“The Research Says”: Definitions and Uses of a Key Policy Term in Federal Law and Local School Board Deliberations

References

• Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogenschneider, K. , & Corbett, T. J. (2010). Evidence-based policymaking: Insights from policy-minded researchers and research-minded policymakers. . New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, J. (2002). Public and technical interdependence: Regulatory controversy, out-law discourse, and the messy case of Olestra. Argumentation and Advocacy , 39, 91–109.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. C. (2005). Communication as counterpublic. In G. J. Sheperd , J. St. John & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as… Perspectives on theory (pp. 195–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. C. , & Asen, R. (2010). Introduction: Public modalities, or the metaphors we theorize by. In D. C. Brouwer & R. Asen (Eds.), Public modalities: Rhetoric, culture, media, and the shape of public life (pp. 1–32). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M. , & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: Contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research , 17, 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, C. E. , Toure, J. , & Yamashita, M. (2009). Evidence, interpretation, and persuasion: Instructional decision making at the district central office. Teacher's College Record , 111, 1115–1161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1992). Ethnography, rhetoric, and performance. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 78, 80–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, J. R. (1981). Argument and the “definition of the situation.” Central States Speech Journal , 32, 197–205.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1944). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. . New York: Free Press. (Original work published 1916).
   Google Scholar
• Doxtader, E. (2009). With faith in the works of words: The beginnings of reconciliation in South Africa, 1985–1995. . East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dufour, R. , & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. . Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
   Google Scholar
• Edelman, M. (1971). Politics as symbolic action: Mass arousal and quiescence. . Chicago: Markham.
   Google Scholar
• Fabj, V. , & Sobnosky, M. (1995). AIDS activism and the rejuvenation of the public sphere. Argumentation and Advocacy , 31, 163–184.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 18, 214–227.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, J. , & Honeycutt, L. (2009). When science goes public: From technical arguments to appeals to authority. Studies in Communication Sciences , 9, 19–30.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, P. A. (2005). Schooling America: How the public schools meet the nation's changing needs. . New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society ( T. Burger , Trans.). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press. (Original work published 1962).
   Google Scholar
• Hipp, K. K. , & Weber, P. (2008). Developing a professional learning community among urban school principals. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research , 4, 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, J. M. (1991). Between the public and technical spheres of argument: The “televisual” rhetoric of the nuclear freeze campaign. In D. W. Parson (Ed.), Argument in controversy: Proceedings of the Seventh SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 100–106). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Honig, M. I. , & Coburn, C. (2008). Evidence-based decision making in school district central offices. Educational Policy , 22, 578–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hostetler, K. (2010). (Mis)understanding human beings: Theory, value, and progress in education research. Educational Studies , 46, 400–415.
   Google Scholar
• Howe, K. R. (2005). The question of education science: Experimentism versus experimentalism. Educational Theory , 55, 307–321.
   Google Scholar
• Kanold, T. D. (2006). The flywheel effect: Educators gain momentum from a model for continuous improvement. Journal of Staff Development , 27, 16–21.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufer, D. , & Carley, K. M. (1993). Condensation symbols: Their variety and rhetorical function in political discourse. Philosophy & Rhetoric , 26, 201–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2005). Mapping misconduct: Demarcating legitimate science from “fraud” in the B-06 lumpectomy controversy. Argumentation and Advocacy , 42, 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (2d ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McGee, B. R. (1999). The argument from definition revisited: Race and definition in the progressive era. Argumentation and Advocacy , 35, 141–158.
   Google Scholar
• McGuinn, P.J. (2006). No Child Left Behind and the transformation of education policy, 1965–2005. . Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G. R. (2000). Strategic deception: Rhetoric, science, and politics in missile defense advocacy. . East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, § 9101, 115 Stat. 1552, 1645, 1964–1965 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. E. (2009). Revisiting the professional, personal, and political dimensions of action research. In S. E. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage handbook of educational action research (pp. 6–23). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Palczewski, C. H. (1995). Definitional argument: Approaching a theory. In S. Jackson (Ed.), Argumentation and values: Proceedings on the Ninth SCA/AFA Conference on Argumentation (pp. 176–186). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Parry-Giles, T. (2006). The character of justice: Rhetoric, law, and politics in the Supreme Court confirmation process. . East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perelman, C. , & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation ( J. Wilkinson & P. Weaver , Trans.). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1958).
   Google Scholar
• Pezzullo, P. C. (2003). Resisting ‘National Breast Cancer Awareness Month’: The rhetorics of counterpublics and their cultural performances. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 89, 345–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prelli, L. (1989). A rhetoric of science: Inventing scientific discourse. . Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reyna, V. (2002, February). What is scientifically based evidence? What is its logic? Presentation at the Use of Scientifically Based Research in Education Conference, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, W.J. (2005). America's public schools: From the common school to ‘No Child Left Behind’. . Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, R. (2004). Class and schools: Using social, economic, and educational reform to close the black-white achievement gap. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, R. C. (1986). The relationship between the public and the technical spheres of argument: A case study of the Challenger Seven disaster. Central States Speech Journal , 37, 136–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiappa, E. (2003). Defining reality: Definitions and the politics of meaning. . Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sapir, E. (1934). Symbolism. In E. R. A. Seligman (Ed.), Encyclopaedia of the social sciences (pp. 492–495). New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Servage, L. (2008). Critical and transformative practices in professional learning communities. Teacher Education Quarterly , 35, 63–77.
   Google Scholar
• Shulock, N. B. (1999). The paradox of policy analysis: If it's not used, why do we produce so much of it? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management , 18, 226–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-based education policies: Transforming educational practice and research. Educational Researcher , 31(7), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities , 28, 126–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (1997). Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. . New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. (2001). Persuasive definitions and public policy arguments. Argumentation and Advocacy , 37, 117–132.
   Google Scholar
• Wyckoff, P. G. (2009). Policy and evidence in a partisan age: The great disconnect. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zeichner, K. (2001). Educational Action Research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (pp. 273–283). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar