Essay review

References

• Ruse , Michael . 1984 . “ A Philosopher's Day in Court ” . In Science and Creationism Edited by: Montagu , Ashley . 333 – 333 . New York For the gaffe on Gould, see Langdon Gilkey, Creationism on Trial: Evolution and God at Little Rock (Minneapolis, 1985), pp. 132–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher , Philip . 1986 . Simple Naturalism . Times Higher Education Supplement , August : 17 – 17 . 29
   Google Scholar
• Ruse , Michael . 1979 . The Darwinian Revolution: Science Red in Tooth and Claw 264 – 265 . Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Greene , John C. 1977 . Darwin as a Social Evolutionist . Journal of the History of Biology , 10 : 1 – 27 . reprinted in idem, Science, Ideology, and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas (Berkeley, 1981), chapter 5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruse , Michael . 1980 . Social Darwinism: The Two Sources . Albion , 12 : 23 – 36 .
   Google Scholar
• Ruse , Michael . 1980 . Charles Darwin and Group Selection . Annals of Science , 37 : 615 – 630 .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• review of Ruse Michael Science, Ideology, and World View: Essays in the History of Evolutionary Ideas Annals of Science John C. Greene 1982 39 427 428
   Google Scholar
• Wilson , Edward O. 1983 . “ Sociobiology: from Darwin to the Present ” . In Darwin's Legacy Edited by: Charles L. , Hamrum . 56 – 66 . New York in
   Google Scholar
• See Bellomy Donald C. “Social Darwinism” Revisited Perspectives in American History 1984 1 1 129 new series and James R. Moore, ‘Socializing Darwinism: Historiography and the Fortunes of a Phrase’, in Science as Politics, edited by Les Levidow (London, 1986), pp. 38–80.
   Google Scholar
• Richards , Robert J. 1982 . “ Darwin and the Biologizing of Moral Behavior ” . In The Problematic Science: Psychology in the Nineteenth-Century Edited by: Woodward , William R. and Ash , Mitchell G. 43 – 64 . New York in
   Google Scholar
• Ruse , Michael and Wilson , E.O. 1986 . Moral Philosophy as Applied Science . Philosophy , 61 : 173 – 192 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The transatlantic affinities of sociobiology are worked out admirably if a little inaccurately by Patrick Gray J. Wolfe Linda D. Sociobiology and Creationism: Two Ethnosociologies of American Culture American Anthropologist 1982 84 580 594 in and by Martin Barker in The New Racism: Conservatives and the Ideology of the Tribe (London, 1981), chapters 6–8. Gray and Wolfe conclude that, ‘while sociobiology is nontheistic, evolutionary, and finds its morality in natural selection and creationism is theistic nonevolutionary, and finds its morality in the supernatural, both arrive at the same conclusion as regards American society: the American way of life is founded on eternal values which are best inculcated by the traditional family, and alternative life styles threaten to destroy this way of life’ (p. 591). Barker, like Ruse and Wilson, sees Hume's philosophy of human nature as the root of the matter.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compare the ways in which Wilson and Ruse have pursued the debate into the religious press Wilson E.O. The Relation of Science to Theology Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 1980 15 425 434 Michael Ruse, ‘Evolutionary Ethics: A Phoenix Arisen’, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science, 21 (1986), 95–112. The best exposé is Mary Midgley's Evolution as a Religion: Strange Hopes and Stranger Fears (London, 1985).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruse , Michael . 1985 . Admayration . Quarterly Review of Biology , 60 : 183 – 192 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar