Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Sand Hills Ecoregion of the Southeastern United States

REFERENCES

• Bailey, R. C., R. H. Norris, and T. B. Reynoldson. 2004. Bioassessment of freshwater ecosystems: using the reference condition approach. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder, and J. B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in wadeable streams and rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish, 2nd edition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841-B-99-002, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Bramblett, R. G., and K. D. Fausch. 1991. Variable fish communities and the index of biotic integrity in a western Great Plains river. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 134:624–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, D. M., C. P. Hawkins, M. R. Meador, M. Potapova, and J. Falcone. 2008. Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrate, and diatom assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:16–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casarim, F. M. 2010. Legacy sediments in southeastern United States Coastal Plain streams. Master’s thesis. Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., P. Cohen, S. G. West, and L. S. Aiken. 2002. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Cuffney, T. F., M. D. Bilger, and A. M. Haigler. 2007. Ambiguous taxa: effects on the characterization and interpretation of invertebrate assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26:286–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, K. W., and R. W. Merritt. 1996. Ecology and distribution of aquatic insects. Pages 105–122 in R. W. Merritt and K. W. Cummins, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• DeCarlo, L. T. 1998. Signal detection theory and generalized linear models. Psychological Methods 3:186–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J., J. Stribling, L. Huff, and J. Gilliam. 2012. An approach for determining bioassessment performance and comparability. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 184:2247–2260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, J. M., M. T. Barbour, and J. B. Stribling. 1996. Characterizing and comparing bioassessment methods and their results: a perspective. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15:713–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epler, J. H. 2001. Identification manual for the larval Chironomidae (Diptera) of North and South Carolina. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Quality, Raleigh.
   Google Scholar
• Epler, J. H. 2010. Identification manual for the water beetles of Florida (Coleoptera: Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Elmidae, Gyrinidae, Haliplidae, Hydraenidae, Hydrophilidae, Noteridae, Psephenidae, Ptilodactylidae, Scirtidae). Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Water Facilities. Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Fausch, K. D., J. R. Karr, and P. R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:39–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimpong, E. A., and P. L. Angermeier. 2010. Comparative utility of selected frameworks for regionalizing fish-based bioassessments across the United States. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 139:1872–1895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GDNR (Georgia Department of Natural Resources). 2005. Part III: scoring criteria for the index of biotic integrity and the index of well-being to monitor fish communities in wadeable streams in the Apalachicola and Atlantic Slope drainage basins of the Southeastern Plains ecoregion of Georgia. GDNR, Wildlife Resources Division, Fisheries Management Section, Atlanta. Available: www.georgiawildlife.com/node/913. ( October 2016).
   Google Scholar
• Gerritsen, J., B. Jessup, E. W. Leppo, and J. White. 2000. Development of lake condition indexes (LCI) for Florida. Tetra Tech, Owings Mills, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Griffith, G. E., J. M. Omernik, J. A. Comstock, S. Lawrence, G. Martin, A. Goddard, V. J. Hulcher, and T. Foster. 2001. Ecoregions of Alabama and Georgia. Two-sided color poster with map, descriptive text, summary tables, and photographs, scale 1:1,700,000. U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Grubbs, S. A., O. W. Meier, and A. J. Meier. 2007. Longitudinal patterns of fish assemblages in small unregulated subbasins: evaluating reach- and watershed-scale parameters. Hydrobiologia 592:211–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hain, E. F., S. A. C. Nelson, B. H. Tracy, and H. I. Cakir. 2012. Application of GIS techniques for developing a fish index of biotic integrity for an ecoregion with low species richness. Southeastern Naturalist 11:711–732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, J. H., and R. Silveira. 1999. Large-scale assessments of river health using an index of biotic integrity with low-diversity fish communities. Freshwater Biology 41:235–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan-Williams, C. T., H. Bonner, and C. Thomas. 2010. Texas freshwater fishes. Texas State University, Biology Department and Aquatic Station, San Marcos.
