43
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
REVIEW ESSAY

Analogues to Argument: New Media and Literacy in a Posthuman Era

Pages 262-270 | Published online: 02 Feb 2017

References

  • Apple, A. L. , & Messner, B. A. (2001). Paranoia and paradox: The apocalyptic rhetoric of Christian identity. Western Journal of Communication , 65, 206–227.
  • Barbatsis, G. S. (1996). “Look, and I will show you something you will want to see”: Pictorial engagement in negative political campaign commercials. Argumentation and Advocacy , 33, 69–80.
  • Birdsell, D. S. , & Groarke, L. (1996). Toward a theory of visual argument. Argumentation and Advocacy , 33, 1–10.
  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1979). What computers can't do: The limits of artificial intelligence. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Fisher, W. R. (1987). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
  • Flanagin, A. J. , Farinola, W. J. M. , & Metzer, M. J. (2000). The technical code of the Internet/World Wide Web. Critical Studies in Media Communication , 17, 409–428.
  • Gurak, L. J. (1997). Persuasion and privacy in cyberspace: The online protests over Lotus Marketplace and the clipper chip. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Gurak, L. J. (2001). Cyberliteracy: Navigating the Internet with awareness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Inch, E. S. , & Warnick, B. (2002). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Joy, B. (2000, April). Why the future doesn't need us. Wired , 8.04, 238–245, 248–263.
  • Kaplan, N. (2000). Literacy beyond books. In A. Herman & T. Swiss (Eds.), The World Wide Web and contemporary cultural theory (pp. 207–234). New York: Routledge.
  • Kennedy, G. (1980). Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modem times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Kurzweil, R. (1999). The age of spiritual machines: When computers exceed human intelligence. New York: Viking.
  • Lake, R. A. , & Pickering, B. A. (1998). Argumentation, the visual, and the possibility of refutation: An exploration. Argumentation , 12, 79–83.
  • McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Mitchell, W. J. T. (1992). The reconfigured eye: Visual truth in the post-photographic era. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Mitra, A. (1999). Characteristics of the WWW text: Tracing discursive strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 5 [URL: http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol5/issue1/mitra.html] (Aug. 18, 2000).
  • Mitra, A. , & Cohen, E. (1999). Analyzing the Web: Directions and challenges. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 179–202). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Perelman, C. , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation ( J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver , Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
  • Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative , Vol. I ( K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer , Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1983.)
  • Rochlin, G. I. (1997). Trapped in the net: The unanticipated consequences of computerization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Shelley, C. (1996). Rhetorical and demonstrative modes of visual argument: Looking at images of human evolution. Argumentation and Advocacy , 33, 53–68.
  • Stroud, S. R. (2001). Technology and mythic narrative: The Matrix as technological hero-quest. Western Journal of Communication , 65, 416–441.
  • Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the Screen: Identity in the age of the Internet New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Warnick, B. (2002). Critical literacy in a digital era: Technology, rhetoric, and the public interest Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wenzel, J. (1990). Three perspectives on argument. In R. Trapp & J. Schuetz (Eds.), Perspectives on argumentation (pp. 9–26). Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.