5,563
Views
7
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Impact of Results Blind Science Publishing on Statistical Consultation and Collaboration

ORCID Icon
Pages 346-351 | Received 01 Feb 2018, Published online: 20 Mar 2019

References

  • Begg, C. B., and Mazumdar, M. (1994), “Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias,” Biometrics, 50, 1088–1101.
  • Cohen, J. (1994), “The World is Round (p < .05),” American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
  • DeCoster, J., Sparks, E. A., Sparks, J. C., Sparks, G. G., and Sparks, C.W. (2015), “Opportunistic Biases: Their Origins, Effects, and an Integrated Solution,” American Psychologist, 70, 499–514.
  • Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., and Minder, C. (1997), “Bias in Meta-Analysis Detected by a Simple Graphical Test,” British Medical Journal, 315, 629–634.
  • Fanelli D. (2010), “Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data,” PLoS ONE, 5, e10271. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010271
  • Hunter, J. E. (1997), “Needed: A Ban on The Significance Test,” Psychological Science, 8, 3–7.
  • Light, R. J., and Pillemer, D. B. (1984). Summing Up: The Science of Reviewing Research, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Locascio, J. J. (1999), “Significance Tests and ‘Results-Blindness,’” American Psychological Association (APA) Monitor, May, 1999, pg. 11.
  • ——— (2011), “A Statistical Suggestion,” Scientific American Magazine, Letters, 305, 8–10.
  • ——— (2015), “Psychology and Statistics: Readers Respond to the BASP Ban on p-Values,” Significance Magazine, 12, 35–36.
  • ——— (2017a), “Results Blind Science Publishing,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 239–246.
  • ——— (2017b), “Rejoinder to Responses to ‘Results Blind Publishing’,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39, 258–261.
  • Open Science Collaboration (2015), “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science,” Science, 349, 943.
  • Rosenthal, R. (1979), “The ‘File Drawer Problem’ and Tolerance for Null Results,” Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.
  • Seife, C. (2015), “Statistical Significance,” in This Idea Must Die: Scientific Theories That Are Blocking Progress, ed. J. Brockman, New York: HarperCollins Perennial, pp. 519–522.
  • Trafimow, D., and Earp, B.D. (2017), “Null Hypothesis Significance Testing and Type I Error: The Domain Problem,” New Ideas in Psychology, 45, 19–27.
  • Trafimow, D., and MacDonald, J. A. (2017), “Performing Inferential Statistics Prior to Data Collection,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77, 204–219.
  • Van Assen M.A.L.M., Van Aert R.C.M, Nuijten M.B., and Wicherts J.M. (2014), “Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant results,” PLoS ONE, 9, e84896.