Meeting the commander-in-waiting: Undecided voters and the 2016 vice-presidential debate

References

• ABC News. 2016. “VP Debate Night.” Facebook Video. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/ABCNews/videos/10154859717068812/
   Google Scholar
• Agiesta, J. 2016. October 5. “Pence Edges Kaine in VP Debate Instant Poll.” CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/05/politics/mike-pence-tim-kaine-vp-debate-poll/
   Google Scholar
• Bachl M., and S. Ottler. (Eds.). 2013. Das TV-duell in Baden-Württemberg 2011: Inhalte, Wahrnehmungen und Wirkungen. [The televised debate in Baden-Wuerttemberg 2011: Contents, perceptions, and effects]. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. 2012. “Vice Presidential Selection in the Convention Era: Experience or Electoral Advantage ?” Congress & the Presidency 39(3): 297–315. doi:10.1080/07343469.2012.708698
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, J. C., J. S. Morris, and N. L. Walth. 2012. “The Fey effect.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(1): 95–104. doi:10.1093/poq/nfr060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., and D. Airne. 2005. “A Functional Analysis of American Vice Presidential Debates.” Argumentation & Advocacy 41(4): 225–236. doi:10.1080/00028533.2005.11821632
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., and J. R. Henson. 2009. “A Functional Analysis of the 2008 Vice Presidential Debate: Biden Versus Palin.” Argumentation & Advocacy 46(1): 39–50. doi:10.1080/00028533.2009.11821715
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, W. L., G. J. Hansen, and R. M. Verser. 2003. “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Viewing Presidential Debates.” Communication Monographs 70(4): 335–350. doi:10.1080/0363775032000179133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boccagno, J. 2016. October 5. “Pence v Kaine – Who Won the Social Media Debate ?” CBS News. Retrieved from http://www.cbsnews.com/news/mike-pence-tim-kaine-on-social-media-vice-presidential-debate
   Google Scholar
• Bostdorff, D. M. 1991. “Vice-Presidential Comedy and the Traditional Female Role: An Examination of the Rhetorical Characteristics of the Vice Presidency.” Western Journal of Speech Communication 55(1): 1–27. doi:10.1080/10570319109374368
   Google Scholar
• Brownell, R. E. 2016. “The Law: Vice Presidential Inability: Historical Episodes that Highlight a Significant Constitutional Problem.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 46(2): 434–456. doi:10.1111/psq.12277
   Google Scholar
• Carlin, D. B., and P. J. Bicak. 1993. “Toward a Theory of Vice Presidential Debate Purposes: An Analysis of the 1992 Vice Presidential.” Argumentation & Advocacy 30(2): 119–131. doi:10.1080/00028533.1993.11951581
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J. 2016. October 4. “Why the Vice-Presidential Debate does and Doesn't Matter.” New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/news/john-cassidy/why-the-vice-presidential-debate-does-and-doesnt-matter
   Google Scholar
• Collins, E. 2016. August 31. “Poll: Clinton, Trump Most Unfavorable Candidates Ever.” USA Today. Retrieved from http://usat.ly/2cesCEv
   Google Scholar
• Confessore, N., and M. Flegenheimer. 2016. October 4. “Vice-Presidential Debate: What You Missed.” New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2dsDlcx
   Google Scholar
• Costa, R., J. Johnson, and D. A. Fahrenthold. 2016. October 4. “The VP Debate: Kaine, Pence get into a Bitter Dispute Over Trump's Comments about Undocumented Mexican Immigrants.” Washington Post. Retrieved from http://wpo.st/i10S2
   Google Scholar
• Devine, C. J., and K. C. Kopko. 2016. The VP Advantage: How Running Maters Influence Home State Voting in Presidential Elections. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dorsher, M., J. Kapfer, J. Larson, D. Crowley, and H. Waller. 2009. “The 2008 Debates in the United States and Canada: How U. S. and Canadian Viewers, Listeners and Readers Pick Their Winners.” Conference Papers – Midwestern Political Science Association. 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards III G. C., and L. R. Jacobs. 2008. “The New Vice Presidency: Institutions and Politics.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38(3): 369–373. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02649.x
   Google Scholar
• Enten, H. 2016. October 6. “Election Update: Clinton's Lead is Becoming Safer.” FiveThiryEight. Retrieved from http://53eig.ht/2dVU33y
   Google Scholar
• Erikson, R. S., and C. Wlezien. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns do (and do not) Matter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Everbach, T. 2014. “American Women Never Again will be Second-Class Citizens: Analyzing New York Times Coverage of Geraldine Ferraro's 1984 Vice-Presidential Bid.” Southwestern Mass Communication Journal 29(2): 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Gellman, B. 2008. Angler: The Cheney Vice Presidency. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. K. 2008. “The Rising Power of the Modern Vice Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38(3): 374–389.
   Google Scholar
• Grynbaum, M. M. 2016. October 5. “Vice-Presidential Debate Generates Fireworks, but not Ratings.” New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2dFKBDK
   Google Scholar
• Hartig, H., J. Lapinski, and S. Psyllos. 2016. October 4. “Poll: Vice Presidential Candidates Mike Pence, Tim Kaine Largely Unknown to Voters.” NBC News. Retrieved from http://nbcnews.to/2dGhthr
   Google Scholar
• Heersink, B., and B. D. Peterson. 2016. “Measuring the Vice-Presidential Home State Advantage with Synthetic Controls.” American Politics Research 44(4): 734–763. doi:10.1177/1532673X16642567
   Google Scholar
• Hemmer, N. 2016. July 21. “Why the Vice Presidency Matters.” Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/07/why-the-vice-presidency-matters/492128/
   Google Scholar
• Hiller, M., and D. Kriner. 2008. “Institutional Change and the Dynamics of Vice Presidential Selection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38(3): 401–421. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02652.x
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, K. H., and D. S. Birdsell. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jarman, J. W. 2005. “Political Affiliation and Presidential Debates: A Real-Time Analysis of the Effect of the Arguments Used in the Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 49(2): 229–242. doi:10.1177/0002764205280921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasperson, A. E., J. Gollins, and D. Walls. 2017. “Polarization in the 2012 Presidential Debates: A Moment-To-Moment, Dynamic Analysis of Audience Reactions in Ohio and Florida.” In Political Communication in Real Time: Theoretical and Applied Approaches, edited by D. Schill, R. Kirk, and A. E. Jasperson, 225–248. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtzleben, D. 2016. June 1. “How might Trump or Clinton pick a Running Mate? Here's What the Data Say.” NPR. Retrieved from https://n.pr/1qXHaLe
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., and D. B. Carlin. 2004. “Political Campaign Debates.” In Handbook of Political Communication Research, edited by L. L. Kaid. 203–234. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney, M. S., and B. R. Warner. 2013. “Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects.” Argumentation & Advocacy 49(4): 238–258. doi:10.1080/00028533.2013.11821800
   Google Scholar
• McKinnon, L. M., and J. C. Tedesco. 1999. “The Influence of Medium and Media Commentary on Presidential Debate Effects.” In The Electronic Election: Perspectives on the 1996 Campaign, edited by L. L. Kaid and D. G. Bystrom, 191–206. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, R. 2008. “The Making of the Modern Vice Presidency: A Personal Reflection.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 38(3): 390–400. doi:10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02651.x
   Google Scholar
• Nagel, F., M. Maurer, and C. Reinemann. 2012. “Is There a Visual Dominance in Political Communication? How Verbal, Visual, and Vocal Communication Shape Viewers’ Impressions of Political Candidates.” Journal of Communication 62(5): 833–850. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01670.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2016. Faith and the 2016 Campaign. Retrieved from http://pewrsr.ch/1QCU0c3
   Google Scholar
• Polsby, N. W., A. Wildavsky, S. E. Schier, and D. A. Hopkins. 2011. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. 13th ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, R. J. 2004. “The Strategic Importance of State-Level Factors in Presidential Elections.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 34(3): 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a005033
   Google Scholar
• Rathbone, M. 2011. “The U.S. Vice Presidency Today.” Political Insight 2(3): 28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, D. 2017. “The History, Reliability, Validity, and Utility of Real Time Response.” In Political Communication in Real Time: Theoretical and Applied Approaches, edited by D. Schill, R. Kirk, and A. E. Jasperson, 1–28. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schill, D., and R. Kirk. 2014. “Courting the Swing Voter: ‘Real Time' Insights Into the 2008 and 2012 U.S. Presidential Debates.” American Behavioral Scientist 58(4): 536–555. doi:10.1177/0002764213506204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. 2016. March 24. “Indiana Governor Signs Abortion Bill with Added Restrictions.” New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2kq4bUn
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M. S., M. Rosenberg, A. Goldman, and M. Apuzzo. 2017. January 19. “Intercepted Russian Communications Part of Inquiry into Trump Associates.” New York Times. Retrieved from https://nyti.ms/2jFcK0n.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, C. 2012. July 5. “By the Numbers: Vice Presidents.” CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/05/politics/btn-vice-presidents/
   Google Scholar
• "The once and future Humphrey. " 1968. May 3. Time 98: 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Ulbig, S. G. 2010. “The Appeal of Second Bananas: The Impact of Vice Presidential Candidates on Presidential Vote Choice, Yesterday and Today.” American Politics Research 38(2): 330–355. doi:10.1177/0891988709358950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Den Berg, E. 1998. “Supersalesman for the Great Society: Vice President Hubert H. Humphrey, 1965-1969.” American Studies International 36(3): 59–73.
   Google Scholar
• Waisanen, D. J., and A. B. Becker. 2015. “The Problem with Being Joe Biden: Political Comedy and Circulating Personae.” Critical Studies in Media Communication 32(4): 256–271. doi:10.1080/15295036.2015.1057516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R., D. B. Carlin, K. Winfrey, J. Schnoebelen, and M. Trosanovski. 2011. “Will the ‘Real' Candidates for President and Vice President Please Stand Up? 2008 Pre- and Post-Debate Viewer Perceptions of Candidate Image.” American Behavioral Scientist 55(3): 232–252. doi:10.1177/0002764210392160
   Google Scholar
• Warner, B. R., and M. S. McKinney. 2013. “To Unite and Divide: The Polarizing Effect of Presidential Debates.” Communication Studies 63(5): 508–527. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832341
   Google Scholar
• Wohlsen, M. 2016. October 4. “The Vice Presidential Debate was a Lot More Fun on Twitter.” Wired. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/2016/10/vice-presidential-debate-lot-fun-twitter/
   Google Scholar
• Zurcher, A. 2016. October 4. “Why the US Vice-Presidential Debate Matters.” BBC. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37455377
   Google Scholar