References
References
- Bowlby J (1969) Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment New York Basic Books
- Bowlby J (1973) Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger
- Bippus , AM . (2001) . Recipients’ criteria for evaluating the skillfulness of comforting communication and the outcomes of comforting interactions . Communication Monographs , 68 : 301 – 313 .
- Burleson , BR and Samter , W . (1985) . Consistencies in theoretical and naïve evaluations of comforting messages . Communication Monographs , 52 : 103 – 123 .
- Burleson , BR and Mortenson , SR . (2003) . Explaining cultural differences in evaluations of emotional support behaviors: Exploring the mediating influences of value systems and interaction goals . Communication Research , 30 : 113 – 146 .
- Burleson , BR , Samter , W , Jones , SM , Kunkel , A , Holmstrom , AJ , Mortenson , ST and MacGeorge , EL . (2005) . Which comforting messages really work best? A different perspective on Lemieux and Tighe's “receiver perspective” . Communication Research Reports , 22 : 87 – 100 .
- Clinton , BL and Hancock , GR . (1991) . The development of an understanding of comforting messages . Communication Reports , 4 : 55 – 63 .
- Hale , JL , Tighe , MR and Mongeau , PA . (1997) . Effects of event type and sex on comforting messages . Communication Research Reports , 14 : 214 – 220 .
- Jones , SM . (2004) . Putting the person into person-centered and immediate emotional support: Emotional change and perceived helper competence as outcomes of comforting in helping situations . Communication Research , 31 : 338 – 360 .
- Kunkel , AW . (2002) . Explaining sex differences in the evaluation of comforting messages: The mediating role of interaction goals . Communication Reports , 15 : 29 – 42 .
- Kunkel , AW and Burleson , BR . (1999) . Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts . Human Communication Research , 25 : 304 – 340 .
- Tighe MR Hale JL Lemieux R (1994) Social skills and contextual differences in comforting responses Paper presented at the annual convention of the Speech Communication Association New Orleans