Chisholm V. Georgia and the Question of the Judiciary in the Early Republic

References

• Ackerman, B. A. (1985). Beyond Carolene Products. Harvard Law Review , 98, 713–746.
   Google Scholar
• Amar, A. R. (2005). America's constitution: A biography. New York: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Aune, J. A. (1999). Three justices in search of historical truth: Romance and tragedy in the rhetoric of establishment clause jurisprudence. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 2, 573–597.
   Google Scholar
• Baiter, S. J. (2001). The search for grounds in legal argumentation: A rhetorical analysis of Texas vs Johnson. Argumentation , 15, 381–395.
   Google Scholar
• Blair, J. (1793). Opinion of the court. Chisholm v. Georgia , 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, P. (1982). Constitutional fate: Theory of the Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bobbitt, P. (1991). Constitutional interpretation. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Casto, W. R. (1995). The Supreme Court in the early republic: The chief justiceships of John Jay and Oliver Ellsworth. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press. Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Conway, G. (2003). Inevitable reconstructions: Voice and ideology in two landmark U. S. Supreme Court opinions. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 6, 487–508.
   Google Scholar
• Cushing, W. (1793). Opinion of the court. Chisholm v. Georgia , 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Doxtader, E. (1995). Learning public deliberation through the critique of institutional argument. Argumentation and Advocacy , 31, 185–203.
   Google Scholar
• Doxtader, E. (2001). Making rhetorical history in a time of transition: The occasion, constitution, and representation of South African reconciliation. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 4, 223–260.
   Google Scholar
• Feteris, E. T. (1997). A survey of 25 years of research on legal argumentation. Argumentation , 11, 355–376.
   Google Scholar
• Field, M. A. (1978). The Eleventh Amendment and other sovereign immunity doctrines: Part one. University of Pennsylvania Law Review , 126, 515–549.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, W. A. (1983). A historical interpretation of the Eleventh Amendment: A narrow construction of an affirmative grant of jurisdiction rather than a prohibition against jurisdiction. Stanford Law Review , 35, 1033–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman, F. (2004). The famous footnote four: A history of the Carolene Products footnote. South Texas Law Review , 46, 163–243.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A. , Madison, J. , & Jay, J. (1961). The federalist papers ( C. Rossiter , Ed.). New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Hasian, M., Jr. (1998). The domestication of legal argumentation: A case study of the formalism of the legal realists. Communication Quarterly , 46, 430–445.
   Google Scholar
• Hasian, M., Jr. , & Croasmun, E. (1992). The legitimizing function of judicial rhetoric in the eugenics controversy. Argumentation and Advocacy , 28, 123–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Iredell, J. (1793). Opinion of the court. Chisholm v. Georgia , 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. E. (1972). The Eleventh Amendment and sovereign immunity. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jay, J. (1793). Opinion of the court. Chisholm v. Georgia , 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, W. (1994). Of innocence, exclusion, and the burning of flags: The romantic realism of the law. Southern Communication Journal , 60, 4–21.
   Google Scholar
• Linzer, P. (1995). The Carolene Products footnote and the preferred position of individual rights: Louis Lusky and John
   Google Scholar
• Hart Ely vs. Harlan Fiske Stone . Constitutional Commentary , 12, 277–303.
   Google Scholar
• Lusky, L. (1982). Footnote redux: A Carotene Products reminiscence. Columbia Law Review , 82, 1093–1106.
   Google Scholar
• Marcus, M. (1994). The documentary history of the Supreme Court of the United States , 1789–1800 (Vol. 5). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, L. C. (1989). Fighting the words of the Eleventh Amendment. Harvard Law Review , 102, 1342–1371.
   Google Scholar
• Mathewson, G. C. (1998). Outdoing Lewis Carrol: Judicial rhetoric and acceptable fictions. Argumentation , 12, 233–244.
   Google Scholar
• Mathis, D. (1967). Chisholm v. Georgia: Background and settlement. The Journal of American History , 54, 19–29.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, T. S. (1999). Common sense deliberative practice: John Witherspoon, James Madison, and the U.S. Constitution. Rhetoric Society Quarterly , 29, 25–47.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, T. S. (2000). Representation and political deliberation in the Massachusetts constitutional ratification debate. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 3, 529–553.
   Google Scholar
• Nutting, K. (2002). Legal practices and the reason of the law. Argumentation , 16, 109–131.
   Google Scholar
• Orth, J. V. (1987). The judicial power of the United States: The Eleventh Amendment in American history. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation ( J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver , Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958)
   Google Scholar
• Pfander, J. E. (1998). History and state suability: An ‘explanatory’ account for the Eleventh Amendment. Cornell Law Review , 83, 1269–1382.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pole, J. R. (1966). Political representation in England and the origins of the American republic. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, L. F., Jr. (1982). Carotene Products revisited. Columbia Law Review , 82, 1087–1092.
   Google Scholar
• Rakove, J. N. (1996). Original meanings: Politics and ideas in the making of the Constitution. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rieke, R. D. (1991). The judicial dialogue. Argumentation , 5, 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Rountree, C. (2001). Instantiating “the law” and its dissents in Korematsu v. United States: A dramatistic analysis of judicial discourse. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 87, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E. (2001). What is golf?: Pragmatic essentializing and definitional argument in PGA Tour, Inc. v. Martin. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarze, S. (2002). Rhetorical traction: Definitions and institutional arguments in judicial opinions about wilderness access. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 131–150.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, H. (1938). Opinion of the court. United States v. Carotene Products Co. , 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
   Google Scholar
• United States v. Carolene Products Co., 304 U.S. 144 (1938).
   Google Scholar
• White, J. B. (1987). Rhetoric and law: The arts of cultural and communal life. In J. S. Nelson , A. Megill , & D. N. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences: Language and argument in scholarship and public affairs (pp. 298–318). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wiethoff, W. E. (1985). Critical perspectives on Perelman's philosophy of legal argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 22, 88–95.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, J. (1793). Opinion of the court. Chisholm v. Georgia , 2 U.S. 419 (1793).
   Google Scholar
• Wood, G. S. (1998). The creation of the American republic , 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar