A Functional Analysis of Televised U.S. Senate and Gubernatorial Campaign Debates

References

• Airne, D. , & Benoit, W. L. (2005). 2004 Illinois U.S. Senate debates: Keyes versus Obama. American Behavioral Scientist , 49, 343–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auer, J. J. (1962). The counterfeit debates. In S. Kraus (Ed.), The great debates: Background, perspective, effects (pp. 142–150). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Banwart, M. C. , & McKinney, M. S. (2005). A gendered influence in campaign debates? Analysis of mixed-gender United States senate and gubernatorial debates. Communication Studies , 56, 353–373.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L. (2000). Campaign quality: Standards for evaluation, benchmarks for reform. In L. Bartels & L. Vavreck (Eds.), Campaign reform: Insights and evidence (pp. 1–61). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2000). A functional analysis of political advertising across media, 1998. Communication Studies , 51, 274–295.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2003). Presidential campaign discourse as a causal factor in election outcome. Western Journal of Communication , 67, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2004). Political party affiliation and presidential campaign discourse. Communication Quarterly , 52, 81–97.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Davis, C. (2007). Newspaper coverage of U.S. senate debates. Speaker & Gavel , 44, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Hansen, G.J. (2001). Presidential debate questions and the public agenda. Communication Quarterly , 49, 130–141.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Hansen, G. J. , & Verser, R. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 70, 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , Brazeal, L. , McHale, J. P. , Klyukovski, A. , & Airne, D. (2002). The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Wells, W. T. (1996). Candidates in conflict: Persuasive attack and defense in the 1992 presidential debates. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, G. F. , Meadow, R. G. , & Jackson-Beeck, M. (Eds.). (1980). The presidential debates: Media, electoral, and policy perspectives. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bitzer, L. , & Rueter, T. (1980). Carter versus Ford: The counterfeit debates of 1976. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boster, F.J. (2002). On making progress in communication science. Human Communication Research , 28, 473–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasher, H. (2003). Capitalizing on contention: Issue agendas in U.S. Senate campaigns. Political Communication , 20, 453–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazeal, L. M. , & Benoit, W. L. (2001). A functional analysis of congressional television spots, 1986–2000. Communication Quarterly , 49, 436–454.
   Google Scholar
• Bystrom, D. , Roper, C. , Gobetz, R. , Massey, T. , & Beall, C. (1991). The effects of a televised gubernatorial debate. Political Communication Review , 16, 57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B. , & McKinney, M. S. (Eds.). (1994). The 1992 presidential debates in focus. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Conrad, C. (1993). Political debates as televisual form. Argumentation and Advocacy , 30, 62–76.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. P. , McLeod, D. M. , & Nathanson, A. I. (1994). Reporters vs. undecided voters: An analysis of the questions asked during the 1992 presidential debates. Communication Quarterly , 42, 390–406.
   Google Scholar
• Farnsworth, S. J. , & Lichter, S. R. (2003). The nightly news nightmare: Network television's coverage of U.S. presidential elections, 1988–2000. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.). (1994). Rhetorical studies of national political debates , 1960–1992 (2nd ed.). New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Friedenberg, R. V. (Ed.). (1997). Rhetorical studies of national political debates-1996. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D. A. (1989). Mass media and American politics (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, K. L. , Zakahi, W. R. , Glles, M. J. , & McQuitty, S. (2000). Components of candidate images: Statistical analysis of the issue-persona dichotomy in the presidential campaign. Communication Monographs , 66, 227–238.
   Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , Pfau, M. , & Brydon, S. R. (1992). Televised presidential debates: Advocacy in contemporary America. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Herrnson, P. S. (1998). Congressional elections: Campaigning at home and in Washington. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinck, E. A. (1993). Enacting the presidency: political argument, presidential debates, and presidential character. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. (1969. Content analysis in communication research. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hullett, C. R. , & Louden, A. D. (1998). Audience recall of issues and image in congressional debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 34, 189–202.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, G. C. (2001). The politics of congressional elections (5th ed.). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Just, M. , Crigler, A. , & Wallach, L. (1990). Thirty seconds or thirty minutes: What viewers leam from spot advertisements and candidate debates Journal of Communication , 40, 120–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn, K. F. , & Kenney, P. J. (1999). The spectacle of U.S. Senate campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H. , & Birdsell, D. S. (1988). Presidential debates: The challenge of creating an informed electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. A. (1996). Intertextuality in political debates: What do we need to know to understand them? Accessed 3//9/07: http://www.sil.org/~radneyr/humanities/linguist/intertxt.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (Ed.). (1979). The great debates: Carter versus Ford 1976. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, S. (2000). Televised presidential debates and public policy (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoue, D. J. , & Schrott, P. R. (1991). The joint press conference: The history, impact, and prospects of American presidential debates. New York: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, A. (1982). Differences in impact between local and national televised political candidates' debates. Western Journal of Speech Communication , 46, 291–298.
   Google Scholar
• Mannion, J. (2006, November 10). Rumsfeld exits as Bush gets thumped: USA DECIDES 2006. USA Today , p. 12.
   Google Scholar
• Martel, M. (1983). Political campaign debates: Issues, strategies, and tactics. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S. , & Carlin, D. B. (2004). Political campaign debates. In L. L. Kaid (Ed.), Handbook of political communication research (pp. 203–234). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. (1984). Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising , 13, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota Public Radio. (2002, November 4). Coleman, Mondale debate on eve of election. Accessed 3/9/07: http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/200211/04_zdechlikm_sendebate/
   Google Scholar
• Ornstein, N. (1987). Nonpresidential debates in America. In J. L. Swerdlow (Ed.), Presidential debates 1988 and beyond (pp. 52–61). Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Petrocik, J. R. (1991). Divided government: Is it all in the campaigns? In G. W. Cox & S. Kernell (Eds.), The politics of divided government (pp. 13–38). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1983). Criteria and format to optimize political debates: An analysis of South Dakota's election '80 series. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 19, 205–214.
   Google Scholar
• Philport, J. C. , & Balon, R. E. (1975). Candidate image in a broadcast debate. Journal of Broadcasting , 19, 181–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Racine Group . (2002). White paper on televised political campaign debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 199–218.
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, T. (2005). A perfect storm: A case study analysis of the defeat of Tom Dashle by John Thune in the 2004 South Dakota Senate race. American Behavioral Scientist , 49, 326–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, M. J. , & Sheehan, M. A. (1983). Over the wire and on tv: CBS and UPI in campaign '80. New York: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, A. (2000). Presidential debates: Forty years of high-risk TV. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stempel, G. H. (1994). Print media campaign coverage. In G. H. Stempel (Ed.), The practice of political communication (pp. 40–49). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C. J. (1975). Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal , 26, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Swerdlow, J. L. (Ed.). (1987). Presidential debates 1988 and beyond. Washington, D. C.: Congressional Quarterly.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. D. , & Trent, J. S. (1995). The incumbent and his challengers: The problem of adapting to prevailing conditions. In K. E. Kendall (Ed.), Presidential campaign discourse: Strategic communication problems (pp. 69–92). Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Trent, J. S. , & Friedenberg, R. V. (2008). Political campaign communication: Principles and practices (6th ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, D. (1992). Spectator politics and the revival of public argument. Communication Monographs , 59, 411–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar