- Kurt W. Ritter , “Recapturing the Rhetorical Dimension: Debating in Campus Forums,” Speaker and Gavel , 12 (Fall, 1974), 2.
- John F. Schunk , “Maintaining the Logical Dimension: A Response to K. Ritter's ‘Recapturing the Rhetorial Dimension,’” Speaker and Gavel, 13 (Spring, 1976), 39.
- Lionel Crocker , Argumentation and Debate (New York: American Book Company, 1944), p. 48.
- Arthur N. Kruger , “The Inherent Need: Further Clarification,” Journal of the American Forensic Association , 2 (September, 1965), 112.
- Arthur N. Kruger , “The Meaning of Inherency,” Gavel , 45 (March, 1963), 54.
- Austin J. Freeley , Argumentation and Debate , 4th ed. (Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Company, 1976), p. 128.
- Wayne Brockriede and Douglas Ehninger , Decision by Debate , 2nd ed. (New York: Harper and Row, 1978), p. 164.
- Robert P. Newman , “The Inherent and Compelling Need,” Journal of the American Forensic Association , 2 (May, 1965), 69.
- Arthur N. Kruger , Modern Debate: Its Logic and Strategy (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960), p. 46.
- Tom Goodnight , Bill Balthrop , and Donn W. Parson , “The Problem of Inherency: Strategy and Substance,” Journal of the American Forensic Association , 10 (Spring, 1974), 240.
- Goodnight , Balthrop , and Parson , p. 231.
- Goodnight , Balthrop , and Parson , p. 230.
- Kruger , “The Inherent Need,” pp. 112–113.
- Thomas F. Mader , “The Inherent Need to Analyze Stasis,” Journal of The American Forensic Association , 4 (Winter, 1967), 13–14.
- David Zarefsky , “The Role of Causal Argument in Policy Controversies,” Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13 (Spring, 1977), 184.
- Douglas Ehninger and Wayne Brockriede , Decision by Debate (New York: Dodd, Mead, and Company, 1963), p. 225.
- Brockreide and Ehninger , 2d ed., pp. 164–165.
The Journal of the American Forensic Association
Volume 14, 1978 - Issue 3