11,868
Views
16
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Getting to a Post “p<0.05” Era

Correcting Corrupt Research: Recommendations for the Profession to Stop Misuse of p-Values

Pages 36-45 | Received 04 Apr 2018, Accepted 24 Aug 2018, Published online: 20 Mar 2019

References

  • (2017), “Review and prosper,” The Economist, 423, 99.
  • (2017), “Time’s up,” The Economist, 422, 69–71.
  • AACSB International (2008), “Final Report of the AACSB International Impact of Research Task Force,” St. Louis, MO: AACSB International.
  • Baker, M. (2016), “Is There a Reproducibility Crisis?” Nature, 533, 452–454. DOI:10.1038/533452a.
  • Bass, B. M. (1965), “The Psychologist and the Business School,” The Industrial Psychologist, 2, 14–18.
  • Bedeian, A. G. (2003), “The Manuscript Review Process: The Proper Role of Authors, Referees, and Editors,” Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 331–338. DOI:10.1177/1056492603258974.
  • Bedeian, A. G. (2004), “Peer Review and the Social Construction of Knowledge in the Management Discipline,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3, 198–216. DOI:10.5465/amle.2004.13500489.
  • Bedeian, A. G., Taylor, S. G., and Miller, A. N. (2010), “Management Science on the Credibility Bubble: Cardinal Sins and Various Misdemeanors,” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9, 715–725. DOI:10.5465/amle.9.4.zqr715.
  • Fisher, R. A. (1932), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oxford, UK: Oliver & Boyd.
  • Goodman, S. N., Fanelli, D., and Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2016), “What Does Research Reproducibility Mean?” Science Translational Medicine, 341, 1–6.
  • Gordon, R. A. and Howell, J. E. (1959), Higher Education for Business, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Hubbard, R. (2016), Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science, Los Angeles: Sage.
  • Hubbard, R., Parsa, R. A., and Luthy, M. R. (1997), “The Spread of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology: The Case of the Journal of Applied Psychology,” Theory & Psychology, 7, 545–554. DOI:10.1177/0959354397074006.
  • Hubbard, R. and Ryan, P. A. (2000), “The Historical Growth of Statistical Significance Testing in Psychology—and its Future Prospects,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 661–681. DOI:10.1177/00131640021970808.
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005), “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.” PLOS Medicine, 2, e124. DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124.
  • Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017), “What Have We (not) Learnt From Millions of Scientific Papers With p-Values?,” Presentation to the American Statistical Association, Bethesda MD.
  • Jackson, S. E. and Dutton, J. E. (1988), “Discerning Threats and Opportunities,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 370–387. DOI:10.2307/2392714.
  • Kmetz, J. L. (2011), “Fifty Lost Years: Why International Business Scholars Must not Emulate the US Social-Science Research Model,” World Journal of Management, 3, 172–200.
  • Kmetz, J. L. (2012), “Self-Reinforcement and Negative Entropy: The Black Hole Of Business-School Research,” in 28th European Group for Organization Studies (EGOS) Colloquium, Self-reinforcing Processes in Organizations, Networks and Professions, Helsinki, Finland, available at https://sites.edul.edu/mjs.
  • Kmetz, J. L. (2016), “Neither ‘Food Chain’ nor ‘Translation Problem’? The Disregard of Academic Research in Best-Selling Business Books,” International Journal of Business Administration, 7, 101–122.
  • Kmetz, J. L. (2017), Management Junk Science, available at https://sites.udel.edu/mjs.
  • Lane, P. J., Koka, B. R., and Pathak, S. (2006), “The Reification of Absorptive Capacity: A Critical Review and Rejuvenation of the Construct,” Academy of Management Review, 31, 833–863. DOI:10.5465/amr.2006.22527456.
  • Makel, M. C., Plucker, J. A., Freeman, J., Lombardi, A., Simonson, B., and Coyne, M. (2016), “Replication of Special Education Research: Necessary but far too Rare,” Remedial and Special Education, 37, 205–212. DOI:10.1177/0741932516646083.
  • Meehl, P. E. (1978), “Theoretical Risks and Tabular Asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the Slow Progress of Soft Psychology,” Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806–834. DOI:10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806.
  • Nelson, L. D., Simmons, J., and Simonshon, U. (2018), “Psychology’s Renaissance,” Annual Review of Psychology 69, 511–534. DOI:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011836.
  • Neyman, J, and Pearson, E. S. (1933), “On the Problem of the Most Efficient Test of Statistical Hypotheses,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A, 231, 289–337. DOI:10.1098/rsta.1933.0009.
  • Open Science Collaboration. (2015), “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science,” Science, 349, 4716.
  • Peters, D. and Ceci, S. J. (1982), “Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again,” The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 187–195. DOI:10.1017/S0140525X00011183.
  • Pierson, F. C. (1959), The education of American Businessmen: A Study of University-College Programs in Business Administration, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Reinhart, A. (2015), Statistics Done Wrong: The Woefully Complete Guide, San Francisco, CA: No Starch Press.
  • Rynes, S. L., Giluk, T. L., and Brown, K. G. (2007), “The Very Separate Worlds of Academic and Practitioner Periodicals in Human Resource Management: Implications for Evidence-Based Management,” Academy of Management Journal, 50, 987–1008. DOI:10.5465/amj.2007.27151939.
  • Sohn, D. (2000), “Significance Testing and the Science,” American Psychologist, 55, 964–965. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.8.964.
  • Starbuck, W. H. (2003), “Turning Lemons Into Lemonade: Where is the Value in Peer Reviews?,” Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 344–351. DOI:10.1177/1056492603258972.
  • Starbuck, W. H. (2008), “Croquet with the Queen of Hearts,” Presentation to the National Academy of Management, Anaheim, CA.
  • Vickers, A. (2010), What is a p-Value Anyway?: 34 Stories to Help You Actually Understand Statistics, Boston, MA: Addision-Wesley.
  • Wachtel, P. L. (1980), “Investigation and its Discontents,” American Psychologist, 35, 399–408. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.35.5.399.
  • Wasserstein, R. L. and Lazar, N. A. (2016), “The ASA’s Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose,” 70, 129–133. DOI:10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.
  • Webber, R. A., Ference, T. P., Fox, W. M., Miles, R. E., and Porter, L. W. (1970), “Behavioral Science and Management: Why the Troubled Marriage?” in eds. T. J. Atchison, and J. V. Ghorpade, Academy of Management Proceedings: Annual Meeting, 377–395. DOI:10.5465/ambpp.1970.4981250.
  • Wilkinson, L., and the Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999), “Statistical Methods in Psychology Journals: Guidelines and Explanations.” American Psychologist 54, 594–604. DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.54.8.594.
  • Wright, M. and Armstrong, J. S. (2008), “The Ombudsman: Verification of Citations: Fawlty Towers of Knowledge?” Interfaces, 38, 125–139. DOI:10.1287/inte.1070.0317.
  • Young, C. (2017), “‘See for Yourself’: The Pleasures and Sorrows of Transparency in Social Science Research,” Paper presented to the American Statistical Association Symposium on Statistical Inference, October 17, Bethesda, MD.
  • Ziliak, S. T. and McCloskey, D. N. (2008), The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs Us Jobs, Justice, and Lives, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.