Rhetorical Traction: Definitions and Institutional Arguments in Judicial Opinions About Wilderness Access

Works Cited

• Administrative Procedures Act. Pub. L. 85–791. August 28, 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act Pub. L. 96–487. December 2, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Alaska State Snowmobile Association et al. v. Babbitt. 1999 U.S. Dist LEXIS 21148. D. Alaska 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Thomas . “The Incarceration of Wildness: Wilderness Areas as Prisons.” Environmental Ethics 12 (1990): 3–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act. Pub. L. 95–495. October 21, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Callicott, J. Baird , and Robert Nelson , eds. The Great New Wilderness Debate. Athens, GA: U of Georgia Press, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Citizens to Preserve Overton Park , Inc. v. Volpe. 401 U.S. 402, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, Robert . E-mail to the author. October 23, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, Cornell W. “Separate Branches—Separate Politics: Judicial Enforcement of Congressional Intent.” Political Science Quarterly 109.5 (Winter 1994): 843–873.
   Google Scholar
• Cloud, Dana . “Hegemony or Concordance? The Rhetoric of Tokenism in Oprah Winfrey's Rags-to-Riches Biography,” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 13.2 (June 1996): 115–137.
   Google Scholar
• Condit, Celeste . “Hegemony in a Mass-Mediated Society: Concordance about Reproductive Technologies.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 11.3 (September 1994): 205–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dow, Bonnie J. “Hegemony, Feminist Criticism and The Mary Tyler Moore Show.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7.3 (September 1990): 261–274.
   Google Scholar
• Doxtader, Erik . “Learning Public Deliberation Through the Critique of Institutional Argument” Argumentation and Advocacy 31.4 (Spring 1995): 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. Robertson. 770 F.Supp. 1385. D. Minn. 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness v. Robertson. 978 F.2d 1484. 8th Cir. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Gauna, Joe . “Denali Park Access: Next Major Issue Facing Snowmobilers.” Alaskan Snow Rider , October 1997 <http://www.off-road.com/snowmobile/landuse/denali/denalinov97/denalinov97.html>. Accessed August 23, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Gramsci, Antonio . Selections from the Prison Notebooks. Trans. Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith . New York: International Publishers, 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Greater Yellowstone Coalition. “Bush Administration Sides with Snowmobile Industry, Delays Relief for Yellowstone's Wildlife, Air Quality, and Quiet.” <http://www.greateryellowstone.org/snowmobiles_bush.html>. Accessed October 18, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gruver, Mead . “Park Service in favor of phasing out snowmobiles.” The Missoulian October 11, 2000: B1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Hanke, Robert . “Hegemonic Masculinity in thirtysomething.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 7.3 (September 1990): 231–248.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Elise S. , and Cameron P. Taylor . “Litigating Agency Change: The Impact of the Courts and Administrative Appeals Process on the Forest Service.” Policy Studies Journal 23.2 (1995): 310–336.
   Google Scholar
• Komarnitsky, S. J. “Park presses snowmachine ban.” Anchorage Daily News November 10, 1999: 1B
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, Michael . “The Wilderness Act of 1964: Its Background and Meaning.” Oregon Law Review 45 (1966): 288–314.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, Brian R. “The Argument from Definition Revisited: Race and Definition in the Progressive Era.” Argumentation and Advocacy 35.4 (Spring 1999): 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, Matt . “Snowmobile Restrictions in Denali Park.” February 1999 <http://www.off-road.com/snowmobile/landuse/denali/denalinov98/denalifeb99.html>. Accessed August 23, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, M. Linda . “Public Argument and Legislative Debate in the Rhetorical Construction of Public Policy: The Case of Florida Midwifery Legislation.” Quarterly Journal Speech 85.4 (November 1999): 361–379.
   Google Scholar
• Mumby, Dennis . “The Problem of Hegemony: Rereading Gramsci for Organizational Studies.” Western Journal of Communication 61.4 (Fall 1997): 343–375.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, Roderick . Wilderness and the American Mind. New Haven: Yale UP, 1967.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. “Portion of Denali NP Temporarily Closed to Snowmachines; Popular Riding Areas Remain Open.” February 1999 <http://www.nps.gov/dena/prsnow.htm>. Accessed August 28, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• National Park Service. “Snowmachine Proposal extends Riding Prohibition in Wilderness Core of Denali National Park.” November 1998. <http://www.nps.gov/dena/snowmach.htm>. Accessed August 23, 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlager, Max . The Idea of Wilderness: From Prehistory to the Age of Ecology. New Haven: Yale UP, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, Tarla Rai. “The Rhetorical Construction of Institutional Authority in a Senate Subcommittee Hearing on Wilderness Legislation.” Western Journal of Speech Communication , 52 (Fall 1988): 259–276.
   Google Scholar
• “Politics, Not Science.” Idaho Falls Post Register August 17, 2001 <http://www.greateryellowstone.org/winter_access_edIdaho.html>. Accessed October 18, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Proescholdt, Kevin . After the Shouting Stopped: Implementation of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness Act. Minnesota Audubon Council, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Rabkin, Jeremy . Judicial Compulsions. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlf, Daniel , and Douglas L. Honnold . “Managing the Balances of Nature: The Legal Framework of Wilderness Management.” Ecology Law Quarterly 15 (1988): 249–279.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, Edward . “Toward a Pragmatic Approach to Definition: ‘Wetlands’ and the Politics of Meaning.” In Environmental Pragmatism , Eds. Andrew Light and Eric Katz . New York: Routledge, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, Edward . “Analyzing Argumentative Discourse from a Rhetorical Perspective: Defining ‘Person’ and ‘Human Life’ in Constitutional Disputes over Abortion.” Argumentation 14 (2000): 315–332.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarze, Steve . “Public Participation and (Failed) Legitimation: The Case of Forest Service Rhetorics in the Boundary Waters.” Proceedings of the 6^th Biennial Conference on Communication and Environment. Eds. Marie-France Aepli , John W. Delicath , and Stephen P. Depoe . Cincinnati: Center for Environmental Communication Studies, 2001: 191–200.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, Martin . Who Guards the Guardians? Athens: U of Georgia Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Titsworth, B. Scott . “An Ideological Basis for Definition in Public Argument: A Case Study of the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act.” Argumentation and Advocacy 35.4 (Spring 1999): 171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, Douglas . “Persuasive Definitions and Public Policy Arguments.” Argumentation and Advocacy 37.3 (Winter 2001): 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Wilderness Act. Pub. L. 88–577. Sept. 3, 1964.
   Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, Julia M. Public Lands Conflict and Resolution: Managing National Forest Disputes. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, Mark . “Federal Wilderness Preservation in the United States: The Preservation of Wilderness?” The Great New Wilderness Debate. Ed. J. Baird Callicott and Robert Nelson . Athens, GA: U of Georgia Press, 1998. 131–153.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, David . “Definitions.” Argument in a Time of Change: Definitions, Frameworks, and Critiques. Ed. James F. Klumpp . Annandale, VA: National Communication Association, 1997.
   Google Scholar