Minimal blow-up initial data for potential blow-up solutions to inter-critical Schrödinger equations

References

• Cazenave T, Weissler F. The cauchy problem for the critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in Hs. Nonlinear Anal. 1990;14:807–836. doi: 10.1016/0362-546X(90)90023-A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Xu G, Zhao L. The cauchy problem of the Hartree equation. Dedicated to Professor Li Daqian on the occasion of seventieth birthday. J Partial Differ Equ. 2008;21:22–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher I, Koch GS, Planchon F. A profile decomposition approach to the Lt∞(Lx3) Navier–Stokes regularity criterion. Math Ann. 2013;355(4):1527–1559. doi: 10.1007/s00208-012-0830-0
   Google Scholar
• Rusin W, Sverak V. Minimal initial data for potential Navier–Stokes singularities. J Funct Anal. 2011;260:879–891. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2010.09.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig CE, Merle F. Global well-posedness, scattering and blow-up for the energy critical, focusing, non-linear Schrödinger equation in the radial case. Invent Math. 2006;166:645–675. doi: 10.1007/s00222-006-0011-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig CE, Merle F. Scattering for H˙12 bounded solutions to the cubic, defocusing NLS in 3 dimensions. Trans Amer Math Soc. 2009;362(4):1937–1962. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9947-09-04722-9
   Google Scholar
• Global wellposedness of defocusing critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in the radial case. J Amer Math Soc. 1999;12:253–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garillakis G. On nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2000;25:1827–1844. doi: 10.1080/03605300008821569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao T. Global well-posedness and scattering for the higher-dimensional energy-critical non-linear Schrödinger equation for radial data. New York J Math. 2005;11:57–80.
   Google Scholar
• Golliander J, Keel M, Staffilani G, et al. Global well-posedness and scattering for the energy-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in R3. Ann Math. 2008;167:767–865. doi: 10.4007/annals.2008.167.767
   Google Scholar
• Ryckman E, Visan M. Global well-posedness and scattering for the defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in R1+4. Amer J Math. 2007;129:1–60. doi: 10.1353/ajm.2007.0004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visan M. The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in higher dimensions. Duke Math J. 2007;138:281–374. doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-07-13825-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visan M. The defocusing energy-critical nonlinear Schrödinger equation in dimensions five and higher [PhD thesis]. UCLA; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy J. Inter-critical NLS: critical H˙s-bounds imply scattering. SIAM J Math Anal. 2014;46(1):939–997. doi: 10.1137/120898280
   Google Scholar
• Miao C, Xu G, Zhao L. Global well-posedness and scattering for the energy critical, defocusing Hartree equation for radial data. J Funct Anal. 2007;253:605–627. doi: 10.1016/j.jfa.2007.09.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Xu G, Zhao L. Global well-posedness and scattering for defocusing H1/2-subcritical Hartree equation in Rd. Ann I H Poncáre-AN. 2009;26:1831–1852. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2009.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miao C, Xu G, Zhao L. Global well-posedness and scattering for the energy critical, defocusing Hartree equation in Rn+1. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2011;36:729–776. doi: 10.1080/03605302.2010.531073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng J. The defocusing energy-supercritical Hartree equation. Acta Math Sin Engl Ser. 2014;30(4):547–566. doi: 10.1007/s10114-014-3299-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keel M, Tao T. Endpoint Strichartz estimates. Amer J Math. 1998;120:955–980. doi: 10.1353/ajm.1998.0039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strichartz R. Restrictions of Fourier transforms to quadratic surfaces and decay of solutions of wave equations. Duke Math J. 1977;44:705–714. doi: 10.1215/S0012-7094-77-04430-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Killip R, Visan M. Energy-supercritical NLS: critical H˙s-bounds imply scattering. Commun Partial Differ Equ. 2010;35:945–987. doi: 10.1080/03605301003717084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenig C, Ponce G, Vega L. Well-posedness and scattering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation via the contraction principle. Commun Pure Appl Math. 1993;46:527–620. doi: 10.1002/cpa.3160460405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keraani S. On the defect of compatness for the Strichartz estimates of the Schrödinger equation. J Differ Equ. 2001;175:353–392. doi: 10.1006/jdeq.2000.3951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao S. Maximizers for the Strichartz inequalities and the Sobolev–Strichartz inequalities for the Schrödinger equation. Electron J Differ Equ. 2009;3:13.
   Google Scholar