Policy debate topic change controversies in the U.S. and Japan

References

• Arima, Tesuo. 2008. Nuclear Power Plant, Shoriki, and CIA: Reading a Black History of the Showa Era in the Classified Documents. Tokyo: Shinchosha.
   Google Scholar
• Bartanen, Michael D., and Robert S. Littlefield. 2014. Forensics in America: A history. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Committee for Intercollegiate Discussion and Debate. 1986. American Forensics Association Collection. Acc. #418, Box 11, Folder 7. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Eckstein, Justin, and Stephen M. Llano. 2016. “The Other British Invasion: Theorizing British Parliamentary Debate.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 35: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• English, Eric, Stephen M. Llano, Gordon R. Mitchell, Catherine E. Morrison, John Rief, and Carly Woods. 2007. “Debate as a Weapon of Mass Destruction.” Communication & Critical/Cultural Studies 4: 222–226.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, Deirdre. 2001. “Real-Life Debates.” Winston-Salem Journal, November 19, A1/A4.
   Google Scholar
• Freeley, Austin J., and David L. Steinberg. 2008. Argumentation and Debate: Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making. 12th ed. Boston, MA: Wadsworth/Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, Ryan. 1993. “Letter Regarding Flood Action Plan Circulated at the National Debate Tournament.” University of Northern Iowa, Cedar Falls, Iowa, October 29.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. Thomas, and Gordon R., Mitchell. 2008. “Forensics as Scholarship: Testing Zarefsky's Bold Hypothesis in a Digital Age.” Argumentation & Advocacy 45: 80–97.
   Google Scholar
• Goodnight, G. Thomas, Minhee Son, Jin Huang, and Ann Crigler. 2017. “Youth, Networks, and Civic Engagement: Communities of Belonging and Communities of Practice.” In Speech and Debate as Civic Education, edited by J. Michael, Hogan, Jessica A. Kurr Michael J. Bergmaier, and Jeremy D. Johnson, 205–220. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grandpre, Lawrence. 2014. “The Negrophobia/Negrophilia Paradaox and Liberal (Academic) White Supremacy.” In The Black Book: Reflections from the Baltimore Grassroots, edited by L. Grandpre and D. Love, 41–110. Baltimore, MD: Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, Ronald Walter, and Darrin Hicks. 2005. “Lost Convictions: Debating Both Sides and the Ethical Self-Fashioning of Liberal Citizens.” Cultural Studies 19: 100–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Ronald, and Darrin Hicks. 2017. “Debating Conviction: From Sincere Belief to Affective Atmosphere.” In Speech and Debate as Civic Education, edited by J. Michael Hogan, Jessica A. Kurr, Michael J. Bergmaier, and Jeremy D. Johnson, 149–162. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hellman, Hugo E. 1949. Open Letter to Undisclosed Debate Coaches. American Forensics Association Collection. Acc. #418, Box 5, Folder 3. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Darrin, and Ronald Walter Greene. 2000. “Debating Both Sides: Argument Pedagogy and the Production of the Deliberative Citizen.” In Argument at Century's End: Reflecting on the Past and Envisioning the Future, edited by Thomas Hollihan, 300–307. Annandale, VA: National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, Duane. 2001a. “A Reasonable Idea.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 29 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035545.html
   Google Scholar
• Hyland, Duane. 2001b. “Re: Dixie Topic Change Thoughts.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 19 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035588.html
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen, Richard C. Bell, and Rory O'Connor. 1983. Nukespeak: The Selling of Nuclear Technology in America. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, Jason. 2001. “Today Don't Justify NMD.” Edebate Forum, September 11. Accessed 20 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036682.html
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Henry. 2006. Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Trace. 2001. “A Reasonable Idea.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 14 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035542.html
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Mark. 2001. “SOLUTIONS.” Edebate Forum, September 11. Accessed 20 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036653.html
   Google Scholar
• Koch, James. 1954. Letter to the Committee on Intercollegiate Debate and Discussion. October 1. Faculty papers, Karl R. Wallace, Series V. Communication Pedagogy, C. Miscellaneous Papers R_Z, Box 22, Group 40/11, Folder 49. Archives of the University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
   Google Scholar
• Kucinich, Dennis J. 2003. “Petition Drive Targets Bush Advisor Karl Rove.” In Congressional Record—Extensions of Remarks, E1443–E1444. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, David. 2010. Vico and the Transformation of Rhetoric in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBath, James. 1960. Letter to AFA Officials and Council. American Forensics Association Collection. Acc. #418, Box 1, Folder 2. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 1998a. “Pedagogical Possibilities for Argumentative Agency in Academic Debate.” Argumentation & Advocacy 35: 41–60.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 1998b. “Reflexive Fiat.” The Rostrum 72: 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 2001a. “Retaliation.” Edebate Forum, September 11. Accessed 20 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036674.html
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 2001b. Wake Forest Dixie Classic Debate-in Round 7 Interviews. November 18. Winston Salem, NC: Wake Forest University. Accessed 23 October 2017. http://www.pitt.edu/∼gordonm/Debatein/Debate-ininterviews.html
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 2001c. “Debate-in Quotables.” Accessed 24 October 2017. http://www.pitt.edu/∼gordonm/Debatein/quotes.html
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 2010. “Switch-Side Debating Meets Demand-Driven Rhetoric of Science.” Rhetoric & Public Affairs 13: 95–120.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Gordon R. 2011. “Student-Led Public Debate as Cultural Technology.” Controversia 7: 54–75.
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Debate in Education. 2011. “Invitation to 2004 Debate Koshien and District Qualifiers.” Accessed 17 April 2011. http://nade.jp/koshien/2004/20040420.html
   Google Scholar
• NADE-Kanto/Koshinetsu Debate Mail News. 2011. April 4. No. 168. Accessed 8 April 2011. http://nade-kanto.info
   Google Scholar
• National Association of Debate in Education Tokai District. 2011. “The 15th Tokai District Spring Junior and Senior High School Debate Tournament.” March. Accessed 8 April 2011. http://www.kinjo-u.ac.jp/futatsugi/tokai.html
   Google Scholar
• The National Association of Debate in Education & Yomiuri Newspaper Company. 2011a. “The 16th Championship (2011).” February 25. Accessed 8 April 2011. http://nade.jp/koshien/2011/index.html
   Google Scholar
• The National Association of Debate in Education & Yomiuri Newspaper Company. 2011b. “The Proposition Change for the 16th Debate Koshien High School Division.” March 19. Accessed 8 April 2011. http://nade.jp/modules/wordpress/index.php?p=239
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Power Debate Disappears: The Nation After the Natural Disaster, Volume 1. 2011. Asahi Newspaper (Chiba; Morning Ed.), May 1, 35.
   Google Scholar
• Ohnishi, Norimitsu. 2011. “Safety Myth” Left Japan Ripe for Nuclear Crisis.” New York Times (Late Ed.), July 25, A1.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, Kathryn M., and G. Thomas Goodnight. 1994. “Entanglements of Consumption, Cruelty, Privacy, and Fashion: The Social Controversy Over Fur.” The Quarterly Journal of Speech 80 (3): 249–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 23 Percent of Children Found Acousticophobic: A National Survey of 500 Mothers. 2011. Chunichi Newspaper (Evening Ed.), July 12. Accessed 30 July 2012. http://iryou.chunichi.co.jp/article/detail/20110713163424119.
   Google Scholar
• Reid-Brinkley, Shanara R. 2008. “The Harsh Realities of ‘Acting Black’: How African-American Policy Debaters Negotiate Representation Through Racial Performance and Style.” PhD diss., University of Georgia.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, F. H. 1969. “A Historical Review of Debate Resolution Selection.” Forensics of Pi Kappa Delta 55 (1): 3–7, 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, Robert C. 1984. “Topic Selection in Debate.” In American Forensics in Perspective: Papers from: The Second National Conference on Forensics, edited by D. W. Parson, 53–58. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rumsfeld, Donald. 2004. “Prepared Testimony. Eighth Public Hearing of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States”, March 23. http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/11907.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Satake, Makoto. 2011. “Prosecuting 25 Nuclear Power Intellectuals Who Beg for Electric Power Companies: A Closing Argument.” Weekly Kinyobi, April 15, 843: 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• SCA Committee on Intercollegiate Discussion and Debate. 1984. Announcement of 1984–85 Propositions and Questions. American Forensics Association Collection. Acc. #418, Box 11, Folder 7. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Shibata, Hidetoshi. 1985. A Memoire on the Post-War Mass Media. Tokyo: Chuo Koronsha.
   Google Scholar
• Solt, Roger. 2004. “Debate's Culture of Narcissism.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 25: 43–65.
   Google Scholar
• Spring, Sarah. 2010. “Flexible Debate Topics Revisited: The Case for Logical Limited Resolutional Conditionality.” Contemporary Argumentation and Debate 31: 56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Srader, Doyle. 2001. “Re: Dixie Topic Change Thoughts.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 14 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035595.html
   Google Scholar
• Stroube, Jack. 2001a. “Solutions.” Edebate Forum. September 11, Accessed 21 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036671.html.
   Google Scholar
• Stroube, Jack. 2001b. “First CSIS-CIA card.” Edebate Forum, September 12. Accessed 21 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036722.html
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki, Takeshi. 2012. “Why Do Humans Reason Sometimes and Avoid Doing It Other Times?: Kotodama in Japanese Culture.” Argumentation and Advocacy 48: 178–180.
   Google Scholar
• Vanette, David. 2001. “The Aftermath.” Edebate Forum, September 11. Accessed 20 May 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-September/036672.html
   Google Scholar
• Wade, Melissa M. 2017. “Pathways to Civic Education: Communities of Belonging and Communities of Practice.” In Speech and Debate as Civic Education, edited by J. Michael Hogan, Jessica A. Kurr, Michael J. Bergmaier, and Jeremy D. Johnson, 221–236. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, Ben. 2001. “Resolution Change.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 14 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035606.html
   Google Scholar
• Watt, Sarah S. 2017. “Debaters as Citizens: Rethinking Debate Frameworks to Address the Policy/Performance Divide.” In Speech and Debate as Civic Education, edited by J. Michael Hogan, Jessica A. Kurr, Michael J. Bergmaier, and Jeremy D. Johnson, 163–176. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winters, Joseph R. 2016. Hope Draped in Black: Race, Melancholy, and the Agony of Progress. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zarefsky, David. 1977 Memorandum to the Midwestern Forensic Association. American Forensics Association Collection. Acc. #418, Box 14, Folder 7. Salt Lake City: University of Utah.
   Google Scholar
• Zompetti. 2001. “Re: Dixie Topic Change.” Edebate Forum, October 9. Accessed 14 June 2012. http://cedadebate.org/pipermail/mailman/2001-October/035595.html
   Google Scholar