REFERENCES
- Brownlee, D. (1984). The value of competition: A reply to Rowland. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 20, 116–119.
- Congalton, K. J. , & Olson, C. D. (1995). Electronic research: The impact on arguments in individual events. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values, Proceedings from the 9th SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 143–145). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: U of California P.
- Harris, S. L. (1995). The changing face of community: The impact of electronic list-servs on argument within the debate community. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values, Proceedings from the 9th SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 128–132). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- Harris, S. L. , & Rowland, R. C. (1993). Post-modernism, argumentation, and praxis: A case study of academic debate. In R. E. McKerrow (Ed.), Argument and the Postmodern Challenge, Proceedings from the 8th SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 31–35). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
- McDermott, J. J. (Ed.). (1977). The writings of William James: A comprehensive edition. Chicago: U of Chicago P.
- Minutes from the November 17, 1995 National Debate Tournament Committee Meeting. Available from the NDT Web Page at http://iscsun.uni.edu/ndt/minl9596.html
- Phillips, K. R. (1996). The spaces for public dissension: Reconsidering the public sphere. Communication Monographs , 63, 231–248.
- Simerly, G. (1995, November). Tuna's SCA paper. [On Line]. Available at gopher//beluga.uvm.edu.
- Selznick, P. (1995, November 5). Thinking about community: Ten theses. Society , 32(5), 33–37.
- Wastyn, R. , & Stables, G. (1995). The influence of electronic databases on contemporary debate practice: Considerations of argument selection, fiat, and evidentiary standards. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and Values, Proceedings from the 9th SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 139–142). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association. FORUM