Negotiating a Change in the Argumentation Course: Teaching Cooperative Argument

REFERENCES

• Arnold, M. (1932). Culture and anarchy ( J. D. Wilson , Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, A. C. (1928). Public discussion and debate . Boston: Ginn & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Bartanen, M. D. , & Frank, D. A. (1991). Debating values . Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch Scarisbrick.
   Google Scholar
• Baskerville, B. (1963). The cross and the flag: Evangelists of the far right. Western Speech , 27, 197–206.
   Google Scholar
• Booth, W. C. (1974). Modern dogma and the rhetoric of assent . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brockriede, W. (1975). Where is argument? Journal of the American Forensic Association , 77, 179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, K. (1987). The effects of CEDA and NDT debate on critical thinking. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 23, 194–201.
   Google Scholar
• Colbert, K. , & Biggers, T. (1985). Why should we support debate? Journal of the American Forensic Association , 21, 237–240.
   Google Scholar
• Colburn, C. W. (1972). Strategies for educational debate . Boston: Holbrook.
   Google Scholar
• Crusius, T. W. , & Channeil, C. E. (1995). The aims of argument: A brief rhetoric . Mountain View, CA: May- field Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Darsey, J. (1997). The prophetic tradition and radical rhetoric in America . New York: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A. (1981). Analyzing negotiation tactics: Development of a negotiation interact system. Human Communication Research , 7, 273–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donohue, W. A. (1978). An empirical framework for examining negotiation processes and outcomes. Communication Monograph , 45, 249–257.
   Google Scholar
• Ehninger, D. , & Brockriede, W. (1963). Decision by debate . New York: Dodd, Mead.
   Google Scholar
• Freeley, A. J. (1990). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making (7th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. M. (1993). Pathos reconsidered from the perspective of classical Chinese rhetorical theories. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 79, 19–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehrke, P. J. (1998). Teaching argumentation existentially: Argumentation pedagogy and theories of rhetoric as epistemic. Argumentation and Advocacy , 30, 76–86.
   Google Scholar
• Gulley, H. (1942). Debate versus discussion. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 28, 305–307.
   Google Scholar
• Guyer, M. , & Rapoport, A. A. (1970). Threat in a two-person game. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 6, 11–25.
   Google Scholar
• Haiman, F. S. (1967). The rhetoric of the streets: Some legal and ethical considerations. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 53, 99–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harnack, R. V. (1951). Competition and cooperation. Central States Speech Journal , 3(1), 15–20.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffer, R. (1963). The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass movements. New York: Time. (Original work published 1942)
   Google Scholar
• Hollihan, T. A. , & Baaske, K. T. (1998). Arguments and arguing: The product and process of human decision making . Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Inch, E. S. , & Warnick, B. (1997). Critical thinking in communication: The use of reason in argument (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Klopf, D. W. , & Cambra, R. E. (1979). Academic debate: Practicing argumentative theory (2nd ed.). Denver, CO: Morton.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. , & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by . Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makau, J. M. (1996). Notes on communication education and social justice. Communication Studies , 47, 135–141.
   Google Scholar
• Makau, J. M. (1992a). Raising consciousness in the classroom. Paper presented at the Second National Communication Ethics Conference, Kalamazoo, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Makau, J. M. (1992b). Revisioning the argumentation course. Women's Studies in Communication , 15, 79–91.
   Google Scholar
• Makau, J. M. (1990). Reasoning and communication: Thinking critically about arguments . Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Matlon, R. J. , & Keele, L. M. (1984). A survey of participants in the National Debate Tournament, 1947–1980. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 20, 194–205.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, B. R. (1998). Rehabilitating emotion: The troublesome case of the Ku Klux Klan. Argumentation and Advocacy , 34, 173–188.
   Google Scholar
• McKean, D. D. (1934). Debate or conference? Quarterly Journal of Speech , 20, 222–236.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. R. (1998). Pedagogical possibilities for argumentative agency in academ.ic debate. Argumentation and Advocacy , 35, 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, A. (1942). The discussion-debate duality. Southern Speech Bulletin , 7, 100–102.
   Google Scholar
• Nierenberg, G. I. (1995). The art of negotiating . New York: Barnes & Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, J. W. , & Zarefsky, D. (1982). Contemporary debate . Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. , Thomas, D. A. , & Ulrich, W. (1987). Debate and argument: A systems approach to advocacy . Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. , & Jones, T. S. (1982a). Reciprocity in negotiations: An analysis of bargaining interaction. Communication Monograph , 49, 171–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, L. L. , & Jones, T. S. (1982b). The role of communication in bargaining. Human Communication Research , 8, 262–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renz, M. A. (1987). Argumentative form and negotiating strategy in three United Nations Security Council debates. Central States Speech Journal , 38, 166–180.
   Google Scholar
• Rieke, R. D. , & Sillars, M. O. (1984). Argumentation and the decisionmaking process (2nd ed.). Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman & Co.
   Google Scholar
• Rothwell, J. D. (1971). Verbal obscenity: Time for second thoughts. Western Speech , 35, 231–242.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, J. , & Brown, B. (1975). The social psychology of bargaining and negotiation . New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. (1960). The strategy of conflict. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press
   Google Scholar
• Scott, R. L. , & Smith, D. K. (1969). The rhetoric of confrontation. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 55, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, D. W. (1955). Some observations on high school discussion. Speech Teacher , 4, 191–195.
   Google Scholar
• Simerly, G. , & McGee, B. R. (1991). A conceptual schema for assessing the educational function of a forensics program. Speech and Theatre Association of Missourijournal , 21, 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Moving from debate to dialogue . New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. N. (1979). The early history of the National Contest in Public Discussion. Communication Education , 28, 104–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. N. (1971). Modern argumentation and debate: Principles and practices . New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, W. N. (1944). Discussion and debate: A re-examination. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 30, 288–299.
   Google Scholar
• Thonssen, L. (1939). The social values of discussion and debate. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 25, 113–117.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, D. B. (1990). Intraorganizational bargaining: The effect of goal congruence and trust on negotiator strategy use. Communication Studies , 41, 54–75.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, R. E. , & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations: An analysis of a social interaction system . New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Windt, T. O. Jr . (1972). The diatribe: Last resort for protest. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 58, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, J. T. (1993). Diversity & commonality: Sustaining their tension in communication courses. Western Journal of Communication , 57, 367–380.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, R. V. , & Goodnight, L. (1990). Strategic debate (4th ed.). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegelmueller, G. , Kay, J. , & Dause, C. (1990). Argumentation: Inquiry and advocacy (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar