A Unique Collaboration: Prominent Statisticians’ Survey Work in Greece in 1946

REFERENCES

• Allied Mission for Observing Greek Elections (AMFOGE) (11 February 1946), “Discussion with 1. Mr. John Mikhalopoulos 2. Mr. Demetrios Calitsounakis 3. Mr. Angelos Angelopoulos.”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (28 February 1946), “Memorandum on Pattern of Observation of the Greek Elections (MEMO BLUE).”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (5 March 1946a), “Sampling Instructions: Selection of Households for Form B Interviews.”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (5 March 1946b), “Instructions to the District Supervisors Regarding the Drawing of Names for Part B of Form C-1.”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (18 March 1946), “Minutes of the Meeting of the Plans Committee Held at the Hotel Grand Bretagne at 3:00 p.m.”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (9 April 1946), “Report of the Planning and Sampling Staff,” AMFOGE Central Office.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, M., and Fienberg, S.E. (1999), “To Sample or not to Sample? The 2000 Census Controversy,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 30, 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulmer, M., Bales, K., and Sklar, K.K. (1991), “The Social Survey in Historical Perspective,” in The Social Survey in Historical Perspective: 1880–1940, eds. M. Bulmer, K. Bales, and K.K. Sklar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, W.G. (1977), Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, G.M. (1957), “Statistical Frontiers,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deming, W.E. (13–15 February 1946), “Map-lists (Precinct 16, St. Luke's Parish; Precinct 7, St. Nicolas’ Parish; Precinct 16, St. Luke's Parish; Precinct 8, St. Nicolas’ Parish).”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1–6 September 1946), “On a Population Sample for Greece.”
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1950), Some Theory of Sampling, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, J.W., and Shelton, W.C. (1978), Revolution in United States Government Statistics: 1926--1976, Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, Office of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1992), “U.S. Government Contributions to Probability Sampling and Statistical Analysis,” Statistical Science, 7, 320–338.
   Google Scholar
• Fernee, H., Stoop, I., and Harrison, E. (2012), “Coding Media Claims in the European Social Survey, Round 6: Background, Guidelines, Coding Scheme and Codebook” European Social Survey. . Available at http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=184&Itemid=80.
   Google Scholar
• Folks, J.L. (1995), “A Conversation With Oscar Kempthorne,” Statistical Science, 10, 321–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grier, D.A. (2005), When Computers Were Human, Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.H. (1987), “Some History and Reminiscences on Survey Sampling,” Statistical Science, 2, 180–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.H., and Hauser, P.M. (1945), “Area Sampling-Some Principles of Sample Design,” The Public Opinion Quarterly, 9, 183–193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.H., and Hurwitz, W.N. (1943), “On the Theory of Sampling From Finite Populations,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 17, 333–362.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M.H., Hurwitz, W.N., and Madow, W.G. (1953), Sample Survey Methods and Theory (Vol. 1), New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harkness, J.A., Villar, A., and Edwards, B. (2010), “Translation, Adaptation, and Design,” in Survey Methods in Multinational, Multiregional, and Multicultural Contexts, eds. J.A. Harkness, M. Braun, B. Edwards, T.P. Johnson, L. Lyberg, P.Ph. Mohler, B.-E. Pennell, and T.W. Smith, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 117–140.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, L. (1947), “Résultats d’un Sondage sur la Population de la Grèce en 1946,” [Results of a Sample Survey on the Population of Greece in 1946], Population, 2, 785–789.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, L. (2000), “The Allied Mission to Observe the Greek Elections,” available at http://www.insigne.org/AMFOGE-I.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, R.J. (1945), “The Master Sample of Agriculture: II, Design,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 46–56.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (16 February 1946), “Report of Survey of Athens to Foy Kohler,” AMFOGE.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1978), Statistical Survey Techniques, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Jessen, R.J., Blythe, R.H., Kempthorne, O., and Deming, W.E. (1947), “On a Population Sample for Greece,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 42, 357–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessen, R.J., Kempthorne, O., Daly, J.F., and Deming, W.E. (1949), “Observations on the 1946 Elections in Greece,” American Sociological Review, 14, 11–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A.J. (1945), “The Master Sample of Agriculture: I, Development and Use,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 40, 38–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kish, L. (1949), “A Procedure for Objective Respondent Selection within the Household,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 380–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1965), Survey Sampling, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, S.L. (2004), “Statistical Frontiers in Survey Sampling,” The American Statistician, 58, 145–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madow, W.G., and Madow, L.H. (1944), “On the Theory of Systematic Sampling,” The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 15, 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, E.S., Maudlin, W.P., and Nisselson, H. (1953), “The Post-Enumeration Survey of the 1950 Census: A Case History in Survey Design,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 48, 220–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavrogordatos, G. (1984), “The 1946 Elections and Plebiscite: Prelude to Civil War,” in Greece in 1940–1950: A Nation in Crisis (in Greek), Athens: Themelio, pp. 307–340.
   Google Scholar
• Michalopoulou, C. (2004), In the Empire of Indications: The History of Sampling Practice in Greece (in Greek), Athens: Papazisis.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, G. (ed.) (2000), IASS Jubilee Commemorative Volume: Landmark Papers in Survey Statistics, International Association of Survey Statisticians, International Statistical Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Neyman, J. (1934), “On Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection” (with discussion), Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 558–625.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1938), “Contribution to the Theory of Sampling Human Populations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 33, 101–116.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (16 February 1946), “Mr. Jessen's Report on Survey in Athens to Foy Kohler,” AMFOGE.
   Google Scholar
• O’Muircheartaigh, C., and Wong, S.T. (1981), “The Impact of Sampling Theory on Survey Sampling Practice: A Review,” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, XLIX, 1, 465–493.
   Google Scholar
• Platt, J. (1991), “Anglo-American Contacts in the Development of Research Methods Before 1945,” in The Social Survey in Historical Perspective: 1880–1940, eds. M. Bulmer, K. Bales, and K.K. Sklar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 340–358.
   Google Scholar
• Rao, J.N. K. (2005), “Interplay Between Sample Survey Theory and Practice: An Appraisal,” Survey Methodology, 31, 117–138.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, C. (1998), NEYMAN (reissued, NEYMAN – from Life, 1982), New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schulte-Nordholt, E. (2005), “Brief Description of the Methodology Plan for the 2011 Census of Population and Housing in the Netherlands,” Statistics Netherlands, Division Social and Spatial Statistics, Dept. Support and Development, Section Research and Development, . available at http://unstats.un.org/unsd/demographic/sources/census/netherlandspdf.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Seng, Y.P. (1951), “Historical Survey of the Development of Sampling Theories and Practice,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 114, 214–231.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, F.F. (1948), “History of the Uses of Modern Sampling Procedures,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 43, 12–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, F.F., and McCarthy, P.J. (1974), Sampling Opinions: An Analysis of Survey Procedure (reprinted, 1st ed. 1958, New York, Wiley), Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, F.F., Deming, W.E., and Hansen, M.H. (1940), “The Sampling Procedure of the 1940 Population Census,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 35, 615–630.
   Google Scholar
• Stoop, I., and Fernee, H. (2010), “Event Data Collection Guidelines for ESS National Coordinators,” European Social Survey, . available at http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=183&Itemid=80.
   Google Scholar
• Sukhatme, P.V. (1954), Sampling Theory of Surveys with Applications, Ames, IA: Iowa State College Press.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1966), “Major Developments in Sampling Theory and Practice,” in Research Papers in Statistics: Festschrift for J. Neyman, ed. F.N. David, New York: Wiley, pp. 367–409.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau (2009), Design and Methodology: American Community Survey, Washington: Government Printing Office, available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/survey_methodology/acs_design_methodology.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of State (1946), “Report of the Allied Mission to Observe the Greek Elections,” Publication number 2522, Washington: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, V., and Gabilondo, L.G. (1993), Family Budget Surveys in the EC: Methodology and Recommendations for Harmonisation (Theme 3, Series E), Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, F. (1946), “A Review of Recent Developments in Sampling and Sampling Surveys” (with discussion), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 109, 12–43.
   Google Scholar
• ——— (1949), Sampling Methods for Censuses and Surveys, London: Griffin.
   Google Scholar