Deliberation and Trust

References

• Allen, D. S. (2004). Talking to strangers: Anxieties of citizenship since Brown v. Board of Education. . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• American National Election Studies . (2010). The ANES guide to public opinion and political behavior [table 5A.1], Retrieved from www.electionstudies.org/nesguide/toptable/tab5a_1.htm
   Google Scholar
• Asen, R. (2004). A discourse theory of citizenship. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 90, 189–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behn, R. D. (2002). Government performance and the conundrum of political trust. In J. D. Donahue & J. S. Nye, Jr. (Eds.), Market-based governance: Supply side, demand side, upside, and downside (pp. 323–348). Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, S. (1996). Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Democracy and difference: Contesting the boundaries of the political (pp. 67–94). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bohman, J. (1996). Public deliberation: Pluralism, complexity, and democracy. . Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Brockriede, W. (1975). Where is argument? Journal of the American Forensic Association , 11, 179–182.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, D. C. (2006). Communication as counterpublic. In G. J. Sheperd , J. St. John , & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as… perspectives on theory (pp. 195–208). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bryk, A. S. , & Schneider, B. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhalter, S. , Gastil, J. , & Kelshaw, K. (2002). A conceptual definition and theoretical model of public deliberation in small face-to-face groups. Communication Theory , 12, 398–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. , & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Catterberg, G. , & Moreno, A. (2005). The individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research , 18, 31–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. A. , & Smith, T. W. (2009). General social surveys, 1972–2008. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. (1988). Creative democracy—the task before us. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey the later works, 1925–1953 (Vol. 14: 1939–1941, pp. 224–230). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1939)
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, T. B. (1993). Norms of rhetorical culture. . New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Festenstein, M. (2005). Negotiating diversity: Culture, deliberation, trust. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. (1990). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text , 25/26, 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. . New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2006). Communication as deliberation. In G. J. Shepherd , J. St. John , & T. Striphas (Eds.), Communication as… perspectives on theory (pp. 164–173). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gastil, J. (2008). Political communication and deliberation. . Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A. , & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? . Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Reason and the rationalization of society (Vol. 1) ( T. McCarthy , Trans.) Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981)
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action ( C. Lenhardt & S. W. Nicholsen , Trans.). Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hariman, R. (2007). Amateur hour: Knowing what to love in ordinary democracy. In K. Tracy , J. P. McDaniel , & B. E. Gronbeck (Eds.), The prettier doll: Rhetoric, discourse, and ordinary democracy (pp. 218–249). Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (Ed.) (2004). Distrust. . New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (2006). Trust. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, G. A. , & Benoit-Barne, C. (2002). Reflections on rhetoric, deliberative democracy, civil society, and trust. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 5, 261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. (2002). The promise(s) of deliberative democracy. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 5, 223–260.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, R. G. (2011). Digital Jesus: The making of a new fundamentalist Christian community on the internet. . New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R. (1999). Postmodernism erodes respect for authority, but increases support for democracy. In P. Norris (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 236–256). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivie, R. L. (1998). Democratic deliberation in a rhetorical republic. Quarterly Journal of Speech , 84, 491–505.
   Google Scholar
• Ivie, R. L. (2002). Rhetorical deliberation and democratic politics in the here and now. Rhetoric & Public Affairs , 5, 277–285.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, L. R. , Cook, F. L. , & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2009). Talking together: Public deliberation and political participation in America. . Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keith, W. M. (2007). Democracy as discussion: Civic education and the American forum movement. . Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Keränen, L. (2010). Scientific characters: Rhetoric, politics, and trust in breast cancer research. . Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kock, C. , & Villadsen, L. (2012). Introduction: Citizenship as rhetorical practice. In C. Kock & L. Villadsen (Eds.), Rhetorical citizenship and public deliberation (pp. 1–10). University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langsdorf, L. (1997). Argument as inquiry in a postmodern context. Argumentation , 11, 315–237.
   Google Scholar
• Lenard, P. T. (2010). Rebuilding trust in an era of widening wealth inequality. Journal of Social Philosophy , 41, 73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. . New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mackie, G. (2001). Patterns of trust in Western Europe and their genesis. In K. S. Cook (Ed.), Trust in society (pp. 245–282). New York, NY: Russell Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maddox, G. (2008). Truth telling and the fragility of democracy. Social Alternatives , 28, 17–21.
   Google Scholar
• Markovits, E. (2006). The trouble with being earnest: Deliberative democracy and the sincerity norm. Journal of Political Philosophy , 14, 249–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misztal, B. A. (1996). Trust in modern societies. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participative democracy. . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review , 22, 201–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficits: Critical citizens revisited. . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'Keefe, D. J. (1977). Two concepts of argument. Journal of the American Forensic Association , 13, 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, O. (1999). Liberty against the democratic state: On the historical and contemporary sources of American distrust. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 151–207). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science and Politics , 28, 664–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. . New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2007). E pluribus unum: Diversity and community in the twenty-first century. Scandinavian Political Studies , 30, 137–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism (Pbk ed.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. R. (2003). The law of group polarization. In J. S. Fishkin & P. Laslett (Eds.), Debating deliberative democracy (pp. 80–101). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. . Albany: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tracy, K. (2010). Challenges of ordinary democracy: A case study in deliberation and dissent. . University Park: Pennsylvania University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2000–2001). Producing and consuming trust. Political Science Quarterly , 115, 569–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (1999). Introduction. In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 1–21). Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willard, C. A. (1987). Valuing dissensus. In F. H. van Eemeren , R. Grootendorst , J. A. Blair , & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Argumentation: Across the lines of discipline (pp. 145–157). Dordrecht, NL: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Wuthnow, R. (1999). The role of trust in civic renewal. In R. K. Fullinwider (Ed.), Civil society, demoaacy, and civic renewal (pp. 209–230). New York, NY: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zmerli, S. , & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes toward democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly , 72, 706–724.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar