A Comparison of Hypnotic Induction, Task Motivation, and a “Cold Start” Control Group on Hypnotizability

References

• Barber, T. X. (1956). Comparison of suggestibility during “light sleep” and hypnosis. Science, 31, 405. doi:10.1126/science.124.3218.405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1958). The concept of hypnosis. The Journal of Psychology, 45, 115–131. doi:10.1080/00223980.1958.9916245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1960). The necessary and sufficient conditions for hypnotic behavior. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 3, 31–42. doi:10.1080/00029157.1960.10404345
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (1965). Measuring “hypnotic-like” suggestibility with and without “hypnotic induction”; Psychometric properties, norms, and variables influencing response to the Barber Suggestibility Scale (BSS). Psychological Reports, 16, 809–844. doi:10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3.809
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X. (2000). A deeper understanding of hypnosis: Its secrets, its nature, its essence. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 42, 208–273. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10734361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1962). “Hypnotic motivation” as a function of task motivation. Journal of Psychology, 54, 363–389. doi:10.1080/00223980.1962.9713126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1963a). “Hypnotic-like” suggestibility in children and adults. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 589–597. doi:10.1037/h0041709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1963b). The relative effectiveness of task-motivating instructions and trance-induction procedure in the production of “hypnotic-like” behaviors. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 137, 107–116. doi:10.1097/00005053-196308000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1963c). Toward a theory of hypnotic behavior: Effects on suggestibility of task motivating instructions and attitudes toward hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 557–565. doi:10.1037/h0047040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1965a). Empirical evidence for a theory of hypnotic behavior: Effects on suggestibility of five variables typically included in hypnotic induction procedures. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 29, 98–107. doi:10.1037/h0021932
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1965b). Empirical evidence for a theory of hypnotic behavior: The suggestibility-enhancing effects of motivational suggestions, relaxation-sleep suggestions, and suggestions that the s will be effectively “hypnotized.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 256–270. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1965.tb01385.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1969). Multidimensional analysis of “hypnotic behavior.” Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 74, 209–220. doi:10.1037/h0027114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & De Moor, W. (1972). A theory of hypnotic induction procedures. The American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 15, 112–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.1972.10402228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Glass, L. B. (1962). Significant factors in hypnotic behavior. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, 222–228. doi:10.1037/h0041347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Wilson, S. C. (1977). Hypnotic suggestions and altered states of consciousness. Experimental evaluation of the new cognitive-behavioral theory and the traditional trance state theory of “hypnosis.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 296, 34–74. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb38159.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barber, T. X., & Wilson, S. C. (1978). The Barber Suggestibility Scale and the Creative Imagination Scale: Experimental and clinical applications. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 84–108. doi:10.1080/00029157.1978.10403966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. (1990). Deep trance subjects: A schema of two distinct subgroups. In R. G. Kunzendorf (Ed.), Mental imagery (pp. 101–112). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cardeña, E., & Terhune, D. B. (2014). Hypnotizability, personality traits, and the propensity to experience alterations of consciousness. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 292–307.
   Google Scholar
• Charlesworth, E. A., & Doughtie, E. B. (1982). Modification of baseline by differential task presentation as either hypnosis or “learned” relaxation. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 55, 1131–1137. doi:10.2466/pms.1982.55.3f.1131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., & Hafner, L. P. (1986). Expectancy versus absorption in the prediction of hypnotic responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 182–189. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council, J. R., Kirsch, I., Vickery, A. R., & Carlson, D. (1983). “Trance” vs “skill” hypnotic inductions: The effects of credibility, expectancy, and experimenter modeling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 432–440. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.51.3.432
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, L. W., & Husband, R. E. (1931). A study of hypnotic susceptibility in relation to personality traits. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 26, 175–182. doi:10.1037/h0074985
   Google Scholar
• Field, P. B. (1965). An inventory scale of hypnotic depth. The International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 13, 238–249. doi:10.1080/00207146508412946
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forbes, E. J., & Pekala, R. J. (1996). Types of hypnotically (un)susceptible individuals as a function of phenomenological experience. Australian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 24, 92–108.
   Google Scholar
• Gandhi, B., & Oakley, D. A. (2005). Does ‘hypnosis’ by any other name smell as sweet? The efficacy of ‘hypnotic inductions depends on the label ‘hypnosis’. Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 304–315. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2004.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass, L. B., & Barber, T. X. (1961). A note on hypnotic behavior, the definition of the situation and the placebo effect. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 132, 539–541. doi:10.1097/00005053-196106000-00009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap, M., Alden, P., Brown, R. J., Naish, P., Oakley, D. A., Wagstaff, G., & Walker, L. G. (2001). The nature of hypnosis: A report prepared by a working party at the request of The Professional Affairs Board of The British Psychological Society. Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R., & Tart, C. T. (1966). Responsiveness to suggestions following waking and imagination instructions and following induction of hypnosis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 196–208. doi:10.1037/h0023323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1991). The social learning theory of hypnosis. In S. Jay Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Theories of hypnosis: Current models and perspectives (pp. 439–465). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I. (1994). Clinical hypnosis as a nondeceptive placebo: Empirically derived techniques. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 37, 95–106. doi: 10.1080/00029157.1994.10403122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1995). The altered state of hypnosis: Changes in the theoretical landscape. American Psychologist, 50, 846–858. doi:10.1037/003-066X.50.846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J. R., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57, 314–329. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.976783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Vanderhoff, H., Shindler, K., & Stafford, J. (2002). Defining hypnosis as a trance vs. cooperation: Hypnotic induction, suggestibility, and performance standards. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 44, 231–240. doi:10.1080/00029157.2002.10403483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapp, M. (1997). Hypnotizability scales: What are they, and are they useful? The Australian Journal of Clinical Hypnotherapy and Hypnosis, 17, 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., Radtke, H. L., Hodgins, D. C., Stam, H. J., & Bertrand, L. D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 523–535. doi:10.2466/pr0.1983.53.2.523
   Google Scholar
• Stanton, H. E. (1975). Is hypnotic induction really necessary? A study of ego-enhancing suggestions and their effects. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 26, 330–336. doi:10.1159/000286949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terhune, D. B., & Cardeña, E. (2010). Differential patterns of spontaneous-experiential response to a hypnotic induction: A latent profile analysis. Consciousness and Cognition, 19, 1140–1150. doi:19:1016/j.concog.2010.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scales, Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scales, Forms C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Sjoberg, B. M. (1961). Suggestibility with and without “induction of hypnosis”. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 132, 204–220. doi:10.1097/00005053-196103000-00002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickless, C., & Kirsch, I. (1989). The effects of verbal and experimental expectancy manipulations on hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 762–768. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar