70
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Main articles

Alexander W. Williamson on the atomic theory: A study of nineteenth-century British atomism

Pages 17-31 | Received 07 Mar 1977, Published online: 19 Aug 2006

References

  • van't Hoff , J.H. 1874 . Sur les formules de structure dans l'espace . Archives neerlandaises des sciences exactes et naturelles , 9 : 445 – 454 . and J. A. Le Bel, ‘Sur les relations qui existent entre les formules atomiques des corps organiques, et le pouvoir rotatoire de leurs dissolutions’, Bulletin de la Société Chimique de France, (2) 2 (1874), 337–347. Both papers are reprinted in translation in O. T. Benfey (ed.), Classics in the theory of chemical combination (1963, New York), 151–171.
  • Farrar , W.F. 1964 . Sir B. C. Brodie and his calculus of chemical operations . Chymia , 9 : 169 – 179 . (p. 169)
  • See Brock W.H. Knight D.M. The atomic debates Isis 1965 56 1 29
  • Recently, some attention has been given to Wiliamson's atomism in Harris J. Brock W.H. From Giessen to Gower Street: towards a biography of Alexander William Williamson (1824–1904) Annals of science 1974 31 95 130 (pp. 110–111); and in W. H. Brock, ‘Alexander William Williamson’, in C. C. Gillispie (ed.) Dictionary of scientific biography, vol. 14 (1976, New York), 394–396.
  • See Brock W.H. The atomic debates his Leicester 1967 145 152
  • For a discussion of Liebig and the importance of his research laboratory to the growth of modern science, see Farrar W.V. Science and the German University system, 1790–1850 The emergence of science in Western Europe Crosland M.P. London 1976 179 192
  • Williamson's capacity to put forward new ideas during his tenure at Giessen has been examined recently in Harris J. Brock W.H. From Giessen to Gower Street: towards a biography of Alexander William Williamson (1824–1904) Annals of science 1974 31 103 106
  • See Blunck Richard Justus von Liebig: Die Lebensgeschichte eines Chemikers Hamburg 1946 20 23
  • Liebig , J. 1874 . “ Ueber das Studium der Naturwissenschaften und über den Zustand der Chemie in Preussen ” . In Reden und Abhandlungen Edited by: Carriere , M. 34 – 34 . Leipzig and Heidelberg This valuable work is difficult to obtain. See also Liebig, Ueber das Studium der Naturwissenschaften und über den Zustand der Chemie in Preussen (1840, Braunschweig); and E. von Meyer, A history of chemistry (1906, London), 274. For an excellent survey of the nature of German science during this period, see D. M. Knight, ‘German science in the Romantic period’, in M. P. Crosland (footnote 6), 161–178. Knight makes it clear that Naturphilosophie did not dominate all of German science; rather, it impacted on those areas in which science had been closely involved with a complete world-view, particularly chemistry and physiology. For a penetrating analysis of Naturphilosophie, see Barry Gower, ‘Speculation in physics: the history and practice of Naturphilosophie’, Studies in history and philosophy of science, 3 (1973), 301–356.
  • Liebig , J. 1840 . Der Zustand der Chemie in Preussen . Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie , 34 : 97 – 136 . (pp. 118–119).
  • Blunck , R. 1946 . Justus von Liebig: Die Lebensgeschichte eines Chemikers 23 – 23 . Hamburg Some Naturphilosophen, other than Schelling and Kastner, did not demean experiment and observation in a scientific setting. Among the most prominent we can cite R. W. Ritter and H. C. Oersted.
  • Liebig , J. 1891 . An autobiographical sketch . Annual report of the Smithsonian Institution , : 257 – 268 . (p. 263).
  • Liebig , J. 1870 . Induction and deduction . Annual report of the Smithsonian Institution , : 258 – 267 . (p. 266).
  • Liebig , J. 1870 . Induction and deduction . Annual report of the Smithsonian Institution , : 261 – 262 .
  • It has been suggested that Liebig's introduction of a vital principle in his 1840 Organic chemistry in its application to agriculture and physiology (1841, Cambridge), and his extensive discussion of the vital principle in his 1842 Animal chemistry or organic chemistry in its application to physiology and pathology (intro. by F. L. Holmes: 1964, New York) can be interpreted as metaphysical speculation. This is not the case, however. For Liebig the vital force could be scientifically understood in terms of its laws, just as any other force is explicable in terms of its laws; see T. O. Lipman, ‘Vitalism and reductionism in Liebig's physiological thought’, Isis, 58 (1967), 167–185. For an interesting discussion of the different types of vitalism see Benton E. Vitalism in nineteenth-century scientific thought: a typology and reassessment Studies in history and philosophy of science 1974 5 17 48
  • Liebig , J. 1843 . Familiar letters on chemistry 50 – 50 . London also see his ‘Letters VI and VII’, Familiar letters on chemistry (4th ed. 1859, London). At the time of this writing (1843) vitalism was still an important issue; see J. H. Brooke, ‘Wohler's urea and its vital force?—a verdict from the chemists’, Ambix, 15 (1968), 84–114; his ‘Organic synthesis and the unification of chemistry—a reappraisal’, British journal for the history of science, 5 (1971), 363–392; and E. Benton (footnote 15).
  • Liebig , J. 1843 . Familiar letters on chemistry 50 – 50 . London
  • Williamson produced five research articles while at Giessen, which Liebig considered sufficiently important to award Williamson the doctorate. Published in Liebig's Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie, the five papers are: On the decomposition of oxides and salts by chlorine 1845 54 133 143 ‘Some experiments on ozone’, 54 (1845), 127–133; ‘On the blue compound of cyanogen and iron’, 57 (1846), 225–246; ‘Bemerkungen und Versuche über die Ozontheorie’, 61 (1847), 13–37; and ‘Notiz über die Constitution des Oenanthols’, 61 (1847), 38–45.
  • Among other contacts between the two families, John Stuart Mill's father, James Mill, was associated with Williamson's father in the founding in 1827 of the University of London (afterwards University College, London); see Harris J. Brock W.H. From Giessen to Gower Street: towards a biography of Alexander William Williamson (1824–1904) Annals of science 1974 31 97 100
  • Comte, in fact, had hoped that Williamson would become the leader of his positivist doctrine in England; in this effort, however, Williamson proved to be disappointing. See Simon W.M. Auguste Comte's English disciples Victorian studies 1964 8 161 172 (p. 162); and J. Harris and W. H. Brock (footnote 4), 107, 109.
  • Comte , Auguste . 1858 . System of positive philosophy Edited by: Martineau , H. 199 – 199 . New York
  • Comte , Auguste . 1858 . System of positive philosophy Edited by: Martineau , H. 200 – 200 . New York
  • See Farrar W.V. Farrar K.R. Faith and doubt: the theory of structure in organic chemistry Proc. of the Chemical Society 1959 285 290 (p. 287); and F. F. Caldin, Structure of chemistry (1961, London), 12.
  • Comte , A. 1858 . System of positive philosophy Edited by: Martineau , H. 277 – 278 . New York
  • Comte , A. 1858 . System of positive philosophy Edited by: Martineau , H. 275 – 285 . New York
  • Comte , A. 1858 . System of positive philosophy Edited by: Martineau , H. 277 – 278 . New York
  • See Partington J.R. A history of chemistry London 1961-1964 1 419 421 4 vols. at the time the accepted value of oxygen was 8. See also A. W. Williamson, ‘On the classification of the elements in relation to their atomicities’, Journal of the Chemical Society, 17 (1864), 211–222, in which he discusses the chemical grounds for doubling the atomic weights of certain elements
  • Foster , G.C. 1905 . Williamson obituary . Journal of the Chemical Society (transactions) , 87 : 605 – 618 . (p. 611).
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 350 – 356 . (p. 351); reprinted in Papers on etherification and on the constitution of salt (1902, Edinburgh), no. 16, 7–17 (p. 9).
  • Roscoe , H.E. 1884 . Address to the Section of chemical science of the BAAS . Nature , 30 : 421 – 425 . (p. 422)
  • See Williamson A.W. Theory of etherification The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science 1850 37 3 9 10
  • Concerning Williamson's paper, the Theory of etherification The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science 1850 37 3 350 356 it has been noted that ‘certainly no chemical paper of equal length [seven pages] ever exercised so profound an influence on contemporary thought’; see T. E. Thorpe, ‘Prof. A. W. Williamson, F.R.S.’, Nature, 70 (1904), 32–34 (p. 33).
  • After his Parisian period with Comte, Williamson's professional career was entirely devoted to his chemical studies. He never published any researches in mathematics or philosophy, with the one exception of a sociological-philosophical tract entitled Development of difference the basis of unity London 1849 Delivered as his inaugural lecture at the University of London, this address was intended to initiate Comte's positivist philosophy among the English; see footnote 20.
  • Williamson , A.W. 1851–1854 . Suggestions for the dynamics of chemistry derived from the theory of etherification . Notices of the proceedings at the meetings of the members of the Royal Institution , 1 : 90 – 94 . (p. 91); reprinted as indicated in (footnote 30), 18–24 (p. 19).
  • Partington , J.R. 1961–1964 . A history of chemistry Vol. 4 , 450 – 450 . London 302–303.
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 12 – 13 . compare F. L. Holmes, ‘From elective affinities to chemical equilibria: Berthollet's law of mass action’, Chymia, 8 (1962), 105–145 (p. 131). His explanation can be represented in modern symbols as follows:
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 14 – 14 .
  • Compare Holmes F.L. Theory of etherification The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science 1850 37 3 132 132 and E. von Meyer (footnote 9), 554. See also A. W. Williamson, ‘Ueber die Theorie der Aetherbildung’, Annalen der Chemie und Pharmacie, 77 (1851), 37–49 (p. 47).
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 17 – 17 . see also his (footnote 35), 91.
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 16 – 16 .
  • Williamson , A.W. 1850 . Theory of etherification . The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin philosophical magazine and journal of science , 37 ( 3 ) : 16 – 16 .
  • See Levere T.H. Affinity and matter. Elements of chemical philosophy, 1800–1865 Oxford 1971 191 193 On chemical change and the nature of matter during the 19th century, see C. A. Russell, The history of valency (1971, New York); on Williamson's role with regard to Russell's discussion see pp. 44–62.
  • See Schofield R.E. Mechanism and materialism: British natural philosophy in an age of reason Princeton 1970 and A. Thackray, Atoms and powers: an essay on Newtonian matter-theory and the development of chemistry (1970, Cambridge, Mass.).
  • Berthollet , C.L. 1972 . Essai de statique chimique Edited by: Crosland , M.P. New York
  • See Crosland M.P. The Society of Arcueil: a view of French science at the time of Napoleon I Cambridge, Mass. 1967 236 240 and Holmes (footnote 37), 112–113.
  • See von Meyer E. A history of chemistry London 1906 194 195 550–552.
  • See von Meyer E. A history of chemistry London 1906 554 554 also A. W. Williamson (footnote 30), 16, and (footnote 39), 47.
  • In 1867 C. M. Guldberg and P. Waage, beginning with Berthollet's axioms, demonstrated their agreement with the notion of dynamical equilibrium in chemical observation; see their Etudes sur les affinités chimiques (1867, Christiania). See also Partington J.R. A history of chemistry London 1961–1964 4 588 595 and E. von Meyer (footnote 9), 554.
  • The type theory has recently been fully discussed: see Russell The history of valency New York 1971 44 62 N. W. Fisher, ‘Kekulé and organic classification’, Ambix, 21 (1974), 29–52; and H. Gay, ‘Radicals and types: a critical comparison of the methodologies of Popper and Lakatos and their use in the reconstruction of some 19th century chemistry’, Studies in history and philosophy of science, 7 (1976), 1–51 (pp. 27–30).
  • Williamson , A.W. 1851 . On the constitution of salts . Report of BAAS , 21 ( 2 ) : 54 – 54 . reprinted in (footnote 30), 39–40 (p. 40).
  • Williamson . 1851 . On the constitution of salts . The chemical gazette , 9 : 334 – 339 . (p. 336); reprinted in (footnote 30), 41–49 (pp. 43–44).
  • Compare von Meyer E. A history of chemistry London 1906 313 313
  • Liebig , J. 1842–1862 . Handwörterbuch der Chemie Vol. 1 , 697 – 697 . Brunswick (9 vols.
  • A. W. Hofmann (1848) and A. Wurtz (1849) had explored the possibility of a universal ammonia-type; see Partington J.R. A history of chemistry London 1961–1964 4 437 439
  • J. J. Griffin (1834) was obscure on his notion of a water-type, and A. Laurent (1846) dismissed the-notion altogether after some consideration; see Partington J.R. A history of chemistry London 1961–1964 4 444 445 and E. von Meyer (footnote 9), 312.
  • Foster , G.C. 1905 . Williamson obituary . Journal of the Chemical Society (transactions) , 87 : 612 – 613 .
  • Roscoe , H.E. 1884 . Address to the Section of chemical science of the BAAS . Nature , 30 : 421 – 425 . (p. 422).
  • Williamson . 1881 . Growth of the atomic theory . Report of BAAS , 51 : 568 – 580 . (pp. 571–572).
  • Williamson . 1881 . Growth of the atomic theory . Report of BAAS , 51 : 574 – 574 .
  • See Knight D.M. Atoms and elements: a study of theories of matter in the 19th century London 1967 60 82
  • Williamson . 1863 . Presidential address . Report of BAAS (notices and abstracts) , 33 : 28 – 32 . (p. 29).
  • Williamson . 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 328 – 365 .
  • Tillman , S.D. 1872 . Atoms and molecules . Nature , 6 : 171 – 173 . (p. 172).
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 328 – 328 .
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 340 – 340 .
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 350 – 351 .
  • Williamson's address On the atomic theory Journal of the Chemical Society 1869 22 328 365 was presented partially to refute a challenge by B. C. Brodie, that the atomic theory was unverifiable and thus strictly of metaphysical speculation. See D. M. Dallas in W. H. Brock (footnote 5), 31–90.
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 331 – 331 .
  • See Discussion of Dr. Williamson's lecture on the atomic theory Chemical news 1869 20 235 237 reprinted in D. M. Knight (ed.), Classical scientific papers: chemistry (1968, New York), 299–301. Compare Knight (footnote 62), 120–122. An interesting discussion of the conflict between atomists and anti-atomists during the latter half of the 19th century has been given recently by M. J. Nye, ‘The nineteenth-century atomic debates and and the dilemma of an “Indifferent hypothesis”’, Studies in history and philosophy of science, 7 (1976), 245–268.
  • See Williamson A.W. On the atomic theory Journal of the Chemical Society 1869 22 331 340
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 339 – 339 .
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 365 – 365 .
  • 1869 . Discussion of Dr. Williamson's lecture on the atomic theory . Chemical news , 20 : 235 – 235 . The meeting at which this discussion was held has since been characterized as one of the ‘debates’ on the atomic theory; see W. H. Brock and D. M. Knight (footnote 3), 18–23.
  • Williamson , A.W. 1869 . On the atomic theory . Journal of the Chemical Society , 22 : 357 – 357 .
  • Williamson , A.W. 1881 . Growth of the atomic theory . Report of BAAS , 51 : 569 – 570 .
  • 1869 . Discussion of Dr. Williamson's lecture on the atomic theory . Chemical news , 20 : 235 – 236 .

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.