Non-isotropic angular Stockwell transform and the associated uncertainty principles

References

• Gröchenig K. Foundations of time-frequency analysis. Boston: Birkhäuser; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Ali ST, Antoine JP, Gazeau JP. Coherent states, wavelets, and their generalizations. New York: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Gabor D. Theory of communications. J Inst Electr Eng. 1946;93:429–457.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath L, Shah FA. Wavelet transforms and their applications. New York: Birkhäuser; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath L, Shah FA. Lecturer notes on wavelet transforms. Boston: Birkhäuser; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes J, Velho J. From Fourier analysis to wavelets. New York: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Addison PS. The illustrated wavelet transform handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell RG, Mansinha L, Lowe RP. Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1996;44:998–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candés EJ, Donoho DL. Ridgelets: a key to higher-dimensional intermittency? Phil Trans R Soc London A. 1999;357:2495–2509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candés EJ, Donoho DL. Continuous curvelet transform I: resolution of the wavefront set. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2005;19:162–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Do MN, Vetterli M. The contourlet transform: an efficient directional multiresolution image representation. IEEE Trans Image Proc. 2005;14:2091–2106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutyniok G, Labate D. Resolution of the wavefront set using continuous shearlets. Trans Amer Math Soc. 2009;361:2719–2754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad A, Manna S, Mahato A, et al. The generalized continuous wavelet transform associated with the fractional Fourier transform. J Comput Appl Math. 2014;259:660–671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockwell RG. Why use the S transform? Pseudo-Differ Oper Partial Differ Equ Time Frequency Anal. 2007;52:279–309.
   Google Scholar
• Stockwell RG. A basis for efficient representation of the S-transform. Digit Signal Process. 2007;17:371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du J, Wong MW, Zhu H. Continuous and discrete inversion formulas for the Stockwell transform. Integral Transform Spec Funct. 2007;18:537–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Orchard J. Fast discrete orthonormal Stockwell transform. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2009;31:4000–4012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutníková M, Mišková A. Continuous Stockwell transform; coherent states and localization operators. J Math Phys. 2015;56:073504.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riba L, Wong MW. Continuous inversion formulas for multi-dimensional modified Stockwell transforms. Integral Transform Spec Funct. 2015;26(1):9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battisti U, Riba L. Window-dependent bases for efficient representations of the Stockwell transform. Appl Comput Harmon Anal. 2016;40:292–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catanǎ V. Abelian and Tauberian results for the one-dimensional modified Stockwell transforms. Appl Anal. 2017;96(6):1047–1057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saneva K, Atanasovaa S, Buralievab JV. Tauberian theorems for the Stockwell transform of Lizorkin distributions. Appl Anal. 2018. doi:10.1080/00036811.2018.1506104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabycz S, Stockwell RG, Mitchell JR. Image texture characterization using the discrete orthonormal S-transform. J Digit Imaging. 2009;22(6):696–708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moukadem A, Bouguila Z, Abdeslam DO, et al. A new optimized Stockwell transform applied on synthetic and real non-stationary signals. Digit Signal Process. 2015;46:226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Wong M. Inversion formulas for two dimensional Stockwell transforms. Pseudo differential operators: partial differential equations and time-frequency analysis; 2007, p. 323–330.
   Google Scholar
• Beckner W. Pitt's inequality and the uncertainty principle. Proc Amer Math Soc. 1995;123:1897–1905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folland GB, Sitaram A. The uncertainty principle: a mathematical survey. J Fourier Anal Appl. 1997;3:207–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlke S, Maass P. The affine uncertainty principle in one and two dimensions. Comput Math Appl. 1995;30:293–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battle G. Heisenberg inequalities for wavelet states. Appl Comput Harmonic Anal. 1997;4:119–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilczok E. New uncertainty principles for the continuous Gabor transform and the continuous wavelet transform. Doc Math. 2000;5:201–226.
   Google Scholar
• Guanlei X, Xiaotong W, Xiaogang X. The logarithmic, Heisenberg's and short-time uncertainty principles associated with fractional Fourier transform. Sig Process. 2009;89:339–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omri S. Logarithmic uncertainty principle for the Hankel transform. Integ Transf Spec Funct. 2011;22(9):655–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltani F. Pitt's inequality and logarithmic uncertainty principle for Dunkl transform on R. Acta Math Hungar. 2014;143(2):480–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejjaoli H. Uncertainty principles for the generalized Fourier transform associated to a Dunkl-type operator. Appl Anal. 2016;95(9):1930–1956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamadi NB, Omri S. Uncertainty principles for the continuous wavelet transform in the Hankel setting. Appl Anal. 2018;97(4):513–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumber A, Shukla NK. Uncertainty principle corresponding to an orthonormal wavelet system. Appl Anal. 2018;97(3):486–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su Y. Heisenberg type uncertainty principle for continuous Shearlet transform. J Nonlinear Sci Appl. 2016;9:778–786.
   Google Scholar
• Bahri M, Ashino R. Logarithmic uncertainty principle, convolution theorem related to continuous fractional wavelet transform and its properties on a generalized Sobolev space. Int J Wavelets, Multiresol Informat Process. 2017;15(5):1750050 (22 pages).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah FA, Tantary AY. Polar wavelet transform and the associated uncertainty principles. Int J Theor Phys. 2018;57(6):1774–1786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowling MG, Price JF. Bandwidth verses time concentration: the Heisenberg–Pauli–Weyl inequality. SIAM J Math Anal. 1994;15(1):151–165.
   Google Scholar