322
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
THE FORUM

Risk, Controversy, and Rhetoric: Response to Goodnight

Pages 34-37 | Published online: 02 Feb 2017

Works Cited

  • Brante, Thomas . “Reasons for Studying Scientific and Science-Based Controversies.” Controversial Science: From Content to Contention. Ed. Thomas Brante , Steve Fuller and William Lynch . Albany: State U of New York P, 1993. 177–91.
  • Burke, Kenneth . A Rhetoric of Motives. 1950. Berkeley: U of California P, 1969.
  • Fuller, Steve . “A Strategy for Making Science Studies Policy Relevant.” Controversial Science: From Content to Contention. Ed. Thomas Brante , Steve Fuller and William Lynch . Albany: State U of New York P, 1993. 107–25.
  • Goodnight, G. Thomas . “The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument: A Speculative Inquiry into the Art of Public Deliberation.” Journal of the American Forensic Association 18 (1982): 214–27.
  • Goodnight, G. Thomas . “Politics: The Personal, Technical, and Public Spheres of Argument.” Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Ed. Thomas O. Sloane . New York: Oxford UP, 2001. 629–31.
  • Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science. 2nd ed. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1970.
  • Machamer, Peter , Marcello Pera , and Aristides Baltas . “Introduction.” Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Ed. Peter Machamer , Marcello Pera and Aristides Baltas . New York: Oxford UP, 2000. 3–17.
  • Miller, Carolyn R. “Novelty and Heresy in the Debate on Nonthermal Effects of Electromagnetic Fields.” Rhetoric and Incommensurability. Ed. Randy Allen Harris . West Lafayette, IN: Parlor, forthcoming.
  • Miller, Carolyn R. “The Presumptions of Expertise: The Role of Ethos in Risk Analysis.” Configurations 11 (2003): 163–202.
  • Pera, Marcello . “Rhetoric and Scientific Controversies.” Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives. Ed. Peter Machamer , Marcello Pera and Aristides Baltas . New York: Oxford UP, 2000. 50–66.
  • Popper, Karl R. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic, 1962.
  • Sloane, Thomas O. On the Contrary: The Protocol of Traditional Rhetoric. Washington, DC: Catholic UP, 1997.
  • Waddell, Craig . “The Role of Pathos in the Decision-Making Process: A Study in the Rhetoric of Science Policy.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 76 (1990): 381–400.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.