A Functional Analysis of 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Debates

References

• Balz, D. (2012, July 29). 8 Questions. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (1999). Seeing spots: A functional analysis of presidential television advertisements, 1952–1996 . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2003). Topic of presidential campaign discourse and election outcome. Western Journal of Communication , 67, 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. . New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Blaney, J. R. , & Pier, P. M. (1998). Campaign '96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Brazeal, L. M. (2002). A functional analysis of the 1988 Bush-Dukakis presidential debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 38, 219–233.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Hansen, G. J. , & Stein, K. A. (2004). News coverage of presidential primary debates. Argumentation and Advocacy , 40, 246–258.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Hansen, G. J. , & Verser, R. M. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 70, 335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Harthcock, A. (1999). Functions of the great debates: Acclaims, attacks, and defenses in the 1960 presidential debates. Communication Monographs , 66, 341–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Henson, J. R. , & Sudbrock, L. A. (2011). A functional analysis of 2008 American presidential primary debates. Argumentation: Inquiry and Advocacy , 48, 97–110.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , McKinney, M. S. , & Stephenson, M. T. (2002). Effects of watching campaign 2000 presidential primary debates. Journal of Communication , 52, 316–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Pier, P. M. , Brazeal, L. M. , McHale, J. P. , Klyukovksi, A. , & Aime, D. (2002). The primary decision: A functional analysis of debates in presidential primaries. . Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , Stein, K. A , McHale, J. P. , Chattopadhyay, S. , Verser, R. , & Price, S. (2007). Bush versus Kerry: A functional analysis of campaign 2004. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L. , & Stephenson, M. T. (2004). Effects of watching a presidential primary debate. Contemporary Argumentation and Debate , 25, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berelson, B. (1952). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. . Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Berquist, G. F. (1960). The Kennedy-Humphrey debate. Today's Speech , 8(2–3), 31.
   Google Scholar
• Best, S.J. , & Hubbard, C. (2000). The role of televised debates in the presidential nominating process. In W. G. Mayer (Ed.), In pursuit of the White House 2000: How we choose our presidential nominees (pp. 255–284). New York, NY: Chatham House.
   Google Scholar
• Blankenship, J. , Fine, M. G. , & Davis, L. K. (1983). The 1980 Republican primary debates: The transformation of actor to scene. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 64, 25–36.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 20, 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellweg, S. A. , & Phillips, S. L. (1981). A verbal and visual analysis of the 1980 Houston Republican primary debate. Southern Speech Communication Journal , 47, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Holsti, O. (1969). Content analysis in communication research. . New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman, J. W. (2005). Political affiliation and presidential debates: A real-time analysis of the effect of the arguments used in the presidential debates. American Behavioral Scientist , 49, 229–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kane, T. (1987). The Dewey-Stassen primary debate of 1948: An examination of format for presidential debates. In J. Wenzel (Ed.), Argument and critical practices (pp. 249–253). Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, H. (2008, April 18). Performance by ABC's moderators is a matter of debate. The Washington Post , p. CI.
   Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R. , & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics , 33, 159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanoue, D.J. , & Schrott, P. R. (1989). Voter's reactions to televised presidential debates: Measurement of the source and magnitude of opinion change. Political Psychology , 10, 275–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemert, J. B. , Elliot, W. R. , Nestfold, K.J. , & Rarick, G. R. (1983). Effects of viewing a presidential primary debate: An experiment. Communication Research , 10, 155–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmott, M. , & Carnia, C. (2007, November 28). GOP presidential candidates to go another round. USA Today , p. 5A.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt, S. (1984). Negative political advertising: Some empirical findings. Journal of Advertising , 13, 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2008, April 14). Democrat debates: One year later it's Clinton vs. Obama. USA Today , p. 6A.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1984). A comparative assessment of intra-party political debate formats. Political Communication Review , 8, 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1987). The influence of intraparty debates on candidate preference. Communication Research , 14, 687–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M. (1988). Intra-party political debates and issue learning. Journal of Applied Communication Research , 16, 99–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, R. F. (1961). Thomas E. Dewey: The great Oregon debate of 1948. In R. Reid (Ed.), American public address: Studies in honor of Albert Craig Baird (pp. 245–270). Columbia: University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reinemann, C. , & Maurer, M. (2005). Unifying or polarizing? Short-term effects and postdebate consequences of different rhetorical strategies in televised debates. Journal of Communication , 55, 775–794.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stelzner, H. G. (1971). Humphrey and Kennedy court West Virginia, May 3, 1960. Southern Speech Journal , 37, 21–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, C.J. (1975). Voter perception of mud-slinging in political communication. Central States Speech Journal , 26, 279–286.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, V. , Golden, J. L. , & James, H. (1988). Perceptions of the 1984 presidential debates and a select 1988 presidential primary debate. Presidential Studies Quarterly , 18, 541–563.
   Google Scholar
• Yawn, M. , Ellsworth, K , Beatty, B. , & Kahn, K. F. (1998). How a presidential primary debate changed attitudes of audience members. Political Behavior , 20, 155–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar