212
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Comparison of electrode position between round window and cochleostomy inserting approaches among young children: a cone-beam computed tomography study

ORCID Icon, , , , , , , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 815-821 | Received 27 Feb 2018, Accepted 14 May 2018, Published online: 23 Jun 2018

References

  • Mcrackan TR, Bauschard M, Hatch JL, et al. Meta‐analysis of quality‐of‐life improvement after cochlear implantation and associations with speech recognition abilities. LARYNGOSCOPE 2018;128:982–990. Apr
  • Jiam NT, Jiradejvong P, Pearl MS, et al. The effect of round window vs cochleostomy surgical approaches on cochlear implant electrode position: a flat-panel computed tomography study. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016; Sep 1142:873–880.
  • Adunka OF, Buchman CA. Scala tympani cochleostomy I: results of a survey. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:2187–2194. Dec
  • Addams-Williams J, Munaweera L, Coleman B, et al. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: in defence of cochleostomy and factors against the round window membrane approach. Cochlear. Implants Int. 2011;12:S36–S39. Aug
  • Pau HW, Just T, Bornitz M, et al. Noise exposure of the inner ear during drilling a cochleostomy for cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:535–540. Mar
  • Roland PS, Wright CG, Isaacson B. Cochlear implant electrode insertion: the round window revisited. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:1397–1402. Aug
  • Cipolla MJ, Iyer P, Dome C, et al. Modification and comparison of minimally invasive cochleostomy techniques: A pilot study. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:1142–1147. May
  • Williamson T, Du X, Bell B, et al. Mechatronic Feasibility of Minimally Invasive, Atraumatic Cochleostomy. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:(1–181624.
  • Zou J, Hannula M, Lehto K, et al. X-ray microtomographic confirmation of the reliability of CBCT in identifying the scalar location of cochlear implant electrode after round window insertion. Hear Res. 2015;326:59–65. Aug
  • De Seta D, Mancini P, Russo FY, et al. 3D curved multiplanar cone beam CT reconstruction for intracochlear position assessment of straight electrodes array. A temporal bone and clinical study. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2016;36:499–505. Dec
  • Würfel W, Lanfermann H, Lenarz T, et al. Cochlear length determination using Cone Beam Computed Tomography in a clinical setting. Hear Res. 2014;316:65–72.
  • Meng J, Li S, Zhang F, et al. Cochlear size and shape variability and implications in cochlear implantation surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2016;37:1307–1313. Oct
  • Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Stidham K, et al. Cochleostomy site: implications for electrode placement and hearing preservation. Acta Otolaryngol. 2005;125:870–876. Aug
  • Gudis DA, Montes M, Bigelow DC, et al. The round window: is it the "cochleostomy" of choice? Experience in 130 consecutive cochlear implants. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33:1497
  • Rowe D, Chambers S, Hampson A, et al. Delayed low frequency hearing loss caused by cochlear implantation interventions via the round window but not cochleostomy. Hear Res. 2016;333:49–57. Mar
  • Sikka K, Kairo A, Singh CA, et al. An evaluation of the surgical trauma to intracochlear structures after insertion of cochlear implant electrode arrays: a comparison by round window and antero-inferior cochleostomy techniques. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017;69:375–379. Sep
  • Briggs RJ, Tykocinski M, Xu J, et al. Comparison of round window and cochleostomy approaches with a prototype hearing preservation electrode. Audiol Neurotol. 2006;11: Suppl 142–48.
  • Buchman CA, Dillon MT, King ER, et al. Influence of cochlear implant insertion depth on performance: a prospective randomized trial. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35:1773–1779. Dec
  • Czerny C, Gstoettner W, Adunka O, et al. Postoperative imaging and evaluation of the electrode position and depth of insertion of multichannel cochlear implants by means of high-resolution computed tomography and conventional X-rays. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2000; Jun 2112:509–511.
  • Colby CC, Todd NW, Harnsberger HR, et al. Standardization of CT depiction of cochlear implant insertion depth. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36:368–371. Feb

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.