Deductivism as an Interpretive Strategy: A Reply to Groarke's Recent Defense of Reconstructive Deductivism

References

• Allen, D. (1990). Govier's problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Informal Logic , 12, 43–61.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, J. (1987). Interpreting arguments. Informal Logic , 9, 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Bowles, G. (1994). The deductive/inductive distinction. Informal Logic , 16, 159–184.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. (1895). What the tortoise said to Achilles. Mind , 4, 278–280.
   Google Scholar
• Copi, I. M. (1982). Introduction to logic (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eemeren, F. H. van & Grootendorst, R. (1992). Argumentation, communication and fallacies. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Fohr, S. D. (1980a). The deductive-inductive distinction. Informal Logic Newsletter , 2(2), 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Fohr, S. D. (1980b). Deductive-inductive: Reply to criticisms. Informal Logic Newsletter , 3(1), 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (1999). Deductivism surpassed. Australasian Journal of Philosophy , 77, 447–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerritsen, S. (1994). A defense of deductivism in reconstructing unexpressed premises. In F. H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Studies in pragma-dialectics (pp. 41–47). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (1995). Arguments and arguers. Teaching Philosophy , 18, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. (1997). Coalescent argumentation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Godden, D. M. (1998). Commentary on José Plug: Indicators of obiter dicta. In H. V. Hansen , C. W. Tindale , & A. V. Colman (Eds.), Proceedings of the second OSSA conference: Argumentation and rhetoric. St. Catherines, ON: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1980a). More on deductive and inductive arguments. Informal Logic Newsletter , 2(3), 7–8.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1980b). Addressing arguments: What range of standards? Informal Logic Newsletter , 3(1), 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1987). Problems in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Govier, T. (1992). What is a good argument? Metaphilosophy , 23, 393–409.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (1992). In defense of deductivism: Replying to Govier. In F. H. van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst , J. A. Blair , & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation illuminated (pp. 113–121). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (1995). What pragma-dialectics can learn from deductivism, and what deductivism can learn from pragma-dialectics. In F. H. van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst , J. A. Blair , & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Proceedings of the third ISSA conference on argumentation: Vol. 2. Analysis and evaluation (pp. 138–145). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (1999). Deductivism within pragma-dialectics. Argumentation , 13, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Groarke, L. (2002). Johnson on the metaphysics of argument. Argumentation , 16, 277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, D. (1980). Deductive and inductive: Types of validity, not types of argument. Informal Logic Newsletter , 2(3), 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, D. (2003). Toulmin's warrants. In F. H. van Eemeren , J. A. Blair , C. A. Willard , & A. F. S. Henkemans (Eds.), Anyone who has a view: Theoretical contributions to the study of argumentation (pp. 69–82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, F. (1980). Deductively-inductively. Informal Logic Newsletter , 3(1), 4–5.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. H. (2000). Manifest rationality: A pragmatic theory of argument. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Middletown, CN: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1970). Conjunctivitis. In M. Swain (Ed.), Induction, acceptance arid rational belief (pp. 55–82). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Machina, K. F. (1985). Induction and deduction revisited. Nous , 19, 571–578.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and object Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skyrms, B. (1986). Choice and chance: An introduction to inductive logic (3rd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Stove, D. (1970). Deductivism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy , 48, 76–98.
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vorobej, M. (1992). Defining deduction. Informal Logic , 14, 105–118.
   Google Scholar
• Weddle, P. (1979). Inductive, deductive. Informal Logic Newsletter , 2(1), 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Weddle, P. (1980). Good grief! More on induction/deduction. Informal Logic Newsletter , 3(1), 10–12.
   Google Scholar