Inaccuracies in Media Coverage of the 1996 and 2000 Presidential Debates

References

• Apple, R. W. (1996a, October 17). A spicier mix, but will the voters bite? New York Times , p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Apple, R. W. (1996b, October 7). Is that glass half empty, or half full? New York Times , p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Blaney, J. R. , & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Brazeal, L. M. (in press). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Harthcock, A. (1999). Functions of the Great Debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defense in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , Brazeal, L. M. , McHale, J. P. , Klyukovksi, A. , & Airne, D. (in press). The primary decision: A functional analysis of presidential primary debates , 1948–2000. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , McHale, J. P , Hansen, G. J. , & McGuire, J. P. (in progress). Campaign 2000: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Wells, W. T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. , & Rueter, T. (1980). Carter vs Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, D. (1996, October 7). NBC Nightly News (Burrelle's Transcripts).
   Google Scholar
• Broder, D. S. , & Harris, J. F. (1996, October 7). Clinton, Dole stress differences: Debate highlights rival campaign themes, often echoing ads and speeches. Washington Post , p. Al.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. P. (1989). A defense of the “debate” in presidential debates. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 25, 208–213.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B. , & McKinney, M. S. (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. Westport, CT: Praeger
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. (2000). Televised election debates: International perspectives. London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devlin, L. P. (1977). Contrasts in presidential campaign commercials of 1972. Central States Speech Journal , 28, 238–249.
   Google Scholar
• Domke, D. , Fan, D. P. , Fibison, M. , Shah, D. V. , Smith, S. S. , & Watts, M. D. (1997). News media, candidates and issues, and public opinion in the 1996 presidential campaign. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly , 74, 718–737.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R V. (1994). Rhetorical studies of national political debates-1960-1992. 2nd edition Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R. V. (1997). Rhetorical studies of national political debates-1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Geer, J. G. (1988). The effects on presidential debates on the electorate's preference on candidates. American Politics Quarterly , 16, 486–501.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, R. P. (2000). Campaign talk: Why elections are good for us. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, E. A. (1993). Enacting the presidency: Political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Jacques, W. , Meilinger, F. , Balmoris, M. , Gems, C. , & Denby, S. (1993). Some aspects of major newspaper coverage of the 1992 presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist , 37, 252–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. (1987). Television, presidential campaigns, and debates. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.), Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. 27–33). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Joslyn, R.A. (1980). The content of political spot ads. Journalism Quarterly , 57, 92–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaid, L. L. , & Johnston, A. (1991). Negative versus positive television advertising in U.S. presidential campaigns, 1960–1988. Journal of Communication , 41, 53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, S. (1983). Interpreting elections. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, K. E. (1997). The 1996 Clinton-Dole presidential debates: Through media eyes. In R. V. Friedenberg (Ed.), Rhetorical studies of national political debates 1996 (pp. 1–29). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, M. (1989). 30 second politics: Political advertising in the eighties. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, P. (1995, October 28). Presidential debates and democracy. C-SPAN.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrica , 33, 159–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, G. E. , & Lang, K. (1980). The formation of public opinion: Direct and mediated effects of the first debate. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck , (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and polity perspectives (pp. 61–80). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Lanoue, D. J. , & Schrott, P. R. (1991). The joint press conference: The history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichter, S. R. , & Noyes, R. E. (1995). Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Lichter, S. R. , Noyes, R. E. , & Kaid, L. L. (1999). No news or negative news: How the networks nixed the '96 campaign. In L. L. Kaid & D. G. Bystrom (Eds.), The electronic election: Perspectives on the 1996 campaign communication (pp. 3–13). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Maraniss, D. , (1996, October 7). With “zingers,” Dole tactic is polite aggression. Washington Post , p. A1.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, R. (1962). National TV debates and presidential voting decisions. Public Opinion Quarterly , 26, 426–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, A. H. , & MacKuen, M. (1979). Learning about the candidates: The 1976 presidential debates. Public Opinion Quarterly , 43, 326–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, B. (1996, October 17). Dole on offense in debate. USA Today , p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Nielson Media Research. (1993). Nielsen tunes into politics: Tracking he presidential years (1960–1992). New York: Nielson Media Research.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, D. (1995). The debate challenge: Candidate strategies in the new media age. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.) Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problems (pp. 135–155). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Page, S. , & Lawrence, J. (1996, October 7). Debaters clash over vision: Rivals cite fundamental differences. USA Today , p. 1A.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, T. E. (1980). The mass media election: How Americans choose their president. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, B. H. , & Benoit, W. L. (in press). Accentuate the negative: New Hampshire presidential primary debates and newspaper coverage. Newspaper Research Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. J. , & Sheehan, M. A. (1983). Over the wire and on tv: CBS and UPI in campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rudd, R. (1986). Issues as image in political campaign commercials. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 50, 102–118.
   Google Scholar
• Rutenberg, J. (2000, October 5). The 2000 Campaign: The ratings; TV audience for debate is smaller than expected. New York Times , p. A30.
   Google Scholar
• Sears, D. O. , & Chaffee, S. H. (1979). Uses and effects of the 1976 debates: An overview of empirical studies. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Carter vs. Ford , 1976 (pp. 223–261). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steeper, F. T. (1980). Public response to Gerald Ford's statements on Eastern Europe in the second debate. In G. F. Bishop , R. G. Meadow , & M. Jackson-Beeck , (Eds.), The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives (pp. 81–101). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Wayne, S.J. (1992). The road to the White House 1992: The politics of presidential elections. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, W. T. (2000). An analysis of attacking, acclaiming and defending strategies in the 1976–1984 presidential debates. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Missouri, Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• West, D. M. (1997). Air wars: Television advertising in election campaigns 1952–1996. 2nd edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zakahi, W. R. , & Hacker, K. L. (1995). Televised presidential debates and candidate images. In K. L. Hacker , (Ed.), Candidate images in presidential elections (pp. 99–122). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar