15
Views
11
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Click-Evoked Human Electrocochleogram. Noninvasive Recording Method, Origin and Physiologic Significance

, , , &
Pages 151-174 | Published online: 10 Feb 2015

  • Adrian, E. D. (1931): The microphonic action of the cochlea: An interpretation of Wever and Bray's experiments. J. Physiol. (Lond.), (Proc. Physiol. Soc.), 71:xxviii–xxix.
  • Adrian, E. D., Bronk, D. W. and Phillips, G. (1931): The nervous origin of the Wever and Bray effect. J. Physiol. (Lond.), (Proc. Physiol. Soc.), 73:2P–3P.
  • Antoli-Candela, F. Jr. and Kiang, N. Y. S. (1978): Unit activity underlying the N1 potential. In: Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, Naunton, R. F. and Fernández, C. (Eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 165–189.
  • Békésy, G. von (1952): Gross localization of the place of origin of the cochlear microphonics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 24:399–409.
  • Békésy, G. von (1960): Experiments in Hearing. Wever, E. G. (Transl. and Ed.), McGraw-Hill, New York, 745p.
  • Berlin, C. I. and Gondra, M. I. (1976): Extratympanic clinical electrocochleography with clicks. In: Electrocochleography, Ruben, R. J., Elberling, C. and Salomon, G. (Eds.), University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 457–469.
  • Buytendijk, F. J. J. (1910): On the negative variation of the nervous acusticus caused by a sound. Proc. R. Soc. Amsterdam, 13:649–652.
  • Cann, J. and Knott, J. (1979): Polarity of acoustic click stimuli for eliciting brainstem auditory evoked responses: a proposed standard. Am. J. EEG Technol., 19:125–132.
  • Coats, A. C. (1974): On electrocochleographic electrode design. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 56:708–711.
  • Coats, A. C. (1976): Evaluation of “click pips” as impulsive yet frequency-specific stimuli for possible use in electrocochleography: a preliminary report. In: Electrocochleography, Ruben, R. J., Elberling, C. and Salomon, G. (Eds.), University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 387–406.
  • Coats, A. C. (1978): Human auditory nerve action potentials and brainstem evoked responses. Latency-intensity functions in detection of cochlear and retrocochlear pathology. Arch. Otolaryngol., 104:709–717.
  • Coats, A. C. (1981a): The summating potential and Meniere disease. I. Summating potential amplitude in Meniere and non-Meniere ears. Arch. Otolaryngol., 107:199–208.
  • Coats, A. C. (1981b): Meniere disease and the summating potential. II Vestibular test results. Arch. Otolaryngol., 197:263–270.
  • Coats, A. C. and Alford, B. R. (1981): Ménière disease and the summating potential. III. Effect of glycerol administration. Arch. Otolaryngol., 107:469–473.
  • Coats, A. C. and Dickey, J. R. (1970): Nonsurgical recording of human auditory nerve action potentials and cochlear michrophonics. Ann. Otol Rhinol. Laryngol., 79:844–852.
  • Coats, A. C. and Jerger, J. F. (1979): Practicum manual. Auditory Evoked Potential Course, The Neurosensory Center of Houston, Houston, 34p.
  • Coats, A. C. and Jerger, J. (1980): Auditory evoked potentials. Course Syllabus. The Neurosensory Center of Houston, Houston, 126p.
  • Coats, A. C. and Martin, J. L. (1977): Human auditory nerve action potentials and brain stem evoked responses. Effects of audiogram shape and lesion location. Arch. Otolaryngol., 103:605–622.
  • Coats, A. C., Martin, J. L. and Kidder, H. R. (1979): Normal short-latency electrophysiological filtered click responses recorded from vertex and external auditory meatus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 65:747–758.
  • Cullen, J. K., Ellis, M. S., Berlin, C. I. and Lousteau, R. J. (1972): Human acoustic nerve action potential recordings from the tympanic membrane without anesthesia. Acta Otolaryngol. 74:15–22.
  • Dallos, P. (1973a): The auditory periphery. Biophysics and physiology. Academic Press, New York, 548p.
  • Dallos, P. (1973b): Cochlear potential and cochlear mechanics. In: Møller, A. R. (Ed.), Basic Mechanisms in Hearing, Academic Press, New York, pp. 335–372.
  • Dallos, P. and Cheatham, M. A. (1976): Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 60:510–512.
  • Dallos, P. and Santos-Sacchi, J. (1982): Intracellular recordings from cochlear outer cells. Abstracts of the Fifth Midwinter Research Meeting, Association for Research in Otolaryngology, St. Petersburg Beach, Florida, pp. 7–8.
  • Dallos, P., Schoeny, G. and Cheatham, M. A. (1972): Cochlear summating potentials. Descriptive aspects. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 302, 46p.
  • Davis, H. (1954): Mechanism of hearing. In: Transactions of the Fourth Conference, Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, Nachmansohn, D. (Ed.), Nerve Impulse. Progress Associates, Caldwell, pp. 58–139.
  • Davis, H. (1957a): Biophysics and physiology of the inner ear. Physiol. Rev., 37:1–49.
  • Davis, H. (1957b): Initiation of nerve impulses in cochlea and other mechanoreceptors. In: Bullock, T. H. (Ed.), Physiological Triggers and Discontinuous Rate Processes, American Physiological Society, Washington, pp. 60–71.
  • Davis, H. (1958): Transmission and transduction in the cochlea. Laryngoscope, 68:359–382.
  • Davis, H. (1959): Excitation of auditory receptors. In: Section 1: Neurophysiology, Vol. I, Field, J. (Ed.), Handbook of Physiology, American Physiological Society, Washington, pp. 565–584.
  • Davis, H. (1960): Mechanism of excitation of auditory nerve impulses. In: Rasmussen, G. L. and Windle, W. F. (Eds.), Neural Mechanisms of the Auditory and Vestibular Systems, Springfield, pp. 21–39.
  • Davis, H. (1961): Some principles of sensory receptor action. Physiol. Rev., 41:391–416.
  • Davis, H. (1965): A model for transducer action in the cochlea. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 30:181–190.
  • Davis, H. (1968): Mechanisms of the inner ear. Ann. Otol. Rhin. Laryngol., 77:644–656.
  • Davis, H., Deatherage, B. H., Eldredge, D. H. and Smith, C. A. (1958): Summating potentials of the cochlea. Am. J. Physiol., 195:251–261.
  • Davis, H., Deatherage, B. H., Rosenblut, B., Fernández, C., Kimura, R. and Smith, C. A. (1958b): Modification of cochlear potentials produced by streptomycin poisoning and extensive venous obstruction. Laryngoscope, 68:596–627.
  • Davis, H., Derbyshire, A. J., Lurie, M. H. and Saul, L. J. (1934): The electric response of the cochlea. Am. J. Physiol., 107:311–332.
  • Davis, H., Fernández, C. and McAuliffe, D. R. (1950): The excitatory process in the cochlea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 36:580–587.
  • Davis, H., Tasaki, I., and Goldstein, R. (1952): The peripheral origin of activity, with reference to the ear. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 17:143–154.
  • Derbyshire, A. J. and Davis, H. (1935): The action potentials of the auditory nerve. Am. J. Physiol., 113:476–504.
  • Eggermont, J. J. and Odenthal, D. W. (1974a); Methods in electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl. 316:16–24.
  • Eggermont, J. J. and Odenthal, D. W. (1974b): Action potentials and summating potentials in the normal human cochlea. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl. 316:39–61.
  • Elberling, C. (1976): Simulation of cochlear action potentials recorded from the ear canal in man. In: Electrocochleography, University Park Press, Baltimore, pp. 151–168.
  • Fernández, C., Butler, R., Konishi, T. and Honrubia, V. (1962): Cochlear potentials in the rhesus and squirrel monkey. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34:1411–1417.
  • Fex, J. (1974): Neural excitatory processes of the inner ear. In: Neff, W. D. (Ed.), Handbook of Sensory Physiology. Vol. V/1, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 585–646.
  • Flach, M. and Seidel, P. (1968): Mikrophonpotentiale (MP) des menschlichen Ohres. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilk. 190:229–243.
  • Furukawa, T., Hayashida, Y. and Matsuura, S. (1978): Quantal analysis of the size of excitatory post-synaptic potentials at synapses between hair cells and afferent nerve fibers in goldfish. J. Physiol., 276:211–226.
  • Furukawa, T. and Ishii, Y. (1967): Neurophysiological studies on hearing in goldfish. J. Neurophysiol., 30:1377–1403.
  • Furukawa, T. and Matsuura, S. (1978): Adaptive rundown of excitatory post-synaptic potentials at synapses between hair cells and eighth nerve fibers in the goldfish. J. Physiol., 276:193–209.
  • Furukawa, T. and Matsuura, S. (1981): Adaptation and dynamic response occurring at hair cell-afferent fiber synapse. In: Syka, J. and Aitkin, L. (Eds.), Neuronal mechanisms of hearing, Plenium Press. New York, pp. 37–41.
  • Gavilan, C. and Sanjuan, J. (1964): Microphonic potential picked up from the human tympanic membrane. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 73:101–109.
  • Gibson, W. P. R. and Beagley, H. A. (1976): Trans-tympanic electrocochleography in the investigation of retro-cochlear disorders. Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol., Suppl. 97:507–516.
  • Goldstein, R. (1954): Analysis of summating potential in cochlear responses of guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol., 178:331–337.
  • Honrubia, V. and Ward, P. H. (1969): Properties of the summating potential of the guinea pig's cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 45:1443–1450.
  • Humphries, K. N., Ashcroft, P. B. and Douek, E. E. (1977): Extratympanic electrocochleography. Acta Otolaryngol., 83:303–309.
  • Jewett, D. L. and Williston, J. S. (1971): Auditory evoked farfields averaged from the scalp of humans. Brain, 94:681–696.
  • Kiang, N. Y.-S. and Peake, W. T. (1960): Components of electrical responses recorded from the cochlea. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 69:448–458.
  • Kohllöffel, L. U. E. (1971): Studies of the distribution of cochlear potentials along the basilar membrane. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 288:1–66.
  • Konishi, T. and Yasuno, T. (1963): Summating potential of the cochlea in the guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 35:1448–1452.
  • Kupperman, R. (1966): The dynamic DC potential in the cochlea of guinea pig (summating potential). Acta Otolaryngol. 62:465–480.
  • Lang, A. H. and Happonen, J. M. (1981): An improved technique for recording the brainstem auditory evoked response (BSERs), Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol., 52:S9 (Abstract).
  • Lempert, J., Meltzer, P. E., Wever, E. G. and Lawrence, M. (1950): The cochleogram and its clinical application. Arch. Otolaryngol., 51:307–311.
  • Lurie, M. H., Davis, H. and Derbyshire, A. J. (1934): The electrical activity of the cochlea in certain pathological conditions. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 43:321–343.
  • Martin, J. L. (1976): Short latency auditory-evoked potentials in humans. Doctoral Dissertation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, 345p.
  • Montandon, P. B., Megill, N. D., Kahn, A. R., Peake, W. T. and Kiang, N. Y. S. (1975): Recording auditory-nerve potentials as an office procedure. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 84:2–10.
  • Mori, N., Matsunaga, T., Asai, H. and Matusnaga, T. (1978): Extratympanic electrococh-leography using silver ball electrodes. Audiology (Japan), 21:653–659.
  • Niaussat, M. M. and Legouix, M. J. P. (1967): Anomalies des réponses microphoniques cochléaires dans une lignée de souris présentant des crises convulsives au son. C. R. Acad. Sci., 264:103–105.
  • Peake, W. T., Goldstein, M. H., Jr. and Kiang, N. Y. S. (1962): Response of the auditory nerve to repetitive acoustic stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34:562–570.
  • Pestalozza, G. and Davis, H. (1956): Electric responses of the guinea pig ear to high audio frequencies. Am. J. Physiol., 185:595–600.
  • Picton, T. W., Stapells, D. R. and Campbell, K. B. (1981): Auditory evoked potentials from the human cochlea and brainstem. J. Otolaryngol., 10, Supp. 9:1–41.
  • Portmann, M., Darrouzet, J. and Niaussat, M. M. (1971): L'organe de Corti chez la souris swiss/RB. Audiology, 10:298–314.
  • Portmann, M., Le Bert, G. and Aran, J.-M. (1967): Potentiels cochléaires obtenus chez l'homme en dehors de toute intervention chirurgicale. Note Préliminaire. Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol., 88:157–164.
  • Rosenblith, W. A. (1954): Electrical responses from the auditory nervous system. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 63:839–860.
  • Ruben, R. J. (1967): Cochlear potentials as a diagnostic test in deafness. In: Graham, A. B. (Ed.), Sensorineural Hearing Processes and Disorders, Little, Brown and Co., Boston, pp. 313–337.
  • Ruben, R. J., Bordley, J. E. and Lieberman, A. T. (1961): Cochlear potentials in man. Laryngoscope, 71:1141–1164.
  • Ruben, R. J., Knickerbocker, G. G., Sekula, J., Nager, G. T. and Bordley, J. E. (1959): Cochlear microphonics in man. A preliminary report. Laryngoscope, 69:665–671.
  • Ruben, R. J., Lieberman, A. T. and Bordley, J. E. (1962): Some observations on cochlear potentials and nerve action potentials in children. Laryngoscope, 72:545–554.
  • Ruben, R. J., Sekula, J., Bordley, J. E., Knickerbocker, G. G., Nager, F. T. and Fisch, U. (1960): Human cochlea responses to sound stimuli. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 69:459–479.
  • Russell, I. J. and Sellick, P. M. (1981): The responses of hair cells to low frequency tones and their relationship to the extra-cellular receptor potentials and sound pressure level in the guinea pig cochlea. In: Syka, J. and Aitkin, L. (Eds.), Neuronal Mechanisms of Hearing, Plenium Press, New York, pp. 3–15.
  • Salomon, G. and Elberling, C. (1971): Cochlear nerve potentials recorded from the ear canal in man. Acta Otolaryngol., 71:319–325.
  • Sand, O., Ozawa, S. and Hagiwara, S. (1975): Electrical and mechanical stimulation of hair cells in the mudpuppy. J. Comp. Physiol., 102:13–26.
  • Sellick, P. M. and Russell, I. J. (1978): intracellular studies of cochlear hair cells; filling the gap between basilar membrane mechanics and neural excitation. In: Naunton, R. F. and Fernández, C. (Eds.), Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, Academic Press, New York, pp. 113–139.
  • Sohmer, H. and Feinmesser, M. (1967): Cochlear action potentials recorded from the external ear in man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 76:427–436.
  • Spoendlin, H. H. (1971): Degeneration behavior of the cochlear nerve. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilk. 200:275–291.
  • Spreng, M. and Keidel, W. D. (1967): Separierung von Cerebroaudiogram (CAG), Neuro-audiogramm (NAG) und Otoaudiogramm (OAG) in der objectiven Audiometrie. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilk. 189:225–246.
  • Staewen, W. S., Allison, D., Harris, K., Krumholz, A. and Goldstein, P. (1980): Determining acoustic condensation and rarefaction of earphones for brainstem auditory evoked responses. Am. J. EEG Technol., 20:133–138.
  • Stevens, S. S. and Davis, H. (1938): Hearing. Its Psychology and Physiology. J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 489p.
  • Tasaki, I. (1954): Nerve impulses in individual auditory nerve fibers of guinea pig. J. Neurophysiol., 17:97–122.
  • Tasaki, I., Davis, H. and Eldredge, D. H. (1954): Exploration of cochlear potentials in guinea pig with a microelectrode. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 26:765–773.
  • Tasaki, I., Davis, H. and Legouix, J.-P. (1952): The space-time pattern of the cochlear microphonic (guinea pig) as recorded by differential electrodes. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 24:502–519.
  • Tasaki, I. and Fernández, C. (1952): Modification of cochlear microphonics and action potential by KCl solution and by direct currents. J. Neurophysiol., 15:497–512.
  • Teas, D. C., Eldredge, D. H. and Davis, H. (1962): Cochlear responses to acoustic transients: an interpretation of whole-nerve action potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 34:1438–1459.
  • Terkildsen, K., Osterhammel, P. and Huis in't Veld, F. (1975): Far field electrocochleography. Frequency specificity of the response. Scand. Audiol., 4:167–172.
  • Turella, G., Chatrian, G. E., Wirch, A. L. and Snyder, J. M. (To be published): Effects of click frequency on the normal human electrocochleogram.
  • Weiss, T. F., Mulroy, M. J. and Altmann, D. W. (1974): Intracellular responses to acoustic clicks in the inner ear of the alligator lizard. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 55:606–619.
  • Weiss, T. F., Peake, W. T., Ling, A. Jr. and Holton, T. (1978): Which structures determine frequency selectivity and tonotopic organization of vertebrate nerve fibers? Evidence from the alligator lizard. In: Naunton, R. F. and Fernández, C. (Eds.), Evoked Electrical Activity in the Auditory Nervous System, Academic Press, New York, pp. 91–112.
  • Wever, E. G. (1966): Electrical properties of the cochlea. Physiol. Rev., 45:102–127.
  • Wever, E. G. and Bray, C. W. (1930a): Action currents in the auditory nerve in response to acoustical stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 16:344–350.
  • Wever, E. G. and Bray, C. W. (1930b): The nature of acoustic response: The relation between sound frequency and frequency of impulses in the auditory nerve. J. Exp. Psychol., 13:373–387.
  • Wever, E. G. and Bray, C. W. (1930c): Present possibilities for auditory theory. Psychol. Rev., 37:365–380.
  • Yoshie, N. (1968): Auditory nerve action potential responses to clicks in man. Laryngoscope, 78:198–215.
  • Yoshie, N. (1971): Clinical cochlear response audiometry by means of an average response computer: non-surgical technique and clinical use. Rev. Laryngol. Otol. Rhinol. 92, (Supplement): 646–672.
  • Yoshie, N. and Ohashi, T. (1969): Clinical use of cochlear nerve action potential response in man for differential diagnosis of hearing losses. Acta Otolaryngol, Suppl. 252:71–87.
  • Yoshie, N., Ohashi, T. and Susuki, T. (1967): Non-surgical recording of auditory nerve action potentials in man. Laryngoscope, 77:76–85.
  • Yoshie, N. and Yamaura, K. (1969): Cochlear microphonic responses to pure tones in man recorded by a non-surgical method. Acta Otolaryngol., Suppl., 252, 37–69.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.