Family Communication Patterns and Competitor Satisfaction: A National Survey of Collegiate Forensics Participants

References

• Chaffee, S. H. , McLeod, J. M. , & Atkin, C. K. (1971). Parental influences on adolescent media use. American Behavioral Scientist , 14, 323–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernin, M. , & Goldsmith, R. (1986). Family day: An event to improve student retention. Journal of College Student Personnel , 27, 364–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilstrap, C. A. , & Gilstrap, C. A. (2003). Managing emotions in forensics and family: A family dialogue about emotion labor and emotion work. The Forensic , 88, 3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gould, D. , Guinan, D. , Greenleaf, C. , Medbery, R. , & Peterson, K. (1999). Factors affecting Olympic performance: Perceptions of athletes and coaches from more and less successful teams. Sport Psychologist , 73, 371–394.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, E. (1994). Interpersonal communication satisfaction inventory. In R. B. Rubin , P. Palmgreen , & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research methods: A sourcebook (pp. 217–222). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granskog, J. (1992). Tri-ing together: An exploratory analysis of the social networks of female and male triathletes. Play & Culture , 5, 76–91.
   Google Scholar
• Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research , 4, 253–264.
   Google Scholar
• Hobbs, J. , Hobbs, J. , Veuleman, A. , & Redding, C. (2003). “The will to power:” Forensics as a sometimes- dysfunctional family. The Forensic , 88, 17–28.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. F. (1998). The relationship between family characteristics and communication apprehension. Communication Research Reports , 15, 91–98.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. (2003). Forensics and family: An introduction. The Forensic , 88, 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, S. , & Jensen, G. L. (2004, November). The contemporary face of forensics and family: A survey analysis of the relationship between forensic education, participation, and family status. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Kantor, D. , & Lehr, W. (1975). Inside the family. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mallinckrodt, B. (1988). Student retention, social support, and dropout intention: Comparison of black and white students. Journal of College Student Development , 29, 60–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. M. , Atkin, C. K. , & Chaffee, S. H. (1972). Adolescents, parents, and television use: Self-report and other-report measures from the Wisconsin sample. In G. A. Comstock & E. A. Rubinstein (Eds.), Television and social behavior: Vol. 3. Television and adolescent aggression (DHEW Publication NO, HSM 72–9058) (pp. 239–313). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, L. D. (1991). Family communication patterns: An epistemic analysis and conceptual reiteration. Communication Research , 18, 548–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, M. (1991). Long-term norms and cognitive structures as shapers of television viewer activity Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media , 35, 319–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, F. (1993). Conceptualization of normal family processes. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal Family Processes (2nd ed., pp. 3–69). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wambolt, F. , & Reiss, D. (1989). Defining family heritage and a new relationship identity: Two central tasks in the making of marriage. Family Process , 2, 317–335.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. E. , McGee, B. , & Worth, D. S. (2001). University student perceptions of the efficacy of debate participation: An empirical investigation. Argumentation and Advocacy , 37, 198–209.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, D. E. , & Hughes, P. C. (2003). The forensics family: A call for research. The Forensic , 88, 29–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin, S. J. , & Bennett, L. A. (1984). Family rituals. Family Process , 23, 401–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar