Five Nonobvious Changes in Editorial Practice for Editors and Reviewers to Consider When Evaluating Submissions in a Post p < 0.05 Universe

References

• Berk, R. A., and Freedman, D. A. (2003), “Statistical Assumptions as Empirical Commitments.” in Law, Punishment, and Social Control: Essays in Honor of Sheldon Messinger, eds. T. G. Blomberg and S. Cohen (2nd ed), New York: Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 235–254.
   Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. P., and Draper, N. R. (1987), Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R. P. (1993), “The Case Against Statistical Signi?cance Testing, Revisited,” Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 287–292. DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1993.10806591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein, A. (1961), Relativity: The Special and the General Theory, Robert W. Lawson, Trans., New York: Crown Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. (2016), Corrupt Research: The Case for Reconceptualizing Empirical Management and Social Science, Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hyman, M. (2017), “Can ‘Results Blind Manuscript Evaluation’ Assuage ‘Publication Bias’?” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 247–251. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1350581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. (2017). “Comment on Locascio, Results Blind Science Publishing,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 256–257. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1355308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locascio, J. (2017a). “Results Blind Publishing,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 239–246. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1336093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locascio, J. (2017b), “Rejoinder to Responses to ‘Results Blind Publishing,”’ Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 9(5), 258–261. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1356305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, R. Y., and Singh, K. (1995), “Using i.i.d, Bootstrap Inference for General non-i.i.d, Models,” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 43, 67–75. DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(94)00008-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, M. J. (2017), “Commentary on Locascio 2017,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 39(5), 252–253. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2017.1350580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelson, A. A., and Morley, E. W. (1887), “On the Relative Motion of Earth and Luminiferous Ether,” American Journal of Science, Third Series, 34, 233–245, available at http://history.aip.org/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Open Science Collaboration (2015), “Estimating the Reproducibility of Psychological Science,” Science, 349, aac4716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2014), “Editorial,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36, 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2014.865505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2017), “Using the Coefficient of Confidence to Make the Philosophical Switch from a Posteriori to a priori Inferential Statistics,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(5), 831–854. DOI: 10.1177/0013164416667977.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D. (2018), “An a priori Solution to the Replication Crisis,” Philosophical Psychology, 31, 1188–1214. DOI: 10.1080/09515089.2018.1490707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., and Marks, M. (2015), “Editorial,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1012991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., and Marks, M. (2016), “Editorial,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38, 1–2. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2016.1141030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., and MacDonald, J. A. (2017), “Performing Inferential Statistics Prior to Data Collection,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 77(2), 204–219. DOI: 10.1177/0013164416659745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., and Rice, S. (2009), “What If Social Scientists Had Reviewed Great Scientific Works of the Past?” Perspectives in Psychological Science, 4, 65–78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01107.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trafimow, D., Wang, T., and Wang, C. (2018), “From a Sampling Precision Perspective, Skewness is a Friend and Not an Enemy!” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 79, 129–150. DOI: 10.1177/0013164418764801.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., Aloe, A. M., and Lau, T. S. (2015), “Life After NHST: How to Describe Your Data Without ‘p-ing’ Everywhere,” Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37, 260–273. DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1060240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziliak, S. T., and McCloskey, D. N. (2016), The Cult of Statistical Significance: How the Standard Error Costs us Jobs, Justice, and Lives, Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar