6
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Debate Rules and the Future of Policy Debate

&
Pages 11-21 | Published online: 18 Dec 2017

  • Apple, W. , Streeter, L. A. & Krauss, R. M. (1979). Effects of pitch and speech rate on personal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37, 715–727.
  • Ashmore, T. M. (1981). The role of audience analysis in contemporary debate. The Forensic , 67, 21–27.
  • Boaz, J. K. (1984). A footnote to William South-worth's critique of the final round of the 1984 National Debate Tournament. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 21, 119–122.
  • Bourhis, J. (1982). Regulating the debate process. The Forensic , 68, 6–9.
  • Bradley, B. E. (1984). Fundamentals of Speech Communication: The Credibility of Ideas (4th ed.). Dubuque: William C. Brown.
  • Colbert, K. R. (1983). A survey of NDT committee rules and guidelines. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 19, 198–204.
  • Colbert, K. R. (1981). Speaking rates of N.D.T. finalists from 1968–1980. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 73–76.
  • Colbert, K. R. & Biggers, T. (1985). Why should we support debate? Journal of the American Forensic Association , 21, 237–240.
  • Decker, W. (1988, May 17). ADA Membership list. Presented at ADA annual meeting, Frederick, MD.
  • Dowling, R. E. (1981). Debate as a game, educational tool, and argument: an evaluation of theory and rules. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 17, 234–241.
  • Dempsey, R. H. & Hartmann, D. J. (1986). Emergent voting criteria and judicial impotence of critics. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 167–175.
  • Englert, R. M. (1986). Higher Education's evaluation politics. In Gove, S. K. & Stauffer, T. M. (Eds.) Policy controversies in higher education. New York: Greenwood.
  • Foulke, E. (1968). Listening comprehension as a function of word rate. Journal of Communication , 18, 198–206.
  • Foulke, E. & Sticht, T. G. (1969). A review on research on intelligibility and comprehension of compressed speech. Psychological Bulletin , 72, 50–62.
  • Goldhaber, G. R. & Weaver, C. H. (1968). Listener comprehension of compressed speech when the difficulty, rate of presentation and sex of the listener are varied. Speech Monographs , 35, 20–25.
  • Hample, D. (1981). Forensics research in the 1980s. The Forensic , 66, 20–25.
  • Herbeck, D. A. & Katsulas, J. P. (1985). The affirmative topicality burden: Any reasonable example of the resolution. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 21, 133–145.
  • Herbeck, D. A. & Katsulas, J. P. (1988). Rules on the substance of debate: A critique of the charter of the National Debate Tournament. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 24, 233–245.
  • Howe, J. H. (1979). Forensics in the 1970s—a retrospective analysis. Speaker and Gavel , 17, 15–19.
  • IPDS concludes its first season (1986, March). Extensions , p. 1.
  • Kogan, M. (1986). Education accountability: an analytic overview. London: Hutchinson.
  • Kovalcheck, K. (1979). Retrospective on forensics in the 1970s. Speaker and Gavel , 17, 31–33.
  • Lass, N. J. & Prater, C. E. (1973). A comparative study of listening rates preferences for oral reading and impromptu speaking tasks. Journal of Communication , 23, 95–102.
  • Louden, A. , Hennen, C. , & Panetta, E. (1988, March). Restructuring proposals for District VI tournaments: a working paper. A paper presented at ADA annual meeting, Frederick, MD.
  • Lucas, S. E. (1986). The Art of Public Speaking (2nd ed.). New York: Random House.
  • Lynch, J. (1979). Some reflections on debate in the 1970s. Speaker and Gavel , 17, 37–38.
  • Miller, N. , Maruyama, G. , Beaber, R. J. & Valone, K. (1976). Speed of speech and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 34, 615–624.
  • Mintues (1987, March 26). NDT Committee meeting, Normal, IL.
  • Morello, J. T. (1979). Intercollegiate debate: Ten years of sound and fury signifying nothing. Speaker and Gavel , 17, 39–42.
  • NDT Archives (1988). University Library, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
  • Parson, D. (Ed.). (1984). American forensics in perspective. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
  • Pinkus, C. (1983). Good talkers and the four commandments. Speaker and Gavel , 20, 43–47.
  • Rowland, R. C. (1986). The relationship between realism and debatability in policy advocacy. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 125–134.
  • Rowland, R. C. & Deatherage, S. (1988). The crisis in policy debate. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 24, 246–250.
  • Ruben, B. D. & Lederman, L. C. (1982). Instructional simulation gaming: validity, reliability and utility. Simulations & Games , 13, 233–244.
  • Snider, A. C. (1984). Games without frontiers: A design for communication scholars and forensic educators. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 20, 162–170.
  • Snow, N. (1987). Letter to the editor. AFA Newsletter , 9, 11–13.
  • Soenksen, R. & Graves, C. (1988, May). ADA 1987–1988: A survey of opinions. Paper presented to the American Debate Association meeting, Frederick, MD.
  • Southworth, W. (1984). Fourth judge critique. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 21, 53–56.
  • Standing rules of tournament procedure. (1989, May). American Debate Association.
  • Street, R. L., Jr. , & Brady, R. M. (1982). Speech rate acceptance ranges as a function of evaluative domain, listener speech rate, and communication context. Communication Monographs , 49, 290–308.
  • Weaver, C. H. (1972). Human listening. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.