Advanced search
Publication Cover
Argumentation and Advocacy Volume 28, 1991 - Issue 1
Submit an article Journal homepage
1
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Forum

Robert Trapp
(Forum Editor) ,
Robert E. RowlandUniversity of Kansas
,
J. Kevin BargeBaylor University
,
Pamela J. BenoitUniversity of Missouri
,
Robert C. RowlandUniversity of Kansas
&
J. Kevin BargeBaylor University
Pages 23-41 | Published online: 18 Dec 2017

Works Cited

  • Benoit, William L. and Pamela J. Benoit . “Everyday Argument Practices of Naive Social Actors.” In Wenzel Argument. 465–73.
  • Blair , J. Anthony . “Everyday Argumentation from an Informal Logic Perspective.” In Wenzel Argument. 177–83.
  • Brockriede, Wayne . “Argument as Epistemological Method.” Argumentation as a Way of Knowing. Ed. David A. Thomas . Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980. 128–34.
  • Burleson, Brant R. “The Senses of Argument Revisited: Prolegomena To Future Characterizations of Argument.” Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation. Ed. George Ziegelmueller and Jack Rhodes . Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1987. 955–79.
  • Campbell, Joseph . Myths To Live By . New York: Viking, 1972.
  • Cusella, Louis P. “Conceptual Issues in Organizational Communication Research: Elements of a Model of Conceptual Authenticity.” Communication Quarterly 32 (1984): 293–300.
  • Ehninger, Douglas . “Argument as Method: Its Nature, Its Limitations and Its Uses.” Speech Monographs 37 (1970): 101–10.
  • Eliade, Mircea . Myth and Reality. Trans. Willard R. Trask . New York: Harper & Row, 1963.
  • Gouran, Dennis W. and Randy Y. Hirokawa . “Counteractive Functions of Communication in Effective Group Decision-making.” Communication and Group Decision-making. Ed. Randy Y. Hirokawa and Marshall Scott Poole . Beverly Hills CA: Sage, 1986. 81–92.
  • Grootendorst, Rob . “Everyday Argumentation from a Speech Act Perspective.” Wenzel Argument. 165–75.
  • Hample, Dale . “The Functions of Argument.” In Zarefsky et al 560–75.
  • Infante, Dominic A. Arguing Constructively . Prospect Heights IL: Waveland, 1988.
  • Jackson, Sally . “The Arguer in Interpersonal Argument: Pros and Cons of Individual-Level Analysis.” In Zarefsky et al 631–37.
  • Jackson, Sally and Scott Jacobs . “The Collaborative Production of Proposals in Conversational Argument and Persuasion: A Study of Disagreement Regulation. “ Journal of the American Forensic Association 18 (1981): 77–90.
  • Jackson, Sally and Scott Jacobs . “Structure of Conversational Argument: Pragmatic Bases for the Enthymeme.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 66 (1980): 251–65.
  • Jackson, Sally , Scott Jacobs , Nancy Burrell and Mike Allen . “Characterizing Ordinary Argument: Substantive and Methodological Issues.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 23 (1986): 42–57.
  • Jacobs, Scott and Sally Jackson . “Argument as a Natural Category: The Routine Grounds for Arguing in Conversation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 45 (1981): 118–32.
  • Jacobs, Scott and Sally Jackson . “Conversational Argument: A Discourse Analytic Approach.” Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research. Ed. J. Robert Cox and Charles Arthur Willard . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982. 205–37.
  • Johnstone, Henry W., Jr . “The Relevance of Rhetoric to Philosophy and of Philosophy to Rhetoric.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 52 (1966): 41–46.
  • McKerrow, Ray E. “Senses of Argument: Uses and Limitations of the Concept.” Dimensions of Argument: Proceedings of the Second Summer Conference on Argumentation. Ed. George Ziegelmueller and Jack Rhodes . Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1981. 980–87.
  • O'Keefe, Barbara J. and Pamela J. Benoit . “Children's Arguments.” Advances in Argumentation Theory and Research. Ed. J. Robert Cox and Charles Arthur Willard . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1982. 154–83.
  • O'Keefe, Daniel J. “Two Concepts of Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 13 (1977): 121–28.
  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey . “Management As Symbolic Action: The Creation and Maintenance of Organizational Paradigms.” Research in Organizational Behavior. Vol. 3. Ed. Larry L. Cummings and Barry M. Staw . Greenwich CT: JAI, 1981. 1–52.
  • Rescher, Nicholas . Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge . Albany: State University of New York Press, 1977.
  • Rowland, Robert C. “On Defining Argument.” Philosophy and Rhetoric 20 (1987): 140–64.
  • Trapp, Robert . “Everyday Argumentation from an Interpretive Perspective.” In Wenzel Argument. 185–90.
  • Trapp, Robert . “Generic Characteristics of Argumentation in Everyday Discourse.” In Zarefsky et al 516–30.
  • Trapp, Robert . “The Role of Disagreement in Interactional Argument.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 23 (1986): 23–41.
  • Trapp, Robert . “Special Report on Argumentation: Introduction.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 45 (1981): 111–17.
  • Trapp, Robert and Pamela J. Benoit . “An Interpretive Perspective on Argumentation: A Research Editorial.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 51 (1987): 417–30.
  • Trapp, Robert and Nancy Hoff . “A Model of Serial Argument in Interpersonal Relationships.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 22 (1985): 1–11.
  • Trapp, Robert , Nancy Hoff and Kelly Chandler . “Argument in Interpersonal Communication.” Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Boston, November 1987.
  • Wenzel, Joseph , Ed. Argument and Critical Practices: Proceedings of the Fifth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation. Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1987.
  • Wenzel, Joseph , Ed. “In Defense of Criticism.” Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association Convention. Louisville, November 1982.
  • Willard, Charles Arthur . “Epistemological Functions of Argument Studies: A Constructivist/Interactionist View.” Argumentation as a Way of Knowing. Ed. David A. Thomas . Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1980. 9–29.
  • Zarefsky, David , Malcolm O. Sillars and Jack Rhodes , eds. Argument in Transition: Proceedings of the Third Summer Conference on Argumentation. Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association, 1983.

References

  • Benoit, P. J. , & Benoit, W. L. (1990). To argue or not to argue. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation: Essays in honor of Wayne Brockriede (pp. 55–72). Prospect Heights IL: Waveland.
  • Farrell, T. B. (1990). From the Parthenon to the bassinet: Death and rebirth along the epistemic trail. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 76, 78–84.
  • Gross, A. G. (1990). Rhetoric of science is epistemic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 76, 304–306.
  • Hample, D. (1983). The functions of argument. In D. Zarefsky , M. O. Sillars , & J. Rhodes (Eds.), Argument in transition: Proceedings of the third summer conference on argumentation (pp. 560–575). Annandale VA: Speech Communication Association.
  • Jacobs, S. , & Jackson, S. (1981). Argument as a natural category: The routine grounds for arguing in conversation. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 45, 118–132.
  • Rowland, R. C. , & Barge, J. K. (1991). On interactional argument. Argumentation and Advocacy , 28, 24–34.
  • Scott, R. L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal , 18, 9–16.
  • Scott, R. L. (1990). Epistemic rhetoric and criticism: Where Barry Brummett goes wrong. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 76, 300–303.
  • Trapp, R. (1989). Interpersonal argumentation: Conflict and reason-giving. Communication Reports , 2, 105–109.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.