Phase III results with a totally implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: Speech audiometry, spatial hearing and psychosocial adjustment

References

• Lehner R, Maassen MM, Plester D, Zenner HP. Ossicular chain coupling of an implantable hearing aid transducer using an ER:YAG laser. HNO 1997; 45: 867–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leysieffer H, Baumann JW, Mailer G, Zenner HP. An implantable piezoelectric hearing aid transducer for sensorineural hearing loss. Part II: clinical implant. HNO 1997; 45: 801–15.
   Google Scholar
• Leysieffer H, Muller G, Zenner HP. An implantable microphone for electronic hearing implants. HNO 1997; 45: 816–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tjellstrom A, Luetje CM, Hough JVD, et al. Acute human trial of the floating mass transducer. Proc. 2nd Int. Symp. Electrical Implants, Goteborg, Sweden, 1996: 29 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Zenner HP, Leysieffer H. Totally implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss. Lancet 1998; 352: 1751–2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zenner HP, Massen MM, Plinkert P, et al. First implantations of a totally implantable electronic hearing system for sensorineural hearing loss. HNO 1998; 46: 844–52.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zenner HP, Leysieffer H. Total implantation of the Implex TICA hearing amplifier implant for high fre-quency sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001; 34: 417–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiessling J. Scaling methods for the selection, fitting and evaluation of hearing aids. In: Kollmeier B, editor. Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Limberger A, Sesterhenn G, Boppert R, Arold R. Subjective fitting of hearing aids. Audiol Akustik 1997; 3: 130–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kollmeier B, Wesselkamp M. Development and evalua-tion of a German sentence test for objective and subjective speech intelligibility assessment. J Acoust Soc Am 1997; 102: 2412–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringdahl A, Eriksson-Mangold M, Anderson G. Psy-chometric evaluation of the Gothenburg Profile for measurement of experienced hearing disability and handicap: application with new hearing aid candidates and hearing aid users. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 371–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gatehouse S. The time course and magnitude of perceptual acclimatization to frequency responses. J Acoust Soc Am 1992; 92: 1256–68.
   Google Scholar
• Peters RW, Moore BCJ, Baer J. Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spatial and temporal chips for hearing impaired and normal hearing people. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 103: 577–87.
   Google Scholar
• Blauert J. Spatial hearing: the psychophysics of human sound localization. Cambridge, MA: MIT; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Stock A. Uber das Tragen von Hörhiffen. Audiol Akustik 1995; 3: 105–24.
   Google Scholar
• Caye-Thomasen P, Jensen JH, Bonding P, Tos M. Long-term results and experience with the first-generation semi-implantable electromagnetic hearing aid with ossi-cular replacement device for mixed hearing loss. Otol Neurootol 2002; 23: 904–11.
   Google Scholar
• Frederickson JM, Coticchia JM, Khosla S. Ongoing investigations into an implantable electromagnetic hear-ing aid for moderate severe sensorineural hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1995; 28: 107–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hough JV, Mathews P, Wood MW, Dyer RK Jr. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial. Otol Neurootol 2002; 23: 895–903.
   Google Scholar
• Kodera K, Suzuki JI, Ohno T. Evaluation of the implantable microphone in the cat. Adv Audiol 1988; 4: 117–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lenarz T, Weber BP, Mack KF, Baltmer RD, Gnadeberg D. Vibrant Soundbridge System. Laryngorhinootologie 1998; 77: 247–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniglia AJ. State of the art on the development of the implantable hearing device for partial hearing loss. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1996; 29: 225–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plinkert PK, Baumann JW, Lenarz T, Keiner S, Ley-sieffer H, Zenner HP. Animal experiments with a piezo-electrical implantable hearing aid transducer in the cat. HNO 1997; 45: 828–34.
   Google Scholar
• Weber B. Chronic animal experiments with a piezo-electric transducer and a microphone [Thesis]. Hann-over, Germany: Hannover Medical University; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann J, KieBling J, Schubert M. A concept for the evaluation of hearing aid benefit. In: Kollmeier B, editor. Psychoacoustics, speech and hearing aids. Singa-pore, Singapore: World Scientific; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Dewing W, Hamacher V. Neue Sprachver-ständlichkeitstests in der Klinik. In: Kollmeier B, editor. Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie. Heidelberg, Germany: Median; 1992. p. 137–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kiessling J. Current approaches to hearing aid evalua-tion. J Speech Lang Pathol Audiol Monogr 1993; Suppl. 1: 39–49.
   Google Scholar
• Pastoors AD, Gebhart TM, Kollmeier B, Kiefiling J. Digitales Prototyp-Horgerät im Feldtest. Z Audiol 1998; Suppl I: 103–5.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselkamp W, Kliem K, Kollmeier B. ErsteRung eines optimierten Satztestes in deutscher Sprache. In: Koll-meier B, editor. Moderne Verfahren der Sprachaudio-metrie. Heidelberg, Germany: Median; 1992. p. 330–43.
   Google Scholar
• Moore BCJ. Perceptual consequences of cochlear da-mage. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Plomp R. Auditory handicap of hearing impairment and the limited benefit from hearing aids. J Acoust Soc Am 1998; 63: 533–49.
   Google Scholar
• Maassen MM, Lehner R, Dammann F, Lildtke R, Zenner HP. Value of Schuller conventional roentgen diagnosis and computerized tomography of the temporal bone in preoperative diagnosis of the Tubingen implantable cochlea amplifier. HNO 1998; 46: 220–7.
   Google Scholar