Will the ASA's Efforts to Improve Statistical Practice be Successful? Some Evidence to the Contrary

References

• Bakan, D. (1966), “The Test of Significance in Psychological Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 77, 423–427.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. O., and Sellke, T. (1987), “Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of p Values and Evidence,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 112–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, D. (2017), “A p-Value to Die For,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 895–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briggs, W. M. (2017), “The Substitute for p-Values,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 897–898.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1978), “The Case Against Statistical Significance Testing,” Harvard Educational Review, 48, 378–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1990), “Things I Have Learned (So Far),” American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1994), “The Earth is Round (p <.05),” American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cumming, G. (2014), “The New Statistics: Why and How,” Psychological Science, 25, 7–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelman, A., and Carlin, J. (2017), “Some Natural Solutions to the p-Value Problem—and Why They Won't Work,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 899–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2004), “Mindless Statistics,” Journal of Socio-Economics, 33, 587–606.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., and Murray, D. J. (1987), Cognition as Intuitive Statistics, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J., and Krüger, L. (1989), The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1975), “Consequences of Prejudice Against the Null Hypothesis,” Psychological Bulletin, 82, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagen, R. L. (1997), “In Praise of the Null Hypothesis Statistical Test,” American Psychologist, 52, 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlow, L. L., Mulaik, S. A., and Steiger, J. H. (eds.) (1997), What If There Were No Significance Tests? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. (2016), Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk, R. (1996), “Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2004), Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E. (1983), “Let's Take the Con Out of Econometrics,” American Economic Review, 73, 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1968), “Statistical Significance in Psychological Research,” Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews, R. (2017), “The ASA's p-Value Statement One Year On,” Significance, April, 38–40.
   Google Scholar
• McShane, B. B., and Gal, D. (2017), “Statistical Significance and the Dichotomization of Evidence,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 112, 885–895.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P. E. (1967), “Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox,” Philosophy of Science, 34, 103–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ——— (1978), “Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, D. E., and Henkel, R. E. (eds.) (1970), The Significance Test Controversy: A Reader, Chicago, IL: Aldine.
   Google Scholar
• Nickerson, R. S. (2000), “Null Hypothesis Significance Testing: A Review of an Old and Continuing Controversy,” Psychological Methods, 5, 241–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, M. (1986), Statistical Inference: A Commentary for the Social and Behavioural Sciences, Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Rosnow, R. L., and Rosenthal, R. (1989), “Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science,” American Psychologist, 44, 1276–1284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozeboom, W. W. (1960), “The Fallacy of the Null-Hypothesis Significance Test,” Psychological Bulletin, 57, 416–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, F. L. (1996), “Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for the Training of Researchers,” Psychological Methods, 1, 115–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., and Marks, M. (2015), “Editorial,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1–2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wainer, H. (1999), “One Cheer for Null Hypothesis Significance Testing,” Psychological Methods, 4, 212–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wasserstein, R. L., and Lazar, N. A. (2016), “The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose,” The American Statistician, 70, 129–133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, L., and American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999), “Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations,” American Psychologist, 54, 594–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziliak, S. T., and McCloskey, D. N. (2008), The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar