274
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Recovery period of sinonasal quality of life and its associated factors after endoscopic endonasal approach for anterior skull base tumors

, , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 461-466 | Received 15 Sep 2018, Accepted 13 Nov 2018, Published online: 26 Feb 2019

References

  • Moussazadeh N, Prabhu V, Bander ED, et al. Endoscopic endonasal versus open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas: a case-matched single-institution analysis. Neurosurgical Focus. 2016;41:E7.
  • Farquhar D, Kim L, Worrall D, et al. Propensity score analysis of endoscopic and open approaches to malignant paranasal and anterior skull base tumor outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2016;126:1724–1729.
  • Graffeo CS, Dietrich AR, Grobelny B, et al. A panoramic view of the skull base: systematic review of open and endoscopic endonasal approaches to four tumors. Pituitary. 2014;17:349–356.
  • Abergel A, Cavel O, Margalit N, et al. Comparison of quality of life after transnasal endoscopic vs open skull base tumor resection. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012;138:142–147.
  • Wu V, Cusimano MD, Lee JM. Extent of surgery in endoscopic transsphenoidal skull base approaches and the effects on sinonasal morbidity. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2018;32:52–56.
  • Chaudhry S, Chaudhry S, Qureshi T, et al. Evolution of sinonasal symptoms and mucosal healing after minimally invasive pituitary surgery. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2017;31:117–121.
  • Glicksman JT, Parasher AK, Brooks SG, et al. Sinonasal quality of life after endoscopic resection of malignant sinonasal and skull base tumors. Laryngoscope. 2018;128:789–793.
  • Piccirillo JF, Merritt MG Jr, Richards ML. Psychometric and clinimetric validity of the 20-Item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-20). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;126:41–47.
  • Chung SB, Nam DH, Park K, et al. Injectable hydroxyapatite cement patch as an on-lay graft for the sellar reconstructions following endoscopic endonasal approach. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154:659–664.
  • Kitano TM. Icing and multilayering technique of injectable hydroxyapatite cement paste for cranial base reconstruction after transsphenoidal surgery: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2007;61: E53–E54.
  • Iaccarino C, Mattogno PP, Zanotti B, et al. Septic complication following porous hydroxyapatite cranioplasty: prosthesis retention management. J Neurosurg Sci. 2016;62:765–772.
  • Wong RK, Gandolfi BM, St-Hilaire H, et al. Complications of hydroxyapatite bone cement in secondary pediatric craniofacial reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22:247–251.
  • Burstein FD, Cohen SR, Hudgins R, et al. The use of hydroxyapatite cement in secondary craniofacial reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:1270–1275.
  • Verret D, Ducic Y, Oxford L, et al. Hydroxyapatite cement in craniofacial reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:897–899.
  • Kirkman MA, Borg A, Al-Mousa A, et al. Quality-of-life after anterior skull base surgery: a systematic review. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2014;75:73–89.
  • Rioja E, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Enriquez K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach for skull base surgery: a prospective study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273:1809–1817.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.