   Google Scholar
• Hering, D., R. K. Johnson, S. Kramm, S. Schmutz, K. Szosziewicz, and P. F. M. Verdonschot. 2006. Assessment of European streams with diatoms, macrophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish: a comparative metric-based analysis of organism response to stress. Freshwater Biology 51:1757–1785.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlihy, A. T., S. G. Paulsen, J. Van Sickle, J. L. Stoddard, C. P. Hawkins, and L. L. Yuan. 2008. Striving for consistency in a national assessment: the challenges of applying a reference-condition approach at a continental scale. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:860–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. M. 1995. Defining acceptable biological status by comparing with reference conditions. Pages 31–47 in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making for rivers and streams. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, R. M., P. R. Kaufmann, A. T. Herlihy, T. M. Kincaid, L. Reynolds, and D. P. Larsen. 1998. A process for developing and evaluating indices of fish assemblage integrity. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:1618–1631.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joy, M. K., and R. G. Death. 2004. Predictive modelling and spatial mapping of freshwater fish and decapod assemblages using GIS and neural networks. Freshwater Biology 49:1036–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaller, M. D., C. E. Murphy, W. E. Kelso, and M. R. Stead. 2013. Basins for fish and ecoregions for macroinvertebrates: different spatial scales are needed to assess Louisiana wadeable streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 142:767–782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6(6):21–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R., and D. R. Dudley. 1981. Ecological perspectives on water quality goals. Environmental Management 5:55–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karr, J. R., K. D. Fausch, P. L. Angermeier, P. R. Yant, and I. J. Schlosser. 1986. Assessing biological integrity in running waters: a method and its rationale. Illinois Natural History Survey, Special Publication 5, Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Klemm, D. J., K. A. Blocksom, F. A. Fulk, A. T. Herlihy, R. M. Hughes, P. R. Kaufmann, D. V. Peck, J. L. Stoddard, W. T. Thoeny, M. B. Griffith, and W. S. Davis. 2003. Development and evaluation of a macroinvertebrate biotic integrity index (MBII) for regionally assessing Mid-Atlantic Highlands streams. Environmental Management 31:656–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnicki, E., S. A. Sefick, M. H. Paller, M. S. Jarrell, B. A. Prusha, S. C. Sterrett, T. D. Tuberville, and J. W. Feminella. 2014. Defining the reference condition for wadeable streams in the Sand Hills subdivision of the Southeastern Plains ecoregion, USA. Environmental Management 53:494–504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosnicki, E., and R. W. Sites. 2007. Least-desired index for assessing the effectiveness of grass riparian filter strips in improving water quality in an agricultural region. Environmental Entomology 36:713–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowalyk, H. E. 1985. The larval cephalic setae in the Tanypodinae (Diptera: Chironomidae) and their importance in generic determinations. Canadian Entomologist 117:67–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, J. R., K. N. Bertrand, A. Kafle, and N. H. Troelstrup Jr. 2013. A fish index of biotic integrity for South Dakota’s northern Glaciated Plains ecoregion. Ecological Indicators 34:313–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loehle, C., T. B. Wigley, E. Schilling, V. Tatum, J. Beebe, E. Vance, P. van Deusen, and P. Weatherford. 2009. Achieving conservation goals in managed forests of the Southeastern Coastal Plain. Environmental Management 44:1136–1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzin, A., V. Archaimbault, J. Belliard, C. Chauvin, F. Delmas, and D. Pont. 2012. Ecological assessment of running waters: do macrophytes, macroinvertebrates, diatoms, and fish show similar responses to human pressures? Ecological Indicators 23:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, F. H., R. M. Hughes, P. R. Kaufmann, D. V. Peck, J. L. Stoddard, and A. T. Herlihy. 2001. Development of an index of biotic integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highlands region. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130:857–877.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meador, D., T. R. Whittier, R. M. Goldstein, R. M. Hughes, and D. V. Peck. 2008. Evaluation of an index of biotic integrity approach to assess fish assemblage condition in western USA streams and rivers at varying spatial scales. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 137:13–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt, R. W., K. W. Cummins, and M. B. Berg, editors. 2008. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 4th edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, C. C., P. M. Stewart, and T. P. Simon. 2007. Development of an index of biotic integrity for a Southeastern Coastal Plain watershed, USA. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 43:295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motulsky, H. 2005. GraphPad Prism, version 4.0, statistical guide: statistical analyses for laboratory and clinical researchers. GraphPad Software, San Diego, California.
   Google Scholar
• Mount, D. I., N. Thomas, M. Barbour, T. Norberg, T. Roush, and R. Brandes. 1984. Effluent and ambient toxicity testing and instream community response on the Ottawa River, Lima, Ohio. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA-600/3-84-080, Duluth, Minnesota.
   Google Scholar
• NCDENR (North Carolina Department of Environmental and Natural Resources). 2006. Standard operating procedure, biological monitoring, stream fish community assessment program. NCDENR, Division of Water Quality, Environmental Sciences Section, Biological Assessment Unit, Raleigh.
   Google Scholar
• Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of America Geographers 77:118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omernik, J. M. 1995. Ecoregions: a spatial framework for environmental management. Pages 49–62 in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simon, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Paller, M. H. 2001. Comparison of fish and macroinvertebrate bioassessments from South Carolina Coastal Plain streams. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 4:175–186.
   Google Scholar
• Paller, M., J. Feminella, E. Kosnicki, S. Sefick, M. Jarrell, T. Tuberville, D. Fletcher, A. Grosse, B. Harris, S. Sterrett, and B. Prusha. 2014a. Development of ecological reference models and an assessment framework for streams on the Atlantic Coastal Plain. Savannah River National Laboratory, SERDP Project RC-1694, Aiken, South Carolina.
   Google Scholar
• Paller, M. H., B. A. Prusha, D. E. Fletcher, E. Kosnicki, S. A. Sefick, M. S. Jarrell, S. C. Sterrett, A. M. Grosse, T. D. Tuberville, and J. W. Feminella. 2016. Factors influencing stream fish species composition and functional properties at multiple spatial scales in the Sand Hills of the southeastern United States. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 145:545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller, M. H., M. J. M. Reichert, and J. M. Dean. 1996. The use of fish communities to assess environmental impacts in South Carolina Coastal Plain streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 125:633–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paller, M. H., S. C. Sterrett, T. D. Tuberville, D. E. Fletcher, and A. M. Grosse. 2014b. Effects of disturbance at two spatial scales on macroinvertebrate and fish metrics of stream health. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 29:83–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterman, R. M. 1990. Statistical power analysis can improve fisheries research and management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 47:2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahel, F. J., and W. A. Hubert. 1991. Fish assemblages and habitat gradients in a Rocky Mountain–Great Plains stream: biotic zonation and additive patterns of community change. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 120:319–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhode, F. C., R. G. Arndt, J. W. Foltz, and J. M. Quattro. 2009. Freshwater fishes of South Carolina. University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, D. M., and V. H. Resh. 1996. Use of aquatic insects in biomonitoring. Pages 87–97 in R. W. Merritt and K. W. Cummins, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America, 3rd edition. Kendall/Hunt Publishing, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• SCDHEC (South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control). 1998. Standard operating and quality control procedures for macroinvertebrate sampling. SCDHEC, Technical Report 004-98, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiger, S. L. 2000. Use of an index of biotic integrity to detect effects of land uses on stream fish communities in west-central Georgia. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129:1118–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, M. C., and G. S. Helfman. 2001. Native invasions, homogenization, and the mismeasure of integrity of fish assemblages. Fisheries 26(11):6–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheldon, A. L. 1968. Species diversity and longitudinal succession in stream fishes. Ecology 49:193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1995. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edition. Freeman, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J. L., D. P. Larsen, C. P. Hawkins, R. K. Johnson, and R. H. Norris. 2006. Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: the concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16:1267–1276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoddard, J. L., D. V. Peck, A. R. Olsen, D. P. Larsen, J. Van Sickle, C. P. Hawkins, R. M. Hughes, T. R. Whittier, G. Lomnicky, A. T. Herlihy, P. R. Kaufmann, S. A. Peterson, P. L. Ringold, S. G. Paulsen, and R. Blair. 2005. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program (EMAP): western streams and rivers statistical summary. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA-620/R-05/006, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• SYSTAT Software. 2007. SYSTAT 12. SYSTAT Software, San Jose, California.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, J. H., and A. P. Covich, editors. 2009. Ecology and classification of North American freshwater invertebrates, 3rd edition. Academic Press, Burlington, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, L., J. Lyons, P. Rasmussen, P. Seelbach, T. Simon, M. Wiley, P. Kanehl, E. Baker, S. Niemela, and P. M. Stewart. 2003. Watershed, reach, and riparian influences on stream fish assemblages in the Northern Lakes and Forest ecoregion, USA. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 60:491–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M. L. Jr., B. M. Burr, S. J. Walsh, H. L. Bart Jr., R. C. Cashner, D. A. Etnier, B. J. Freeman, B. R. Kuhajda, R. L. Mayden, H. W. Robinson, S. T. Ross, and W. C. Starnes. 2000. Diversity, distribution, and conservation status of the native freshwater fishes of the southern United States. Fisheries 25(10):7–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittier, T. R., R. M. Hughes, J. L. Stoddard, G. A. Lomnicky, D. V. Peck, and A. T. Herlihy. 2007. A structured approach to developing indices of biotic integrity: three examples from western USA streams and rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 136:718–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoder, C. O., and E. T. Rankin. 1995. Biological response signatures and the area of degradation value: new tools for interpreting multimetric data. Pages 213–226 in W. S. Davis and T. P. Simons, editors. Biological assessment and criteria: tools for water resource planning and decision making. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida.
   Google Scholar