References
- Allen, M. (1987). An extension of the subjective probability model. Paper presented at the Central States Speech Association Convention, St. Louis, Missouri.
- Beach, L. (1968). Probability magnitudes and conservative revision of subjective probabilities. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 57–63.
- Follert, V. (1981). Risk analysis: Its application to argumentation and decision-making. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 18, 99–108.
- Hample, D. (1977a). The Toulmin model and the syllogism. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 14, 1–9.
- Hample, D. (1977b). Testing of a model of value argument and evidence. Communication Monographs, 44, 106–120.
- Hample, D. (1978). Predicting immediate belief change and adherence to argument claims. Communication Monographs, 45, 219–228.
- Hample, D. (1980). A cognitive view of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 17, 151–158.
- Hollihan, T., Riley, P., & Baaske, K. (1985). The art of storytelling: An argument for the narrative perspective in academic debate. In J. Cox, M. Sillars, & G. Walker (Eds.), Argument and social practice: Proceedings of the Fourth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 807–826). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Howe, J. (1981). CEDA's objectives: Lest we forget. In D. Brownlee (Ed.), The philosophy and practice of CEDA. CEDA.
- McGuire, W. (1960). Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 356–353.
- Nowakowska, M. (1973). Language of motivation and language of actions. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
- Rieke, R. & Sillars, M. (1984). Argumentation and the decision making process (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman & Company.
- Rowland, R. (1986). The relationship between realism and debatabiiity in policy advocacy. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 125–134.
- Ulek, C. (1965). The use of probabilistic information in decision making (Psychological Institute Report No. 009–65). University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Ulek, C., & van der Heijden, L. (1967). Subjective likelihood functions and variations in the accuracy of probabilistic information processing (Psychological Institute Report No. E017-67). University of Leiden, The Netherlands.
- Wyer, R. (1974). Some implications of the ‘Socratic effect’ for alternative models of cognitive consistency. Journal of Personality, 42, 399–419.
- Wyer, R. & Goldberg, L. (1970). Probabilistic analysis of the relationship among beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Review, 77, 100–120.
- 1977 National Debate Tournament Final Debate, edited by S. Rives & J. Boaz. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 14, 10–52.
- 1979 National Debate Tournament Final Debate, edited by J. Boaz. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 16, 29–67.
- 1981 National Debate Tournament Final Debate, edited by J. Boaz. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 18, 17–59.
- 1985 National Debate Tournament Final Debate, edited by J. Boaz. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 22, 26–62.