Risk Screen of Freshwater Tropical Ornamental Fishes for the Conterminous United States

REFERENCES

• Almeida, D., F. Ribeiro, P. M. Leunda, L. Vilizzi, and G. H. Copp. 2013. Effectiveness of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, to perform risk identification assessments in the Iberian Peninsula. Risk Analysis 33:1404–1413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ANSTF (Aquatic Nuisance Species Task Force). 1996. Generic nonindigenous aquatic organism risk analysis review process. ANSTF, Risk Assessment and Management Committee, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, J. R., G. H. Copp, M. Brazier, and G. D. Davies. 2011. A modular assessment tool for managing introduced fishes according to risks of species and their populations, and impacts of management actions. Biological Invasions 13:2847–2860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britton, J. R., and M. L. Orsi. 2012. Non-native fish in aquaculture and sport fishing in Brazil: economic benefits versus risks to fish diversity in the upper River Paraná basin. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22:555–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capps, K. A., and A. S. Flecker. 2013. Invasive aquarium fish transform ecosystem nutrient dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences 280:20131520.
   Google Scholar
• CEC (Commission for Environmental Cooperation). 2009. Trinational risk assessment guidelines for aquatic alien invasive species: test cases for the snakeheads (Channidae) and armored catfishes (Loricariidae) in North American inland waters. Commission for Environmental Cooperation, Montreal.
   Google Scholar
• CEFAS (Centre for Environment, Fisheries, and Aquaculture Science). 2016. Decision support tools for the identification and management of invasive non-native aquatic species. CEFAS, London. Available: https://www.cefas.co.uk/services/research-advice-and-consultancy/invasive-and-non-native-species/decision-support-tools-for-the-identification-and-management-of-invasive-non-native-aquatic-species/. (May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, D. S., T. Haynes, S. Beal, F. Essl, and J. M. Bullock. 2014. Phenology predicts the native and invasive range limits of common ragweed. Global Change Biology 20:192–202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, F. A., S. A. Fitz-Coy, E. M. Thurnberg, and C. M. Adams. 1997. United States of America trade in ornamental fish. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society 28:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G. H. 2013. The Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for non-native freshwater fishes—a summary of current applications. Risk Analysis 33:1394–1396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G. H., R. Garthwaite, and R. E. Gozlan. 2005. Risk identification and assessment of non-native freshwater fishes: a summary of concepts and perspectives on protocols for the UK. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 21:371–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G. H., I. C. Russell, E. J. Peeler, F. Gherardi, E. Tricarico, A. Macleod, I. G. Cowx, A. D. Nunn, A. Occhipinti-Ambrogi, D. Savini, J. Mumford, and J. R. Britton. 2016a. European non-native species in aquaculture risk analysis scheme—a summary of assessment protocols and decision support tools for use of alien species in aquaculture. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G. H., L. Vilizzi, J. Mumford, G. M. Fenwick, M. J. Godard, and R. E. Gozlan. 2009. Calibration of FISK, an invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Risk Analysis 29:457–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp, G. H., L. Vilizzi, H. Tidbury, P. D. Stebbing, A. S. Tarkan, L. Miossec, and P. Goulletquer. 2016b. Development of a generic decision-support tool for identifying potentially invasive aquatic taxa: AS-ISK. Management of Biological Invasions 7:343–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. R. Jr. 1997. Nonindigenous fishes. Pages 109–122 in D. Simberloff, D. C. Schmitz, and T. C. Brown, editors. Strangers in paradise: impact and management of nonindigenous species in Florida. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay, W. R. Jr., G. K. Meffe, and F. F. Snelson Jr. 1989. Small fishes in strange places: a review of introduced poeciliids. Pages 319–331 in G. K. Meffe and F. F. Snelson Jr., editors. Ecology and evolution of livebearing fishes (Poeciliidae). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, A. E., I. W. Ramnarine, and A. E. Magurran. 2011. How reproductive ecology contributes to the spread of a globally invasive fish. PLOS (Public Library of Science) ONE [online serial] 6(9):e24416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duggan, I. C., C. A. M. Rixon, and H. J. MacIssac. 2006. Popularity and propagule pressure: determinants of introduction and establishment of aquarium fish. Biological Invasions 8:377–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDACS (Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services). 2015. Aquaculture best management practices manual, September 2015. FDACS, Division of Aquaculture, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Ferincz, A., A. Staszny, A. Weiperth, P. Takács, B. Urbányi, L. Vilizzi, G. Paulovits, and G. H. Copp. 2016. Risk assessment of non-native fishes in the catchment of the largest Central-European shallow lake (Lake Balaton, Hungary). Hydrobiologia 780:85–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forneck, S. C., F. M. Dutra, C. E. Zacarkim, and A. M. Cunico. 2016. Invasion risks by non-native freshwater fishes due to aquaculture activity in a Neotropical stream. Hydrobiologia 773:193–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, P. 2003. Freshwater aquatic vertebrate introductions in the United States: patterns and pathways. Pages 123–151 in G. Ruiz and J. Carlton, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• FWC (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission). 