Persuasive Evidence in India: An Investigation of the Impact of Evidence Types and Evidence Quality

References

• Allen, M. (2009). Meta-analysis. Communication Monographs , 76, 398–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, M. , Bruflat, R. , Fucilla, R. , Kramer, M. , McKellips, S. , Ryan, D. J. , & Spiegelhoff, M. (2000). Testing the persuasiveness of evidence: Combining narrative and statistical forms. Communication Research Reports , 17, 331–336.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, M. , & Preiss, R. W. (1997). Comparing the persuasiveness of narrative and statistical evidence using meta-analysis. Communication Research Reports , 14, 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Aron, A. , & Aron, E. N. (1997). Statistics for the behavioral and social sciences: A brief course. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Baesler, E. J. (1997). Persuasive effects of story and statistical evidence. Argumentation and Advocacy , 33, 170–175.
   Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L. , & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research , 44, 175–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Central Intelligence Agency (2011). The World Factbook. Retrieved July 14, 2011, from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Combs, S. C. (2004). The useless-/usefulness of argumentation: The Dao of disputation. Argumentation and Advocacy , 41, 58–70.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. , & Smith, E. E. (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71, 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garssen, B. J. (1997). Argumentatieschema's in pragma-dialectisch perspectief: Een theoretisch en empirisch onderzoek [Argumentation schemes in a pragma-dialectic perspective: A theoretical and empirical study] , Amsterdam: IFOTT.
   Google Scholar
• Gillon, B. S. (2008). An early Buddhist text on logic: Fang Bian Xin Lun. Argumentation , 22, 15–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, K. , & Brinn, L. S. (2003). Messages influencing college women's tanning bed use: Statistical versus narrative evidence format and a self-assessment to increase perceived susceptibility. Journal of Health Communication , 8, 443–461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeken, H. , & Hustinx, L. (2003). The relative persuasiveness of different types of evidence. In F. H. van Eemeren , J. A. Blair , C. A. Willard , & A. F. Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 497–501). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeken, H. , & Hustinx, L. (2007). The influence of additional information on the persuasiveness of flawed arguments by analogy. In F. H. van Eemeren , J. A. Blair , C. A. Willard , & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 625–630). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeken, H. , & Hustinx, L. (2009). When is statistical evidence superior to anecdotal evidence in supporting probability claims? The role of argument type. Human Communication Research , 35, 491–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J. (2005). A review of experimental research on the relative persuasiveness of anecdotal, statistical, causal, and expert evidence. Studies in Communication Sciences , 5, 205–216.
   Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J. (2008). Comparing the actual and expected persuasiveness of evidence types: How good are lay people at selecting persuasive evidence? Argumentation , 22, 555–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornikx, J. , & Hoeken, H. (2007). Cultural differences in the persuasiveness of evidence types and evidence quality. Communication Monographs , 74, 443–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. (1992). Message effects research: Principles of design and analysis. . New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, J. V. (1992). Values and practices in Asian argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy , 28, 153–166.
   Google Scholar
• Kellermann, K. (1980). The concept of evidence: A critical review. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 16, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, N. , & Nisbett, R. E. (2007). Culture, class and cognition: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Cognition and Culture , 7, 283–291.
   Google Scholar
• Koballa, T. R. (1986). Persuading teachers to reexamine the innovative elementary science programs of yesterday: The effect of anecdotal versus data-summary communications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 23, 437–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsey, M. W. , & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McCroskey, J. C. (1969). A summary of experimental research on the effects of evidence in persuasive communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 55, 169–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, J. G. (1984). Culture and the development of everyday social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 46, 961–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monga, A. B. , & John, D. R. (2007). Cultural differences in brand extension evaluation: The influence of analytic versus holistic thinking. Journal of Consumer Research , 33, 529–536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E. (2003). The geography of thought: How Asians and Westerners think differently… and why. . London: Nicolas Brealey.
   Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R. E. , Peng, K. , Choi, I. , & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review , 108, 291–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norenzayan, A. , Smith, E. E. , Kim, B. J. , & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science , 26, 653–684.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oetke, C. (1996). Ancient Indian logic as a theory of non-monotonic reasoning. Journal of Indian Philosophy , 24, 447–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyserman, D. , Coon, H. M. , & Kemmelmeier, M. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin , 128, 3–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parrott, R. , Silk, K. , Dorgan, K. , Condit, C. , & Harris, T. (2005). Risk comprehension and judgments of statistical evidentiary appeals: When a picture is not worth a thousand words. Human Communication Research , 31, 423–452.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinard, J. C. (1988). The empirical study of the persuasive effects of evidence: The status after fifty years of research. Human Communication Research , 15, 3–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, R. A. , & Reynolds, J. L. (2002). Evidence. In J. P. Dillard , & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 427–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rossiter, J. R. (2002). The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing , 19, 305–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellens, P. J. (1985). Redelijke argumenten: Een onderzoek naar normen voor kritische lezers [Reasonable arguments: A study in criteria for critical reading] , Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, H. (1999). Argument quality and cultural difference. Argumentation , 13, 183–201.
   Google Scholar
• Slater, M. D. , & Rouner, D. (1996). Value-affirmative and value-protective processing of alcohol education messages that include statistical evidence or anecdotes. Communication Research , 23, 210–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillemans, F. J. F. (2008). Introduction: Buddhist argumentation. Argumentation , 22, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varnum, M. E. W. , Grossmann, I. , Katunar, D. , Nisbett, R. E. , & Kitayama, S. (2008). Holism in a European cultural context: Differences in cognitive style between central and east Europeans and Westerners. Journal of Cognition and Culture , 8, 321–333.
   Google Scholar
• Walton, D. N. (1997). Appeal to expert opinion: Arguments from authority. . University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warnick, B. , & Inch, E. S. (1989). Critical thinking and communication: The use of reason in argument. . New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar