References
- Appleton, D. R., French, J. M., Vanderpump, M. P. J. (1996). Ignoring a covariate: an example of Simpson’s paradox. Am. Stat. 50(4): 340–341.
- Arah, O. A. (2008). The role of causal reasoning in understanding Simpson’s paradox, Lord’s paradox, and the suppression effect: covariate selection in the analysis of observational studies. Emerg. Themes Epi. 5(5). DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-5-5.
- Heiner, K., Wagon. S., (2015). Simpson’s paradox, Wolfram demonstrations project. demonstra- tions.wolfram.com/SimpsonsParadox
- Pearl, J., Mackenzie, D. (2018). The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect. New York: Basic Books.
- Radelet, M. (1981). Racial characteristics and imposition of the death penalty. Am. Soc. Rev. 46: 918–927. DOI: 10.2307/2095088.
- Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B. 13: 238–241.
- Tu, Y.-K., Gunnell, D. J., Gilthorpe, M. S. (2008). Simpson’s paradox, Lord’s paradox, and the suppression effect are the same phenomenon – the reversal paradox. Emerg. Themes Epi. 5(2). doi.org/10.1186/1742-7622-5-2 DOI: 10.1186/s12982-020-00089-7.
- Wainer, H. (2002). The BK-Plot: making Simpson’s paradox clear to the masses. Chance. 15(3): 60–62.
- Young, A. M. (1983). Recent trends in higher education and labor force activity. Mon. Labor Rev. www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1983/02/rpt2full.pdf
- Yule, G. U. (1903). Notes on the theory of association of attributes in statistics. Biometrika. 2(2): 121–134. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/2.2.121.