What Can a Hypnotic Induction Do?

References

• Andrews, J. D. W. (1989). Integrating visions of reality: Interpersonal diagnosis and the existential vision. American Psychologist, 44, 803–817. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.5.803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I. (1991). Toward a social-psychobiological model of hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 564–598). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I., Gősi-Greguss, A. C., Vágó, P., Varga, K., & Horváth, R. (1990). Interactional approach to the understanding of hypnosis: Theoretical background and main findings. In R. Van Dyck, P. Spinhoven, A. Van Der Does, Y. Van Rood, & W. De Moor (Eds.), Hypnosis: Current theory, research and practice (pp. 52–69). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Free University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bányai, É. I., & Hilgard, E. R. (1976). A comparison of active-alert hypnotic induction with traditional relaxation induction. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 218–224. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.85.2.218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, J. (1991). The locksmith model: Accessing hypnotic responsiveness. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 240–274). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1999). Hypnosis: A mature view. Contemporary Hypnosis, 16, 123–127. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1557-0711
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. (Producer & Writer). (1982). Hypnosis: Can your mind control pain? [Motion picture]. London, UK: BBC.
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, S.-J., Oakley, D. A., & Frith, C. D. (2003). Delusions of control in the normal brain. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1058–1067. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00313-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonshtein, U. (2012). Relational hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(4), 397–415. doi:10.1080/00207144.2012.700613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyer, P., & Lienard, P. (2006). Why ritualized behavior? Precaution systems and action parsing in developmental, pathological and cultural rituals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(6), 595–613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braffman, W., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Imaginative suggestibility and hypnotizability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 578–587. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.578
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., Jonsson, P., Terhune, D. B., & Marcusson-Clavertz, D. (2013). The neurophenomenology of neutral hypnosis. Cortex, 49, 375–385. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comey, G., & Kirsch, I. (1999). Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The phenomenology of hypnotic responding. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 474, 65–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deeley, Q., Oakley, D. A., Toone, B., Giampietro, V., Brammer, M. J., Williams, S. C. R., & Halligan, P. W. (2012). Modulating the default mode network using hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60, 206–228. doi:10.1080/00207144.2012.648070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derbyshire, S. W. G., Whalley, M. G., Stenger, V. A., & Oakley, D. A. (2004). Cerebral activation during hypnotically induced and imagined pain. NeuroImage, 23, 392–401. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, M. J. (1987). The interactional basis of hypnotic experience: On the relational dimensions of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 35, 95–115. doi:10.1080/00207148708416046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkins, G. A., Barabasz, A. F., Council, J. R., & Spiegel, D. (2015). Advancing research and practice: The revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 378–385. doi:10.1080/00029157.2015.1011465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., Kallio, S., & Revonsuo, A. (2007). Cortex functional connectivity as a neurophysiological correlate of hypnosis: An EEG case study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1452–1462. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.11.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galea, V., Woody, E. Z., Szechtman, H., & Pierrynowski, M. R. (2010). Motion in response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity: A window on underlying mechanisms. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 58(3), 251–268. doi:10.1080/00207141003760561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Barrett, D., & Montgomery, G. H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 259–264. doi:10.1080/00207140590961321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, J. (1958). An interactional explanation of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 1, 41–57. doi:10.1080/00029157.1958.10734336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hargadon, R., Bowers, K. S., & Woody, E. Z. (1995). Does counter-pain imagery mediate hypnotic analgesia? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 508–516. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.104.3.508
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamieson, G. A., & Burgess, A. P. (2014). Hypnotic induction is followed by state-like changes in the organization of EEG functional connectivity in the theta and beta frequency bands in high-hypnotically susceptible individuals. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8:528. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00528
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, D. J. (1996). Contemporary interpersonal theory and research: Personality, psychopathology, and psychotherapy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2008). The domain of hypnosis, revisited. In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 21–52). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kihlstrom, J. F. (2013). Neuro-hypnotism: Prospects for hypnosis and neuroscience. Cortex, 49, 365–374. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Council, J. R. (1992). Situational and personality correlates of hypnotic responsiveness. In E. Fromm & M. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 267–291). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846–858. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.10.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lankton, S. R., & Matthews, W. J. (2010). An Ericksonian model of clinical hypnosis. In S. J. Lynn, J. W. Rhue, & I. Kirsch (Eds.), Handbook of clinical hypnosis (2nd ed., pp. 209–237). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leary, T. (1957). Interpersonal diagnosis of personality: A functional theory and methodology for personality evaluation. New York, NY: Ronald Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Kirsch, I. (2006). Essentials of clinical hypnosis: An evidence-based approach. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Neufeld, V., & Maré, C. (1993). Direct versus indirect suggestions: A conceptual and methodological review. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 41, 124–152. doi:10.1080/00207149308414543
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., & Sivec, H. (1992). The hypnotizable subject as creative problem solving agent. In E. Fromm & M. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 292–333). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Maquet, P., Faymonville, E., Degueldre, C., Delfiore, G., Franck, G., Luxen, A., & Lamy, M. (1999). Functional neuroanatomy of hypnotic state. Biological Psychiatry, 45, 327–333. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(97)00546-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., McGeown, W. J., & Kirsch, I. (2013). Neuroimaging resolution of the altered state hypothesis. Cortex, 49, 400–410. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.08.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., & Barnier, A. J. (2004). The highly hypnotizable person: Unity and diversity in behaviour and experience. In M. Heap, R. Brown, & D. Oakley (Eds.), High hypnotisability: Theoretical, experimental and clinical issues (pp. 61–84). London, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M., Glisky, M. L., & Kihlstrom, J. F. (1989). Individual differences among hypnotic virtuosos: A case comparison. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 17, 131–140.
   Google Scholar
• McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Vannucci, M., & Venneri, A. (2015). Structural and functional correlates of hypnotic depth and suggestibility. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 231, 151–159. doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.11.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown, W. J., Mazzoni, G., Venneri, A., & Kirsch, I. (2009). Hypnotic induction decreases anterior default mode activity. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 848–855. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, M. R. (2005). The importance of being earnest when crafting definitions: Science and scientism are not the same thing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53(3), 265–280. doi:10.1080/00207140590961934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2002). Operationalizing “trance” I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43, 107–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010a). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter, N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010b). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: II. Assessment via the PCI-HAP. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 287–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raij, T. T., Numminen, J., Närvänen, S., Hittunen, J., & Hari, R. (2005). Brain correlates of subjective reality of physically and psychologically induced pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 2147–2151. doi:10.1073/pnas.0409542102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Bushnell, M. C., Duncan, G. H., & Price, D. (2002). Hypnosis modulates activity in brain structures involved in the regulation of consciousness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14, 887–901. doi:10.1162/089892902760191117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rainville, P., Hofbauer, R. K., Paus, T., Duncan, G. H., Bushnell, M. C., & Price, D. D. (1999). Cerebral mechanisms of hypnotic induction and suggestion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 110–125. doi:10.1162/089892999563175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R. (1963). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: The experimenter’s hypothesis as unintended determinant of experimental results. American Scientist, 51(2), 268–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, P., Ethier, N., & Woody, E. (2011). Interpersonal complementarity. In L. M. Horowitz & S. N. Strack (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychology: Theory, research, assessment, and therapeutic interventions (pp. 123–142). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). The Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skiba, A. H. (1983). The comparative efficacy of traditional hypnotic and rapid induction analgesia. Unpublished manuscript, Hofstra University, Hempstead, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K. S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginal appears real: A PET study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 1956–1960. doi:10.1073/pnas.95.4.1956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasso, A. F., & Pérez, N. A. (2008). Parsing everyday suggestibility: What does it tell us about hypnosis? In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 283–309). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010). Differential patterns of spontaneous phenomenological response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1140–1150. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., Cardeña, E., & Lindgren, M. (2011). Differential frontal-parietal phase synchrony during hypnosis as a function of hypnotic suggestibility. Psychophysiology, 48, 1444–1447. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01211.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, K. M., Hopwood, C. J., Woody, E., Ethier, N., & Sadler, P. (2014). Momentary assessment of interpersonal process in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 61(1), 1–14. doi:10.1037/a0034277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, K., Bányai, É. I., Józsa, E., & Gősi-Greguss, A. C. (2008). Interactional phenomena of maternal and paternal hypnosis styles. Contemporary Hypnosis, 25(1), 14–28. doi:10.1002/ch.347
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1974). When is an “instruction” an instruction? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 258–269. doi:10.1080/00207147408413005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 130–146. doi:10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winkel, J. D., Younger, J. W., Tomcik, N., Borckardt, J. J., & Nash, M. R. (2006). Anatomy of a hypnotic response: Self-report estimates, actual behavior, and physiological response to the hypnotic suggestion of arm rigidity. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 54, 186–205. doi:10.1080/00207140500528430
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E., & Sadler, P. (2005). Some polite applause for the 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 48, 99–106. doi:10.1080/00029157.2005.10401502
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E., & Szechtman, H. (2003). How can brain activity and hypnosis inform each other? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51, 232–255. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.3.232.15521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Barnier, A. J. (2008). Hypnosis scales for the twenty-first century: What do we need and how should we use them? In M. R. Nash & A. J. Barnier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypnosis (pp. 255–281). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17, 200–211. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., Bowers, K. S., & Oakman, J. M. (1992). A conceptual analysis of hypnotic responsiveness: Experience, individual differences, and context. In E. Fromm & M. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 3–33). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Zamansky, H. S. (1977). Suggestion and countersuggestion in hypnotic behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86, 346–351. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.86.4.346
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zamansky, H. S., & Clark, L. E. (1986). Cognitive competition and hypnotic behavior: Whither absorption? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 205–214. doi:10.1080/00207148608406986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar