The Role of Public Opinion in Policy Argument: An Examination of Public Opinion Rhetoric in the Federal Budget Process

References

• Aristotle. (1982). The “art” of rhetoric ( J. H. Freese . Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R. (1999). Toward a normative conception of difference in public deliberation. Argumentation and Advocacy , 35, 115–129.
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R. (2003). The multiple Mr. Dewey: Multiple publics and permeable borders in John Dewey's theory of the public sphere. Argumentation and Advocacy , 39, 174–188.
   Google Scholar
• Asher, H. (1995). Polling and the public: What every citizen should know (3rd ed.). Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryce, J. (1927). The American commonwealth (Vol. 1). New York: MacMillan. (Original work published 1898)
   Google Scholar
• Burke, K. (1968). Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature and method. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly , 56, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Button, M. , & Mattson, K. (1999). Deliberative democracy in practice: Challenges and prospects for civic deliberation. Polity , 31, 609–637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science , 6, 307–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, W.J. (1998, February 9). Remarks on submitting the 1999 federal budget. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents , 34, 178–180.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W. J. (1999a, February 22). Remarks on legislative priorities for the budget surplus. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents , 35, 233–238.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, W.J. (1999b, March 1). Remarks to the community in Tucson, Arizona. Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents , 35, 302–309.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, F. L. , Barabas, J. , & Page, B. I. (2002a). Invoking public opinion: Polls, policy debates, and the future of Social Security. Public Opinion Quarterly , 66, 235–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, F. L , Barabas, J. , & Page, B. I. (2002b). Policy elites invoke public opinion: Polls, policy debates, and the future of Social Security. In J. Manza , F. L. Cook , & B. I. Page (Eds.), Navigating public opinion: Polk, policy, and the future of American democracy (pp. 141–170). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Concurrent resolution on the budget—fiscal year 2001. (2000, March 23). Congressional Record , 146, H1330–H1402.
   Google Scholar
• Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 1999. (1998, June 4). Congressional Record , 144, H4144–H4163.
   Google Scholar
• Concurrent resolution on the budget for fiscal year 2000. (1999, March 24). Congressional Record , 145, S3162–S3180.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional budget for the United States government for fiscal years 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, and 2003. (1998, April 1). Congressional Record , 144, S2879–S2964.
   Google Scholar
• Congressional budget for the United States government for fiscal years 2001 through 2005. (2000, April 4). Congressional Record , 146, S2053–S2066.
   Google Scholar
• Conover, P. J. , Searing, D. D. , & Crewe, I. M. (2002). The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science , 32, 21–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter (Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206–261). New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eliasoph, N. (1998). Avoiding politics: How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferree, M. M. , Gamson, W. A. , Gerhards, J. , & Rucht, D. (2002). Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society , 31, 289–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glynn, C.J. , Herbst, S. , O'Keefe, G. J. , & Shapiro, R. Y. (1999). Public opinion. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. T. (1990). The rhetorical tradition, modern communication, and the grounds of justified assent. In D. C. Williams & M. D. Hazen (Eds.), Argumentation theory and the rhetoric of assent (pp. 173–195). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society ( T. Burger & F. Lawrence , Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original work published 1962)
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. L. , & Marcus, G. E. (1993). Introduction: The practice of democratic theory. In G. E. Marcus & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Reconsidering the demoaatic public (pp. 1–32). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (1993). Numbered voices: How opinion polling has shaped American politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (1998). Reading public opinion: How political actors view the democratic process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herbst, S. (2001). Public opinion infrastructures: Meanings, measures, media. Political Communication , 18, 451–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1985). Public opinion and American foreign policy: The case of illusory support for the Panama Canal Treaties. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 71, 302–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1986). The Panama Canal in American politics: Domestic advocacy and the evolution of policy. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1994). The nuclear freeze campaign: Rhetoric and foreign policy in the telepolitical age. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1997). George Gallup and the rhetoric of scientific democracy. Communication Monographs , 64, 161–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (2000). The “science” of Cold War strategy: Propaganda and public opinion in the Eisenhower Administration's “war of words.” In M.J. Medhurst & H. W. Brands (Eds.), Critical reflections on the Cold War: Rhetoric and history (pp. 134–168). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. , & Dorsey, L. (1991). Public opinion and the nuclear freeze: The rhetoric of popular sovereignty in foreign policy debate. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 55, 319–338.
   Google Scholar
• In the committee of the whole. (1999, March 25). Congressional Record , 145, H1710–H1780.
   Google Scholar
• Ippolito, D. S. (2003). Why budgets matter: Budget policy and American politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R. , Lawrence, E. D. , Shapiro, R. Y. , & Smith, S. S. (1998). Congressional leadership of public opinion. Political Science Quarterly , 113, 21–41.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R. , & Shapiro, R. Y. (1994). Issues, candidate image, and priming: The use of private polls in Kennedy's 1960 presidential campaign. American Political Science Review , 88, 527–540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R. , & Shapiro, R. Y. (1995). The rise of presidential polling: The Nixon white house in historical perspective. Public Opinion Quarterly , 59, 163–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, G. A. (1980). Classical rhetoric and its Christian and secular tradition from ancient to modern times. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kettl, D. F. (2003). Deficit politics: The search for balance in American politics (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1993). Politicians, self-interest, and ideas. In G. E. Marcus & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public (pp. 73–89). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B. (1992). Effective public opinion. In J. D. Kennamer (Ed.), Public opinion, the press and public policy (pp. 41–62). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur, D. G. (1996). Building the national debt: The persuasive system behind economic policy in the 1980s. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Levasseur, D. G. (2000). Rhetorical construction of economic policy: Political judgment and the 1995 budget debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 3, 183–209.
   Google Scholar
• Lipari, L. (1999). Polling as ritual. Journal of Communication , 49, 83–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippmann, W. (1925). The phantom public. New York: Harcourt Brace.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J. (1983). Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, M. C. (1975). In search of “the people”: A rhetorical alternative. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 61, 235–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGee, M. C. (1978). “Not men, but measures”: The origins and import of an ideological principle. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 64, 41–54.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, M. C. (1998). Rhetoric in postmodern America: Conversations with Michael Calvin McGee ( C. Corbin , Ed.). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelberg, T. , & Oleske, J. (2000). Race and public deliberation. Political Communication , 17, 169–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mill, J. S. (1975). John Stuart Mill on liberty: Annotated text sources and background criticism ( D. Spitz , Ed.). New York: W. W. Norton. (Original work published 1859)
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. R. , Just, M. R. , & Crigler, A. R. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Noelle-Neumann, E. , & Petersen, T. (2004). The spiral of silence and the social nature of man. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 339–356). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. M. (1991). Constraining open deliberation in times of war: Presidential war justifications for Grenada and the Persian Gulf. Argumentation and Advocacy , 28, 64–79.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, K. M. , & Goodnight, G. T. (1994). Entanglements of consumption, cruelty, privacy, and fashion: The social controversy over fur. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 80, 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, K. M. , & Goodnight, G. T. (2004). Ingenium-speaking in community: The case of the Prince William County zoning hearings on Disney's America. In P. A. Sullivan & S. R. Goldzwig (Eds.), New approaches to rhetoric (pp. 31–59). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paden, C. , & Page, B. I. (2003). Congress invokes public opinion on welfare reform. American Politics Research , 31, 670–679.
   Google Scholar
• Page, B. I. , & Shapiro, R. Y. (1993). The rational public and democracy. In G. E. Marcus & R. L. Hanson (Eds.), Reconsidering the democratic public (pp. 35–64). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powlick, P. J. , & Katz, A. Z. (1998). Defining the American public opinion/foreign policy nexus. International Studies Quarterly , 42, 29–62.
   Google Scholar
• The President's budget for fiscal year 2001: Hearing before the committee on the budget, House of Representatives , 106th Cong., 2nd Sess. (2000).
   Google Scholar
• The President's budget submission for fiscal year 2000: Hearing before the committee on the budget, House of Representatives , 106th Cong., 1st Sess. (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Ryfe, D. M. (2002). The practice of deliberative democracy: A study of 16 deliberative organizations. Political Communication , 19, 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schick, A. (1995). The federal budget: Politics, policy, process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Shuman, H. E. (1984). Politics and the budget: The struggle between the President and the Congress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Splichal, S. (1999). Public opinion: Developments and controversies in the twentieth century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Vatz, R. E. (1976). Public opinion and presidential ethos. Western Speech Communication , 40, 196–206.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. (1996). Liberalism and the problem of knowledge: A new rhetoric for modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. , & Edy, J. A. (1999). Basic beliefs, democratic theory, and public opinion. In C. J. Glynn , S. Herbst , G.J. O'Keefe , & R. Y. Shapiro (Eds.), Public opinion (pp. 212–245). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, D. (1994). The postmodern public: Revitalizing commitment to the public forum. Vital Speeches of the Day , 60(10), 1–11.
   Google Scholar