Volitional and Nonvolitional Responses to Hypnotic Suggestions: Predictors and Subjective Experience

References

• Barber, T. X., & Calverley, D. S. (1966). Toward a theory of hypnotic behavior: Experimental evaluation of Hull’s postulate that hypnotic susceptibility is a habit phenomenon. Journal of Personality, 34(3), 416–433. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1966.tb01724.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. M., Lynn, S. J., & Pekala, R. J. (2009). Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: Individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Consciousness and Cognition, 18, 255–265. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.07.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnier, A. J., Cox, R. E., & McConkey, K. M. (2014). The province of “highs”: The highly hypnotizable person in the science of hypnosis and in psychological science. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice, 1(2), 168–183.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, B. L. (1992). The effect of demands for honesty on the efficacy of the Carleton Skills Training Program. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 40, 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, B. L. & Brigham, T. A. (1990). Modifying hypnotizability with the Carleton Skills Training Program: A partial replication and analysis of components. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 39, 227–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, K. S. (1981). Do the stanford scales tap the classic suggestion effect? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 42–53. doi:10.1080/00207148108409142
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowers, P. (1982). The classic suggestion effect: Relationships with scales of hypnotizability, effortless experiencing, and imagery vividness. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 30, 270–279. doi:10.1080/00207148208407264
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, P. F., & Ramos, P. (2012). Involuntary experiencing and the performance of hypnotic test suggestions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 60(4), 416–431. doi:10.1080/00207144.2012.701090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dienes, Z., & Perner, J. (2007). Executive control without conscious awareness: The cold control theory of hypnosis. In G. A. Jamieson (Ed.), Hypnosis and conscious states: The cognitive neuroscience perspective (pp. 293–314). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farthing, G. W., Venturino, M., & Brown, S. W. (1983). Relationship between two different types of imagery vividness questionnaire items and three hypnotic susceptibility scale factors: A brief communication. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 31, 8–13. doi:10.1080/00207148308407176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorassini, D. R. & Spanos, N. P. (1986) A social cognitive skills approach to the successful modification of hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1004–1012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1965). Hypnotic susceptibility. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgard, E. R. (1986). Divided consciousness: Multiple controls in human thought and action (expanded ed.). New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Council, J. R., & Wickless, C. (1990). Subjective scoring for the harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 38, 112–124. doi:10.1080/00207149008414506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., & Lynn, S. J. (1997). Hypnotic involuntariness and the automaticity of everyday life. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 40, 329–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, V. K., Marcano, G., & Pekala, R. J. (1996). Behavioral and subjective scoring of the harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Further data and an extension. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 38, 191–199. doi:10.1080/00029157.1996.10403337
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn, S. J., Laurence, J., & Kirsch, I. (2015). Hypnosis, suggestion, and suggestibility: An integrative model. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 314–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey, K. M. (1986). Opinions about hypnosis and self-hypnosis before and after hypnotic testing. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34(3), 311–319. doi:10.1080/00207148608406996
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey K. M., Wende V., & Barnier A. J. (1999). Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47(1), 23–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohl, J. C. (2008). Desire to be hypnotized: Intrinsic vs. extrinsic motivation ( Master’s thesis). West Chester University of Pennsylvania, West Chester, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Mohl, J. C. (2012). Seeing the future by looking at the past: Comment on Kirsch et al. Contemporary Hypnosis and Integrative Therapy, 29(2), 169–174.
   Google Scholar
• Mohl, J. C., Finigan, D. M., & Scharff, L. M. (2016). The effect of a suggestion to generate interest in a reading in highly hypnotizable people: A promising use in education. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 64(2), 239–260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J. (1991). The phenomenology of consciousness inventory. West Chester, PA: Mid-Atlantic Educational Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1984). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility by a self‑report phenomenological state instrument. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 27, 114–121. doi:10.1080/00029157.1984.10402867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (1987). Predicting hypnotic susceptibility via a self-report instrument: A replication. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 30, 57–65. doi:10.1080/00029157.1987.10402723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Kumar, V. K. (2000). Operationalizing “trance”. I: Rationale and research using a psychophenomenological approach. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 43, 107–135. doi:10.1080/00029157.2000.10404265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., Kumar, V. K., Maurer, R., Elliott-Carter N., Moon, E., & Mullen, K. (2010). Suggestibility, expectancy, trance state effects, and hypnotic depth: I. Implications for understanding hypnotism. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 52, 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Mauer, R. L. (2013). A cross-validation of two differing measures of hypnotic depth. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 61 (1), 81–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekala, R. J., & Nagler, R. (1989). The assessment of hypnoidal states: Rationale and clinical application. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 31, 231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan, P. W. & McConkey, K. M. (1982). Hypnosis and experience: The exploration of phenomena and process. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Sheehan P.W., McConkey K.M. & Cross D. (1978). Experiential analysis of hypnosis: Some new observations on hypnotic phenomena. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(5), 570–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1963). Norms on the harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility, form A. International Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hypnosis, 11(1), 39–47. doi:10.1080/00207146308409226
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spanos, N. P., & Barber, T. X. (1972). Cognitive activity during “hypnotic” suggestibility: Goal-directed fantasy and the experience of nonvolition. Journal of Personality, 40(3), 510–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spanos N. P., Radtke H. L., Hodgins D. C., Stam H. J., & Bertrand L. D. (1983). The Carleton University Responsiveness to Suggestion Scale: Normative data and psychometric properties. Psychological Reports, 53(2), 523–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H. (1980). Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 245–251. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.87.2.245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G.F. (1981). Hypnosis, compliance, and belief. New York, NY: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagstaff, G. F. (2004). High hypnotizability in a sociocognitive framework. In M. Heap, D. Oakley, & R. Brown (Eds.), The highly hypnotizable person (pp. 85–114). London, UK: Brunner-Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1974). When is an instruction an instruction? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 258–269. doi:10.1080/00207147408413005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 130–146. doi:10.1080/00029157.1980.10403217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scales, forms A & B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1962). Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale, form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera II, I. E. (2007). Empathic features of absorption and incongruence. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 50, 59–69. doi:10.1080/00029157.2007.10401598
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera, I. E. (2015). Mysteries of hypnosis and the self are revealed by the psychology and neuroscience of empathy. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 57(3), 330–348. doi:10.1080/00029157.2014.978495
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickramasekera, II, I. E., & Szlyk, J. (2003). Could empathy be a predictor of hypnotic ability? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 51(4), 390–399. doi:10.1076/iceh.51.4.390.16413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., Barnier, A. J., & McConkey, K. M. (2005). Multiple hypnotizabilities: Differentiating the building blocks of hypnotic response. Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 200–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woody, E. Z., & Bowers, K. S. (1994). A frontal assault on dissociated control. In S. J. Lynn & J. W. Rhue (Eds.), Dissociation: Clinical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 52–79). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Younger, J., Kemmerer, D. D., Winkel, J. D., & Nash, M. R. (2005). The harvard group scale of hypnotic susceptibility: Accuracy of self-report and the memory for items. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 306–320. doi:10.1080/00207140590961411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar