. Clin Ortop 1993; 290: 174–6.
  • Martha K V, Kent J T, Bibby J M. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, London. 3rd printing 1983.
  • Neer C S. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impinge-ment syndrome in the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1972; 54: 41–50.
  • Neer C S. Impingement lesions. Clin Orthop 1983; 173: 70–7.
  • Norlin R. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression versus open acromioplasty. Arthroscopy 1989; 5 (4): 321–3.
  • Post M, Cohen J. Impingement syndrome: A review of late stage II and early stage III lesions. Clin Orthop 1986; 207: 126–32.
  • Raggio C L, Warren R F, Sculco T. Surgical treatment of impingement syndrome: 4-year follow-up. Orthop Trans 1985; 9: 48–9.
  • Roye R P, Grana WA, Yates C K. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: two- to seven-year follow-up. Arthros-copy 1995; 11(3): 301–6.
  • Sachs R, Stone M L, Devine S. Open vs. arthroscopic acromioplasty: A prospective randomized study. Arthros-copy 1994; 10: 248–54.
  • Stephens S R, Warren R F, Payne L Z, Wickiewicz T L, Altchek D W. Arthroscopic acromioplasty: a 6-to 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 1998; 14 (4): 382–8.
  • T'Jonck L, Lysens R, De-Smet L, Bellemans J, Stoffelen D, Tirez B, Witvrouw E. Open versus arthroscopic subacro-mial decompression: Analysis of one-year results. Phys Res Int 1997; 2 (2): 46–61.
  • Van Holsbeeck E, DeRycke J, Declercq G, Martens M, Verstreken J, Fabry G. Subacromial impingement: open versus arthroscopic decompression. Arthroscopy 1992; 8 (2): 173–8.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.