Political Debates as Televisual Form

References

• Allen, R. (1985). Speaking of soap operas . Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, R. (1987). Reader-oriented criticism and television. In R. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse (pp. 74–112. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. , & Meyer, T. (1988). Mediated communication . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. , Meadow, R. , & Jackson-Beeck, M. (1980). Introduction. In G. Bishop , R. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.), The presidential debates (pp. 1–28. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. , Olendick, R. , & Tuckfarber, A. (1980). The presidential debates as a device for increasing the “rationality” of electoral behavior. In G. Bishop , R. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.) The presidential debates (pp. 179–198. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Black, E. (1977). The sentimental style as escapism, or the devil with Dan'l Webster. In K.K. Campbell & K. Jamieson (Eds.), Form and genre (pp. 5–26. Washington, DC: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, J. , Fine, M. , & Davis, L. (1983). The 1980 Republican primary debates: The transformation of actor to scene. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 69, 25–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braden, W. (1983). The oral tradition in the south . Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brundson, C. (1983). Crossroads: Notes on a soap opera. In E. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television (pp. 76–83. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1931/1968). Counter-statement . Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1937/1961). Attitudes toward history . Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1950/1969). A rhetoric of motives . Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1976). The party line. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 62, 62–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, M. , & Pingree, J. (1983). The soap opera . Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, J. (1989). Communication as culture . Boston: Unwin Hyman.
   Google Scholar
• Chaffee, S. (1978). Presidential debates—are they helpful to voters? Communication Monographs , 45, 330–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1981). Agon and form. Central States Speech Journal , 32, 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1983). The Moral Majority and the rhetoric of romance. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 69, 159–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1984). Phases, pentads and dramatistic critical process. Central States Speech Journal , 35, 94–104.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1972). Towards a semiotic inquiry into the TV message. In J. Corner & J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Communication studies (pp. 103–126. London: Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, J. (1982). Visible fictions . London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, J. (1965). Rationality and campaigning: A content analysis of the 1960 presidential campaign debates. Western Political Quarterly , 18, 794–802.
   Google Scholar
• Feuer, J. (1983). The concept of live television. In E. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television (pp. 12–22. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. (1987). Television culture . London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Fiske, J. , & Hartley, D. (1978). Reading television . London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Flitterman-Lewis, S. (1983). The real soap operas. In E. Kaplan (Ed.), Regarding television (pp. 84–95. Frederick, MD: University Publications of America.
   Google Scholar
• Frye, N. (1957). Anatomy of criticism . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Germond, J. W. , & Witcover, J. (1979). Presidential debates: An overview. In A. Ranney (Ed.), The past and future of presidential debates (pp. 191–201. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gitlin, T. (1982). Prime time ideology: The hegemonic process in television entertainment. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: The critical view (3rd ed., pp. 426–454). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. (1984). Processing the news . New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. (1986). On postmodernism and articulation. Journal of Communication Inquiry , 10, 45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. (1979). Kenneth Burke on form. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 65, 392–04.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Highlander, J. , & Watkins, L. (1962). A closer look at the debates. Western Speech , 26, 39–18.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1988). Eloquence in an electronic age . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1991, November). [ Rhetorical strategies in the 1990 Helms-Gantt U.S. Senatorial Campaign. ] Presentation at the Speech Communication Association Convention, Atlanta, GA.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. (1988). Presidential debates . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnstone, H. (1970). The problem of the self . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kane, P. (1966). Evaluating the “great debates.” Western Speech , 30, 89–96.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, C. , & Conrad, C. (1985, August). Epideictic and rhetorical form: The Hunt-Helms debates. Paper presented at the Conference on Argumentation, Alta, UT.
   Google Scholar
• Kellner, D. (1982). TV, ideology, and emancipatory popular culture. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: The critical view (3rd ed., pp. 386–421). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kozoloff, S. R. (1988). Narrative theory and television. In R. Allen (Ed.), Channels of discourse (pp. 42–73. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, G. , & Davis, D. (1981). Political debates. In D. Nimmo & K. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of political communication (pp. 273–298. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• MacCabe, C. (1981). Theory and film. Screen , 17, 7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Manoff, R. (1986). Writing the news. In R. Manoff & M. Schudson (Eds.), Reading the news (pp. 197–229. New York: Pantheon.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, M. (1986). The television news: Personality and credibility. In T. Modleski (Ed.), Studies in entertainment (pp. 55–79. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nimmo, D. , & Combs, J. (1983). Mediated political realities . New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Nimmo, D. , Mansfield, M. , & Curry, J. (1980). Persistence and change in candidate images. In G. Bishop , R. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck (Eds.) The presidential debates (pp. 140–156. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• [ Commentary on the U.S. Senate Race ], (1984, April 4). North Carolina Independent , p. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, M. (1982). Television shapes the soul. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: The critical view (3rd ed., pp. 335–385). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1963). Act and person in argument. In C. Perelman , The idea of justice and the problem of argument (pp. 168–195A). New York: The Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• (1984, July 30). Transcript of the Senatorial Debate. Raleigh News and Observer , pp. Al, A3, B1.
   Google Scholar
• (1984, September 10). Transcript of the Senatorial Debate. Raleigh News and Observer , pp. A7, A8.
   Google Scholar
• (1984, October 14). Transcript of the Senatorial Debate. Raleigh News and Observer , pp. A10, A19.
   Google Scholar
• Riley, P. , & Hollihan, T. (1981). The 1980 presidential debates: A content analysis of the issues and arguments. Speaker and Gavel , 18, 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, R. (1986). The substance of the 1980 Carter-Reagan debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal , 51, 142–165.
   Google Scholar
• Samovar, L. (1962). Ambiguity and equivocation in the Kennedy-Nixon television debates. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 43, 277–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seider, E. (1983). Money, sex, and men. Journal of University Home and Video Association , 35, 69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, L. D. , & Golden, J. (1988). Electronic storytelling in electoral politics: An anecdotal analysis of television advertising in the Helms-Hunt senate race. Southern Speech Communication Journal , 52, 244–258.
   Google Scholar
• Snider, W. (1985). Hunt & Helms . Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sperry, S. (1976). Television news as narrative. In R. Adler & D. Cater (Eds.) Television as a cultural force (pp. 129–146. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, D. (1987, March). Melodrama as central form. Paper presented at the National Humanities Center Symposium on Media and History, Durham, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Thorburn, D. (1976). Television melodrama. In H. Newcomb (Ed.), Television: The critical view (3rd ed., pp. 628–644). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vancil, D. , & Pendell, S. (1984). Winning presidential debates. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 48, 62–74.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, P. (1976, August 29). Captives of melodrama. New York Times Magazine , pp. 6, 48, 50–51, 54, 56–57.
   Google Scholar
• Werling, D. , Salvador, M. , Sillars, M. , & Vaughn, M. (1987). Presidential debates. In M. Sillars (Ed.), Proceedings of the conference on argumentation (pp. 229–247. Salt Lake City: Department of Communication, University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, R. (1974). Television . London: Fontana.
   Google Scholar