Advanced search
Publication Cover
Argumentation and Advocacy Volume 47, 2010 - Issue 2: Special Issue on Public Argument/Digital Media
Submit an article Journal homepage
190
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Democracy Through the Polarized Lens of the Camcorder: Argumentation and Vernacular Spectacle on Youtube in the 2008 Election

Aaron Hess Aaron Hess, PhD (2008, Arizona State University), Department of Communication, Indiana University-Purdue University, Fort Wayne. An earlier version of this essay was presented at the 94th annual convention of the National Communication Association in 2009. The author would like to thank Damien Pfister and the two anonymous reviewers for their excellent suggestions for this manuscript.Correspondence[email protected]
Pages 106-122 | Published online: 02 Feb 2017

References

  • Banwart, M. C. (2006). Webstyles in 2004: The gendering of candidates on campaign web sites? In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 37–56). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Barber, B. (2003). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. . Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Bennett, W. L. (1992). White noise: The perils of mass mediated democracy. Communication Monographs , 59, 401–406.
  • Brouwer, D. , & Hess, A. (2007). Making sense of ‘God Hates Fags’ and ‘Thank God for 9/11’: A thematic analysis of Milbloggers' responses to Reverend Fred Phelps and the Westboro Baptist Church. Western Journal of Communication , 77, 69–90.
  • Bruns, A. (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and beyond. . New York: Peter Lang.
  • Burgess, J. , & Green, J. (2009). YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. . Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
  • Company history (2009). YouTube, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.eom/t/about
  • Debord, G. (1994). The society of the spectacle. ( D. Nicholson-Smith , Trans.). New York: Zone Books. (Original work published 1967).
  • Delicath, J. W. , & DeLuca, K. M. (2003). Image events, the public sphere, and argumentative practice: The case of radical environmental groups. Argumentation , 77, 315–333.
  • DeLuca, K. M. (1999). Image politics: The new rhetoric of environmental activism. . New York: Guilford Press.
  • DeLuca, K. M. , & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen: Democracy, activism, and the “violence” of Seattle. Critical Studies in Media Communication , 19, 125–151.
  • Dijck, J. van (2009). Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture & Society , 31, 41–58.
  • Farhi, P. (2008/2009, December/January). Off the bus. American Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4644
  • Foot, K. A. , & Schneider, S. M. (2006). Web campaigning. . Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Fusco, C. , & Pallasch, A. M. (2008). Who is Bill Ayers? Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved from http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/obama/902213,CST-NWS-ayers18.article
  • Goodnight, G. T. (1999). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. In J. L. Lucaites , C. M. Condit , & S. Caudill (Eds.), Contemporary rhetorical theory: A reader (pp. 251–264). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Graham, J. (2008, October 24). YouTube expands its horizons, and its time limits for videos; Site branches out from homemade clips to full-fledged TV shows. USA Today. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis News.
  • Greene, R. W. (1998). Another materialist rhetoric. Critical Studies in Mass Communication , 15, 21–41.
  • Gueorguieva, V. (2008). Voters, MySpace, and YouTube: The impact of alternative communication channels on the 2006 election cycle and beyond. Social Science Computer Review , 26, 288–300.
  • Harold, C. (2004). Pranking rhetoric: “Culture jamming” as media activism. Critical Studies in Media Communication , 21, 189–211.
  • Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. University of South Carolina Press: Columbia, South Carolina.
  • Hauser, G. A. (2008). The moral vernacular of human rights discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric , 41, 440–466.
  • Hess, A. (2007). In digital remembrance: Vernacular memory and the rhetorical construction of web memorials. Media, Culture & Society , 29, 812–830.
  • Hess, A. (2009). Resistance up in smoke: Analyzing the limitations of deliberation on YouTube. Critical Studies in Media Communication , 26, 411–434.
  • Howard, R. G. (2005). Toward a theory of the World Wide Web vernacular: The case for pet cloning. Journal of Folklore Research , 42, 323–360.
  • Howard, R. G. (2008). The vernacular web of participatory media. Critical Studies in Media Communication , 25, 490–513.
  • Issenberg, S. (2008, October 11). Supporters jeer as McCain calls Obama ‘a decent person’ Promises civility after days of harsh attacks on rival. The Boston Globe. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis News.
  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Kaye, B. K. , & Johnson, T.J. (2004). A web for all reasons: Uses and gratifications of internet components for political information. Telematics and Informatics , 21, 197–223.
  • Kellner, D. (2003). Media spectacle. . New York: Routledge.
  • McGee, M. C. (1990) Text, context, and the fragmentation of contemporary culture. Western Journal of Communication , 54, 274–284.
  • McKerrow, R. (1989). Critical rhetoric: Theory and praxis. Communication Monographs , 56, 91–111.
  • Milliken, M. , Gibson, K. L. , O'Donnell, S. , & Singer, J. (2008, May). User-Generated Online Video and the Atlantic Canadian Public Sphere: A YouTube Study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, Montreal, Quebec. Retrieved from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p232535_index.html
  • Ono, K. A. , & Sloop, J. M. (1995). The critique of vernacular discourse. Communication Monographs , 62, 19–46.
  • Ono, K. A. , & Sloop, J. M. (2002). Shifting borders: Rhetoric, immigration, and California's Proposition 187. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Orr, J. (2008, October 5). Palin: Obama “palling around with terrorists.” Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from www.csmonitor.com
  • Palser, B. (2008). Politics 2.008. American Journalism Review. Retrieved from http://www.ajr.org/article_printable.asp?id=4355
  • Pilkington, E. (2008, October 13). International: McCain tones down campaign as critics say tactics incite hatred: Republican defends rival against slurs at rallies Democrats up as swing states veer toward Obama. The Guardian. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis News.
  • Schneider, S. M. , & Foot, K. A. (2006). Web campaigning by U.S. presidential primary candidates in 2000 and 2004. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 21–36). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Sloop, J. M. , & Ono, K. A. (1997). Out-law discourse: The critical politics of material judgment. Philosophy and Rhetoric , 30, 51–69.
  • Smith, A. (2009). The internet's role in campaign 2008. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewintemet.0rg/~/media//Files/Reports/2009/The_Intemets_Role_in_Campaign_2008.pdf
  • Stokes, A. Q. (2006). Discrediting Teresa: Wounded by whispers on the web. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 169–186). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. , & Baker, A. B. (2006). Joy and sorrow of interactivity on the campaign trail: Blogs and the primary campaign of Howard Dean. In A. P. Williams & J. C. Tedesco (Eds.), The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004 (pp. 111–132). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Stromer-Galley, J. , & Foot, K. A. (2002). Citizen perceptions of online interactivity and implications for political campaign communication. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 5(1). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue1/stromerandfoot.html
  • Sunstein, C. R. (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Swanson, D. L. (1992). The political-media complex. Communication Monographs , 59, 397–400.
  • Taking the low road . (2008, October 14). The Globe and Mail. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis News.
  • Talisse, R. , & Aikin, S. F. (2006). Two forms of the straw man. Argumentation , 20, 345–352.
  • Thomas, E. (2008, November 18). The great debates. Newsweek. Retrieved from Lexis Nexis News.
  • Topcik, J. (2008, November 2). The election year that was…on YouTube. Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved from http://www.broadcastingcable.com/blog/BC_Beat/10241-The_Election_Year_That_Was_On_YouTube.php
  • Vahlberg, V. (2008, Winter). What young people don't like about the Web-and news on it. Nieman Reports. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100682
  • Walton, D. (1998). Ad hominem arguments. . Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
  • Warnick, B. (2007). Rhetoric online: Persuasion and politics on the World Wide Web. . New York: Peter Lang.
  • Warnick, B. , Xenos, M. , Endres, D. , & Gastil, J. (2005). Effects of campaign-to-user and text-based interactivity in political candidate campaign web sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 10(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol10/issue3/warnick.html
  • Williams, A. P. , & Tedesco, J. C. (2006). The internet election: Perspectives on the web in campaign 2004. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
  • Winograd, M. , & Hais, M. D. (2008). Millennial makeover: MySpace, YouTube, and the future of American politics. . New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

Video References

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.