2016. Florida’s exotic fish and wildlife. FWC, Tallahassee. Available: http://myfwc.com/wildlifehabitats/nonnatives/. (May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Gertzen, E., O. Familiar, and B. Leung. 2008. Quantifying invasion pathways: fish introductions from the aquarium trade. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 65:1265–1273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gestring, K. B., P. L. Shafland, and M. S. Stanford. 2010. Status of the exotic Orinoco Sailfin Catfish (Pterygoplichthys multiradiatus) in Florida. Florida Scientist 73:122–137.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, M., T. Futral, M. Mallinger, D. Martin, and M. Ross. 2010. Disturbance of the Florida manatee by an invasive catfish. Southeastern Naturalist 9:635–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glamuzina, B., P. Tutman, V. Nikolić, Z. Vidović, J. Pavlicevic, L. Vilizzi, G. H. Copp, and P. Simonović. 2017. Comparison of taxon-specific and taxon-generic risk screening tools to identify potentially invasive non-native fishes in the River Neretva catchment (Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia). River Research and Applications 33:670–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, S., and J. E. Hill. 2012. Risk analysis of Barramundi Perch Lates calcarifer aquaculture in Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 32:577–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, K. R., and S. C. Barry. 2008. Are there any consistent predictors of invasion success? Biological Invasions 10:483–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E. 2013. Regulations pertaining to non-native fish in Florida aquaculture. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Electronic Data Information Source, FA-121, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E. 2014. Review of the literature on the ecological risks of tropical ornamental fish in the United States. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Division of Aquaculture, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., A. R. Kapuscinski, and T. Pavlowich. 2011. Fluorescent transgenic Zebra Danio more vulnerable to predators than wild-type. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 140:1001–1005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., L. L. Lawson Jr., and S. Hardin. 2014. Assessment of the risks of transgenic fluorescent ornamental fishes to the United States using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 143:817–829.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., and K. M. Lawson. 2015. Risk screening of Arapaima, a new species proposed for aquaculture in Florida. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 35:885–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., and R. P. E. Yanong. 2010. Freshwater ornamental fish commonly cultured in Florida. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Electronic Data Information Source, Circular 54, Gainesville.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J. E., and P. Zajicek. 2007. National aquatic species risk analysis: a call for improved implementation. Fisheries 32:530–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, M. H. 2014. Standard operating procedures: rapid screening of species risk of establishment and impact in the U.S. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Branch of Aquatic Invasive Species, Fairfax, Virginia.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., K. J. Kilgore, and A. F. Cofrancesco. 2004. Suckermouth catfishes: threats to aquatic ecosystems of the United States? Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program Bulletin 4:1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, J. J., C. E. Murphy, and J. Kilgore. 2014. Ecological impacts of suckermouth catfishes (Loricariidae) in North America: a conceptual model. Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program Bulletin 14:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Howeth, J. G., C. A. Gantz, P. L. Angermeier, E. A. Frimpong, M. H. Hoff, R. P. Keller, N. E. Mandrak, M. P. Marchetti, J. D. Olden, C. M. Romagosa, and D. M. Lodge. 2016. Predicting invasiveness of species in trade: climate match, trophic guild and fecundity influence establishment and impact of non-native freshwater fishes. Diversity and Distributions 22:148–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins, P. T., K. Genovese, and H. Ruffler. 2007. Broken screens: the regulation of live animal imports in the United States. Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, R. P., and D. M. Lodge. 2007. Species invasions from commerce in live aquatic organisms: problems and possible solutions. BioScience 57:428–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, A. L., L. Fowler, L. P. Newton, and B. P. Caton. 2012. Development and validation of a weed screening tool for the United States. Biological Invasions 14:273–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, L. L. Jr., J. E. Hill, S. Hardin, L. Vilizzi, and G. H. Copp. 2015. Evaluation of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK v2) for peninsular Florida. Management of Biological Invasions 6:413–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, L. L. Jr., J. E. Hill, L. Vilizzi, S. Hardin, and G. H. Copp. 2013. Revisions of the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK) for its application in warmer climatic zones, with particular reference to peninsular Florida. Risk Analysis 33:1414–1431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livengood, E. J., N. Funicelli, and F. A. Chapman. 2014. The applicability of the U.S. Law Enforcement Management System (LEMIS) database for the protection and management of ornamental fish. AACL Bioflux 7:268–275.
   Google Scholar
• Maceda-Veiga, A., J. Escribano-Alacid, A. De Sostoa, and E. Garcia-Berthou. 2013. The aquarium trade as a potential source of fish introductions in southwestern Europe. Biological Invasions 15:2707–2716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marson, D., B. Cudmore, D. A. R. Drake, and N. E. Mandrak. 2009. Summary of a survey of aquarium owners in Canada. Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2905.
   Google Scholar
• Mastitsky, S. E., A. Y. Karatayev, L. E. Burlakova, and B. V. Adamovich. 2010. Non-native fishes of Belarus: diversity, distribution, and risk classification using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit (FISK). Aquatic Invasions 5:103–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDowall, R. M. 2004. Shoot first, and then ask questions: a look at aquarium fish imports and invasiveness in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 38:503–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendoza, R., S. Luna, and C. Aguilera. 2015. Risk assessment of the ornamental fish trade in Mexico: analysis of freshwater species and effectiveness of the FISK (Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit). Biological Invasions 17:3491–3502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nico, L., M. Neilson, and W. Loftus. 2016. Poecilia reticulata. U.S. Geological Survey Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database [online database]. USGS, Gainesville, Florida. Available: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/FactSheet.aspx?speciesID=863. (April 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Nico, L. G. 2010. Nocturnal and diurnal activity of armored suckermouth catfish (Loricariidae: Pterygoplichthys) associated with wintering Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Neotropical Ichthyology 8:893–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nico, L. G., P. L. Butt, G. R. Johnston, H. L. Jelks, M. Kail, and S. J. Walsh. 2012. Discovery of South American suckermouth armored catfishes (Loricariidae, Pterygoplichthys spp.) in the Santa Fe River drainage, Suwannee River basin, USA. Bioinvasions Records 1:179–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nico, L. G., H. L. Jelks, and T. Tuten. 2009a. Non-native suckermouth armored catfishes in Florida: description of nest burrows and burrow colonies with assessment of shoreline conditions. Aquatic Nuisance Species Research Program Bulletin 9:1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Nico, L. G., W. F. Loftus, and J. P. Reid. 2009b. Interactions between non-native armored suckermouth catfish (Loricariidae: Pterygoplichthys) and native Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) in artesian springs. Aquatic Invasions 4:511–519.
   Google Scholar
• Nico, L. G., J. D. Williams, and H. L. Jelks. 2005. Black Carp: biological synopsis and risk assessment of an introduced fish. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Onikura, N., J. Nakajima, R. Inui, H. Mizutani, M. Kobayakawa, S. Fukuda, and T. Mukai. 2011. Evaluating the potential for invasion by alien freshwater fishes in northern Kyushu Island, Japan, using the Fish Invasiveness Scoring Kit. Ichthyological Research 58:382–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, R. 2003. Generic nonindigenous aquatic organisms risk analysis review process. Pages 415–431 in G. M. Ruiz and J. T. Carlton, editors. Invasive species: vectors and management strategies. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, D. K., and S. L. Williams. 2004. Beyond ballast water: aquarium and ornamental trades as sources of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:131–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, M. C., B. L. Finlayson, and T. A. McMahon. 2007. Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 11:1633–1644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perdikaris, C., N. Koutsikos, L. Vardakas, D. Kommatas, P. Simonovic, I. Paschos, V. Detsis, L. Vilizzi, and G. H. Copp. 2016. Risk screening of non-native, translocated and traded aquarium freshwater fishes in Greece using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23:32–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pheloung, P. C., P. A. Williams, and S. R. Halloy. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. Journal of Environmental Management 57:239–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piria, M., M. Povž, L. Vilizzi, D. Zanella, P. Simonović, and G. H. Copp. 2016. Risk screening of non-native freshwater fishes in Croatia and Slovenia using the Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit. Fisheries Management and Ecology 23:21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntila, R., L. Vilizzi, M. Lehtiniemi, and G. H. Copp. 2013. First application of FISK, the freshwater Fish Invasiveness Screening Kit, in northern Europe: example of southern Finland. Risk Analysis 33:1397–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Range, I. L. 2013. Applicability of fish risk assessment (FISK) to ornamental species. Doctoral dissertation. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, M. J., F. G. Whoriskey, and L. H. Roy. 1995. Turbidity generation and biological impacts of an exotic fish Carassius auratus, introduced into shallow seasonally anoxic ponds. Journal of Fish Biology 47:576–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixon, C. A. M., I. C. Duggan, N. M. N. Bergeron, A. Ricciardi, and H. J. MacIssac. 2005. Invasion risks posed by the aquarium trade and live fish markets on the Laurentian Great Lakes. Biodiversity and Conservation 14:1365–1381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruesink, J. L. 2005. Global analysis of factors affecting the outcome of freshwater fish introductions. Conservation Biology 19:1883–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofield, P. J., and W. F. Loftus. 2015. Non-native fishes in Florida freshwaters: a literature review and synthesis. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 25:117–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shafland, P. L. 1996. Exotic fish assessments: an alternative view. Reviews in Fisheries Science 4:123–132.
   Google Scholar
• Simonović, P., A. Tošić, M. Vassilev, A. Apostolou, D. Mrdak, M. Ristovska, V. Kostov, V. Nikolić, D. Škraba, L. Vilizzi, and G. H. Copp. 2013. Risk assessment of non-native fishes in the Balkans region using FISK, the invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes. Mediterranean Marine Science 14:369–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. F., M. D. Behrens, L. M. Max, and P. Daszak. 2008. U.S. drowning in unidentified fishes: scope, implications, and regulation of live fish import. Conservation Letters 1:103–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strecker, A. L., P. M. Campbell, and J. D. Olden. 2011. The aquarium trade as an invasion pathway in the Pacific Northwest. Fisheries 36:74–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarkan, A. S., F. Güler Ekmekci, L. Vilizzi, and G. H. Copp. 2014. Risk screening of non-native freshwater fishes at the frontier between Asia and Europe: first application in Turkey of the fish invasiveness screening kit. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 30:392–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, K. A., J. E. Hill, and L. G. Nico. 2012. Eastern Mosquitofish resists invasion by nonindigenous poeciliids through agonistic behaviors. Biological Invasions 14:1515–1529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trexler, J. C., W. F. Loftus, F. Jordan, J. J. Lorenz, J. H. Chick, and R. M. Kobza. 2000. Empirical assessment of fish introductions in a subtropical wetland: an evaluation of contrasting views. Biological Invasions 2:265–277.
   Google Scholar
• Troca, D. F. A., and J. P. Vieira. 2012. Potential invasive non-native fish farmed in the coastal region of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Pesca 38:109–120. (In Portuguese with English abstract.)
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett, Q. M., J. L. Ritch, K. M. Lawson, and J. E. Hill. 2016a. Implementation of best management practices for Florida ornamental aquaculture with an emphasis on non-native species. North American Journal of Aquaculture 78:113–124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, Q. M., J. L. Ritch, K. M. Lawson, and J. E. Hill. 2017. Landscape-scale survey of non-native fishes near ornamental aquaculture facilities in Florida. Biological Invasions 19:223–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckett, Q. M., J. L. Ritch, K. M. Lawson, L. L. Lawson Jr., and J. E. Hill. 2016b. Phenotypic variation in cold tolerance in escaped and farmed non-native Green Swordtails (Xiphophorus hellerii) revealed by laboratory trials and field introductions. Biological Invasions 18:45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2016. Invasive species prevention. USFWS. Available: http://www.fws.gov/injuriouswildlife/Injurious_prevention.html. (May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2016. Nonindigenous Aquatic Species Database [online database].USGS, Gainesville, Florida. Available: http://nas.er.usgs.gov/. ( May 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Verbrugge, L. N. H., G. van der Velde, A. J. Hendriks, H. Verreycken, and R. S. E. W. Leuven. 2012. Risk classifications of aquatic non-native species: application of contemporary European assessment protocols in different biogeographical settings. Aquatic Invasions 7:49–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verreycken, H., G. Van Thuyne, and C. Belpaire. 2010. Non-indigenous freshwater fishes in Flanders: status, trends, and risk assessment. Pages 71–75 in H. Segers and E. Branquart, editors. Science facing aliens: proceedings of a scientific meeting on invasive alien species. Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Vilizzi, L., and G. H. Copp. 2013. Application of FISK, and invasiveness screening tool for non-native freshwater fishes, in the Murray–Darling basin (southeastern Australia). Risk Analysis 33:1432–1440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar